FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3204262523> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3204262523 abstract "Background Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has a significant impact on the prognosis of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Our aim was to identify the independent risk factors for LNM and construct nomograms for male and female EGC patients, respectively. Methods Clinicopathological data of 1,742 EGC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital, and Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between November 2011 and April 2021 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Male and female patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were assigned to training sets and then from the Second and Fourth Affiliated Hospitals of Anhui Medical University were enrolled in validation sets. Based on independent risk factors for LNM in male and female EGC patients from the training sets, the nomograms were established respectively, which was also verified by internal validation from the training sets and external validation from the validation sets. Results Tumor size (odd ratio (OR): 1.386, p = 0.030), depth of invasion (OR: 0.306, p = 0.001), Lauren type (OR: 2.816, p = 0.000), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR: 0.160, p = 0.000), and menopause (OR: 0.296, p = 0.009) were independent risk factors for female EGC patients. For male EGC patients, tumor size (OR: 1.298, p = 0.007), depth of invasion (OR: 0.257, p = 0.000), tumor location (OR: 0.659, p = 0.002), WHO type (OR: 1.419, p = 0.001), Lauren type (OR: 3.099, p = 0.000), and LVI (OR: 0.131, p = 0.000) were independent risk factors. Moreover, nomograms were established to predict the risk of LNM for female and male EGC patients, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of nomograms for female and male training sets were 87.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8397–0.914) and 94.8% (95% CI: 0.9273–0.9695), respectively. For the validation set, they were 92.4% (95% CI: 0.7979–1) and 93.4% (95% CI: 0.8928–0.9755), respectively. Additionally, the calibration curves showed good agreements between the bias-corrected prediction and the ideal reference line for both training sets and validation sets in female and male EGC patients. Conclusions Nomograms based on risk factors for LNM in male and female EGC patients may provide new insights into the selection of appropriate treatment methods." @default.
• W3204262523 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5006181213 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5024452255 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5030638966 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5038290473 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5058104443 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5068596733 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5075407431 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5076359700 @default.
• W3204262523 creator A5088861670 @default.
• W3204262523 date "2021-09-29" @default.
• W3204262523 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W3204262523 title "Nomograms for Predicting the Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer by Gender: A Retrospective Multicentric Study" @default.
• W3204262523 cites W1504500092 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W1965168944 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W1991859439 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2024590196 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2107811679 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2129716015 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2142511040 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2195805180 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2272984102 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2553625575 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2639102888 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2728901363 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2792899004 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2802546783 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2806079899 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2806948074 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2889646458 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2912290257 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2957227376 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2963776534 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2980434127 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2986719004 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W2990873809 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W3012694721 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W3032156838 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W3089295247 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W3128646645 @default.
• W3204262523 cites W4250948394 @default.
• W3204262523 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616951" @default.
• W3204262523 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8511824" @default.
• W3204262523 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34660252" @default.
• W3204262523 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3204262523 type Work @default.
• W3204262523 sameAs 3204262523 @default.
• W3204262523 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3204262523 countsByYear W32042625232021 @default.
• W3204262523 countsByYear W32042625232022 @default.
• W3204262523 countsByYear W32042625232023 @default.
• W3204262523 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5006181213 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5024452255 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5030638966 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5038290473 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5058104443 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5068596733 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5075407431 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5076359700 @default.
• W3204262523 hasAuthorship W3204262523A5088861670 @default.
• W3204262523 hasBestOaLocation W32042625231 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C2778740770 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C2779013556 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C2780470880 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C2992571226 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C34626388 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C121608353 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C126322002 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C143998085 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C2778740770 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C2779013556 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C2780470880 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C2780824555 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C2780849966 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C29456083 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C2992571226 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C34626388 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C71924100 @default.
• W3204262523 hasConceptScore W3204262523C90924648 @default.
• W3204262523 hasLocation W32042625231 @default.
• W3204262523 hasLocation W32042625232 @default.
• W3204262523 hasLocation W32042625233 @default.
• W3204262523 hasOpenAccess W3204262523 @default.
• W3204262523 hasPrimaryLocation W32042625231 @default.
• W3204262523 hasRelatedWork W1971504212 @default.
• W3204262523 hasRelatedWork W2063244522 @default.
• W3204262523 hasRelatedWork W2068601994 @default.
• W3204262523 hasRelatedWork W2235400467 @default.
• W3204262523 hasRelatedWork W2403639979 @default.
• W3204262523 hasRelatedWork W2413657513 @default.

• next