Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3204371925> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W3204371925 abstract "Abstract Background Gastrointestinal endoscopy is an uncomfortable and stressful procedure for most patients. Conscious sedation is a common strategy for improving patient comfort during this procedure. Benzodiazepines (gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists) such as midazolam have been used for sedation of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The effective dose ranges of such agents differ considerably among patients, making it difficult to achieve stable sedation. Also obesity is a significant health problem that has assumed epidemic proportions. As a result, the number of obese patients requiring endoscopy is increasing. It is relatively unknown how safe the current practices of sedation for endoscopic procedures are in bariatric patients. Therefore, special consideration should be given to these patients Aim of the Work To compare the sedative properties and haemodynamic and respiratory effects of Dexmedetomidine and a Ketamine-Propofol combination (ketofol) in obese patients undergoing Upper GI Endoscopy. Patients and Methods This study was conducted in the endoscopy unit of Ain Shams University Hospital after obtaining approval from the Research Ethical Committee of Ain Shams University. A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was found to be the most suitable design in order to achieve the study objectives. Cases were divided into 2 groups using computer generated random list of numbers in sealed opaque envelopes. Results We found that ketamine-propofol infusion (1:3) is a better sedation regimen for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy compared to dexmedetomidine as lesser time is taken to achieve optimal sedation, with no hemodynamic unstability or postprocedure complications. Conclusion In this study, we compared a group of 40 upper GIT endoscopy obese patients (BMI 30-40) who received procedural sedation with either Dexmedetomidine or propofolketamine combination, we found that ketamine-propofol infusion (1:3) is a better sedation regimen for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy compared to dexmedetomidine as lesser time is taken to achieve optimal sedation, with no hemodynamic unstability or post procedure complications." @default.
- W3204371925 created "2021-10-11" @default.
- W3204371925 creator A5012780071 @default.
- W3204371925 creator A5069756025 @default.
- W3204371925 creator A5070132684 @default.
- W3204371925 creator A5078425218 @default.
- W3204371925 date "2021-10-01" @default.
- W3204371925 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W3204371925 title "Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine-Propofol for Sedation of Obese Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy" @default.
- W3204371925 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcab086.092" @default.
- W3204371925 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3204371925 type Work @default.
- W3204371925 sameAs 3204371925 @default.
- W3204371925 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W3204371925 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3204371925 hasAuthorship W3204371925A5012780071 @default.
- W3204371925 hasAuthorship W3204371925A5069756025 @default.
- W3204371925 hasAuthorship W3204371925A5070132684 @default.
- W3204371925 hasAuthorship W3204371925A5078425218 @default.
- W3204371925 hasBestOaLocation W32043719251 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2776277131 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2776814716 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2777602617 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2778000748 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2780795376 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C2781302539 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C121608353 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C126322002 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C141071460 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2776277131 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2776814716 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2777602617 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2778000748 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2778435480 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2778451229 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2780795376 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C2781302539 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C42219234 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C526805850 @default.
- W3204371925 hasConceptScore W3204371925C71924100 @default.
- W3204371925 hasIssue "Supplement_1" @default.
- W3204371925 hasLocation W32043719251 @default.
- W3204371925 hasOpenAccess W3204371925 @default.
- W3204371925 hasPrimaryLocation W32043719251 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W2068469916 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W2134806986 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W2145451192 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W2334604392 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W2360430513 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W3153296609 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W3174368246 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W3204371925 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W4323361002 @default.
- W3204371925 hasRelatedWork W3198261604 @default.
- W3204371925 hasVolume "114" @default.
- W3204371925 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3204371925 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3204371925 magId "3204371925" @default.
- W3204371925 workType "article" @default.