FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3203044870> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3203044870 endingPage "e67" @default.
• W3203044870 startingPage "e58" @default.
• W3203044870 abstract "Many patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used to follow clavicle fractures, providing an objective means to track outcomes. However, lack of standardization of PROM usage makes cross-study comparison difficult. Therefore, we reviewed articles on clavicle fractures from 11 of the most influential orthopedic journals to assess trends in PROM usage over time and based on geographic location.A focused systematic review of 11 of the most influential orthopedic journals was performed using PubMed. All articles published between 1981 and 2020 with greater than 9 patients reporting clinical outcomes of clavicle fractures were included. For each article, patient demographics, treatment modality, geographic location, and outcome measures used were recorded. Temporal trends were identified using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend and linear regression. Pearson chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare between journals, geographic location, study type, and fracture classification.From the initial literature search of 623 articles, 151 studies reporting on 15,853 primary clavicle fractures were included. Fractures of the middle one-third of the clavicle were most studied in the included literature (71%). Seventeen different PROMs were used, with an average of 1.6 outcome measures per study, and there was a significant increase in the number of PROMs used per article over time (P < .001). The Constant-Murley score was the most-reported outcome measure (44%) followed by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (27%), visual analog scale for pain (23%), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES; 14%). There was a significant difference between the measures used based on geography (P = .002), the most notable being that North American authors use the ASES score more frequently.The use of PROMs in studies evaluating clavicle fracture treatment outcomes has increased over time, with recent studies reporting more PROMs than older studies, and there are notable differences in usage of the various scores based on geography and journal. Although there is no consensus on the most reliable PROM for assessing clavicle fractures, we recommend the use of at least 2 of the commonly reported PROMs in future studies to facilitate cross-study comparisons." @default.
• W3203044870 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3203044870 creator A5009426707 @default.
• W3203044870 creator A5033207279 @default.
• W3203044870 creator A5044992117 @default.
• W3203044870 creator A5046657912 @default.
• W3203044870 creator A5066762791 @default.
• W3203044870 creator A5077374736 @default.
• W3203044870 date "2022-02-01" @default.
• W3203044870 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W3203044870 title "Current trends in patient-reported outcome measures for clavicle fractures: a focused systematic review of 11 influential orthopaedic journals" @default.
• W3203044870 cites W1796642829 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W1981851322 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2078896484 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2111388151 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2133978545 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2160262734 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2230309678 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2574509339 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2623434274 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2735586212 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2793324915 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2811388790 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2887773049 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2963773527 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2982561197 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W2994955053 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W3014093268 @default.
• W3203044870 cites W3034840064 @default.
• W3203044870 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.034" @default.
• W3203044870 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34619348" @default.
• W3203044870 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3203044870 type Work @default.
• W3203044870 sameAs 3203044870 @default.
• W3203044870 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3203044870 countsByYear W32030448702022 @default.
• W3203044870 countsByYear W32030448702023 @default.
• W3203044870 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3203044870 hasAuthorship W3203044870A5009426707 @default.
• W3203044870 hasAuthorship W3203044870A5033207279 @default.
• W3203044870 hasAuthorship W3203044870A5044992117 @default.
• W3203044870 hasAuthorship W3203044870A5046657912 @default.
• W3203044870 hasAuthorship W3203044870A5066762791 @default.
• W3203044870 hasAuthorship W3203044870A5077374736 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C2777364248 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C2780193326 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C131872663 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C141071460 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C14184104 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C159110408 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C17744445 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C1862650 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C199539241 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C2777364248 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C2779473830 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C2779517570 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C2779951463 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C2780193326 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C2781184374 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C68312169 @default.
• W3203044870 hasConceptScore W3203044870C71924100 @default.
• W3203044870 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3203044870 hasLocation W32030448701 @default.
• W3203044870 hasLocation W32030448702 @default.
• W3203044870 hasOpenAccess W3203044870 @default.
• W3203044870 hasPrimaryLocation W32030448701 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W2187272330 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W2801269086 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W2891246323 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W2938760870 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W2947427541 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W3047793726 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W3096163152 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W3202429883 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W3215830417 @default.
• W3203044870 hasRelatedWork W4283371401 @default.
• W3203044870 hasVolume "31" @default.
• W3203044870 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3203044870 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3203044870 magId "3203044870" @default.
• W3203044870 workType "article" @default.