FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3203065172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3203065172 abstract "Why is this an important issue for history teachers? In part, because of the increasingly influential role that PowerPoint (or other presentation software) has played in history teaching over the past decade, particularly since the widespread availability of data projectors within ‘ordinary’ classrooms (OECD, 2010). In some schools, the combination of data projector and PowerPoint presentation has become one of the most prevalent modes of pedagogy, superseding the ‘textbook’ paradigm which had previously been dominant in history teaching in the UK (Beswick, 2011; Haydn, 2011). A recent OECD study of the use of new technology in UK classrooms suggested that, in some schools, pupils were being given a ‘staple diet’ of PowerPoint (or interactive whiteboard) presentations as they moved from lesson to lesson (OECD, 2010). One of my colleagues recently told me that large numbers of pupils at his school had sent a petition to the head teacher to protest about the excessive use of PowerPoint, and a number of the mentors in our initial teacher education partnership have told me that they sometimes forbid student teachers to use PowerPoint for a period of time, as they are concerned about student dependence on this mode of teaching. At the time of writing, it seems reasonable to claim that PowerPoint (or equivalent) is a routinely used tool for teaching history in the UK. It is not just a problem of the pervasiveness of PowerPoint and the possibility that history teachers and student teachers may be over-reliant on it as a teaching approach. The use of PowerPoint is also problematic because it is sometimes used maladroitly, in a way that fails to sustain learners’ attention. When I give talks about the use of ICT, I routinely ask students if they have ever been severely bored by a PowerPoint presentation: usually, every hand goes up. There cannot be many people reading this who have not shared this experience. As far as I am aware, it is the only ICT application internationally recognised as a cause of death. A Google search on ‘Death by PowerPoint’ brought up 2.2 million hits; an image search of the same phrase, 2.8 million hits. So what is it about PowerPoint that evinces such responses and outcomes? How can history teachers respond intelligently to the issues arising out of the easy access to such presentation software?1" @default.
• W3203065172 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3203065172 creator A5038562708 @default.
• W3203065172 date "2013-02-11" @default.
• W3203065172 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3203065172 title "We need to talk about PowerPoint" @default.
• W3203065172 cites W2076093943 @default.
• W3203065172 doi "https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075593-14" @default.
• W3203065172 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W3203065172 type Work @default.
• W3203065172 sameAs 3203065172 @default.
• W3203065172 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3203065172 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W3203065172 hasAuthorship W3203065172A5038562708 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C2780218261 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C2780315633 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C71750763 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C126838900 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C144024400 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C145420912 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C15744967 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C17744445 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C19417346 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C199539241 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C2777601897 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C2780218261 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C2780315633 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C41008148 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C49774154 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C71750763 @default.
• W3203065172 hasConceptScore W3203065172C71924100 @default.
• W3203065172 hasLocation W32030651721 @default.
• W3203065172 hasOpenAccess W3203065172 @default.
• W3203065172 hasPrimaryLocation W32030651721 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W1505089795 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W1789227156 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W1978285575 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W1982221619 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W1982739961 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2053388684 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2060649307 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2062419979 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2132913707 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2188719034 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2334367191 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2559883139 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2800249440 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W307302342 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W308729667 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W327367426 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W638156703 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W94284590 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2597041382 @default.
• W3203065172 hasRelatedWork W2993755863 @default.
• W3203065172 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3203065172 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3203065172 magId "3203065172" @default.
• W3203065172 workType "book-chapter" @default.