FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3204113847> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3204113847 endingPage "7312" @default.
• W3204113847 startingPage "7299" @default.
• W3204113847 abstract "The objectives of the work presented in this paper were to (1) implement a robust-optimization method for deliverable mixed-beam radiotherapy (MBRT) plans within a previously developed MBRT planning framework; (2) perform an experimental validation of the delivery of robust-optimized MBRT plans; and (3) compare PTV-based and robust-optimized MBRT plans in terms of target dose robustness and organs at risk (OAR) sparing for clinical head and neck and brain patient cases.A robust-optimization method, which accounts for translational setup errors, was implemented within a previously developed treatment planning framework for MBRT. The framework uses a hybrid direct aperture optimization method combining column generation and simulated annealing. A robust plan was developed and then delivered to an anthropomorphic head phantom using the Developer Mode of a TrueBeam linac. Planar dose distributions were measured and compared to the planned dose. Robust-optimized and PTV-based plans were developed for three clinical patient cases consisting of two head and neck cases and one brain case. The plans were compared in terms of the robustness to 5 mm shifts of the target volume dose as well as in terms of OAR sparing.Using a gamma criterion of 3%/2 mm and a dose threshold of 10%, the agreement between film measurements and dose calculations was better than 97.7% for the total plan and better than 95.5% for the electron component of the plan. For the two head and neck patient cases, the average clinical target volume (CTV) dose homogeneity index (V95%-V107%) over all the considered setup error scenarios was on average 19% lower for the PTV-based plans and it had a larger standard deviation. The robust-optimized plans achieved, on average, a 20% reduction in the OAR doses compared to the PTV-based plans. For the brain patient case, the CTV dose homogeneity index was similar for the two plans, while the OAR doses were 22% lower, on average, for the robust-optimized plan. No clear trend in terms of electron contributions was found across the three patient cases, although robust-optimized plans tended toward higher electron beam energies.A framework for robust optimization of deliverable MBRT plans has been developed and validated. PTV-based MBRT were found to not be robust to setup errors, while the dose delivered by the robust-optimized plans were clinically acceptable for all considered error scenarios and had better OAR sparing. This study shows that the robust optimization is a promising alternative to conventional PTV margins for MBRT." @default.
• W3204113847 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5004906997 @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5015273185 @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5019068896 @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5028520885 @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5033862514 @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5066668519 @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5085777557 @default.
• W3204113847 creator A5088973985 @default.
• W3204113847 date "2021-10-14" @default.
• W3204113847 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W3204113847 title "Implementation and experimental validation of a robust hybrid direct aperture optimization approach for mixed‐beam radiotherapy" @default.
• W3204113847 cites W1975598755 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W1980055937 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W1981865906 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W1992654860 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2001611929 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2001864252 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2002054274 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2006637407 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2016817816 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2040454107 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2043582502 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2046047501 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2048294709 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2063587223 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2068113366 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2069633390 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2102054724 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2102776378 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2123507114 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2610531088 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2612496985 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2791042095 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2848091815 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W2908811472 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W3180585268 @default.
• W3204113847 cites W3204113847 @default.
• W3204113847 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15258" @default.
• W3204113847 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34585756" @default.
• W3204113847 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3204113847 type Work @default.
• W3204113847 sameAs 3204113847 @default.
• W3204113847 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3204113847 countsByYear W32041138472021 @default.
• W3204113847 countsByYear W32041138472022 @default.
• W3204113847 countsByYear W32041138472023 @default.
• W3204113847 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5004906997 @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5015273185 @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5019068896 @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5028520885 @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5033862514 @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5066668519 @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5085777557 @default.
• W3204113847 hasAuthorship W3204113847A5088973985 @default.
• W3204113847 hasBestOaLocation W32041138471 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C180048950 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C2780271382 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C3018411727 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C63479239 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C104293457 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C104317684 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C120665830 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C121332964 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C126838900 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C141071460 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C168834538 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C180048950 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C185592680 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C201645570 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C2780271382 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C2989005 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C3018411727 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C41008148 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C509974204 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C55493867 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C63479239 @default.
• W3204113847 hasConceptScore W3204113847C71924100 @default.
• W3204113847 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W3204113847 hasLocation W32041138471 @default.
• W3204113847 hasLocation W32041138472 @default.
• W3204113847 hasLocation W32041138473 @default.

• next