Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3204382503> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3204382503 endingPage "e28915" @default.
- W3204382503 startingPage "e28915" @default.
- W3204382503 abstract "High-frequency patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments are used to measure patients' symptoms after surgery for surgical research; however, the quality of those longitudinal PRO data has seldom been discussed.The aim of this study was to determine data quality-influencing factors and to profile error trajectories of data longitudinally collected via paper-and-pencil (P&P) or web-based assessment (electronic PRO [ePRO]) after thoracic surgery.We extracted longitudinal PRO data with 678 patients scheduled for lung surgery from an observational study (n=512) and a randomized clinical trial (n=166) on the evaluation of different perioperative care strategies. PROs were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Lung Cancer Module and single-item Quality of Life Scale before surgery and then daily after surgery until discharge or up to 14 days of hospitalization. Patient compliance and data error were identified and compared between P&P and ePRO. Generalized estimating equations model and 2-piecewise model were used to describe trajectories of error incidence over time and to identify the risk factors.Among 678 patients, 629 with at least 2 PRO assessments, 440 completed 3347 P&P assessments and 189 completed 1291 ePRO assessments. In total, 49.4% of patients had at least one error, including (1) missing items (64.69%, 1070/1654), (2) modifications without signatures (27.99%, 463/1654), (3) selection of multiple options (3.02%, 50/1654), (4) missing patient signatures (2.54%, 42/1654), (5) missing researcher signatures (1.45%, 24/1654), and (6) missing completion dates (0.30%, 5/1654). Patients who completed ePRO had fewer errors than those who completed P&P assessments (ePRO: 30.2% [57/189] vs. P&P: 57.7% [254/440]; P<.001). Compared with ePRO patients, those using P&P were older, less educated, and sicker. Common risk factors of having errors were a lower education level (P&P: odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.62; P<.001; ePRO: OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22-2.72; P=.003), treated in a provincial hospital (P&P: OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.10-5.33; P<.001; ePRO: OR 4.73, 95% CI 2.18-10.25; P<.001), and with severe disease (P&P: OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33-1.99; P<.001; ePRO: OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.53-4.75; P<.001). Errors peaked on postoperative day (POD) 1 for P&P, and on POD 2 for ePRO.It is possible to improve data quality of longitudinally collected PRO through ePRO, compared with P&P. However, ePRO-related sampling bias needs to be considered when designing clinical research using longitudinal PROs as major outcomes." @default.
- W3204382503 created "2021-10-11" @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5005271692 @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5024081468 @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5027619761 @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5035830647 @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5042317139 @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5084202149 @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5090079152 @default.
- W3204382503 creator A5091815180 @default.
- W3204382503 date "2021-11-09" @default.
- W3204382503 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3204382503 title "Data Quality of Longitudinally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Assessments" @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1549788499 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1567491469 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1582568988 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1869362176 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1925973161 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1957305559 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1976449159 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1978217292 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1980422089 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W1989467621 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2013095979 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2016841028 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2018025378 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2056650566 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2070309415 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2070366646 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2093274439 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2115495766 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2132295896 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2134256069 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2140892027 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2150171887 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2171648622 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2195040438 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2275737843 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2347096938 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2423702537 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2508705304 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2600915908 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2742180473 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2756376311 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2782908833 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2784985164 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2792445863 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2803318861 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2891042955 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2897496755 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2898372466 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2916367879 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2917511792 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2937337044 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2939388638 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2944294506 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2944434778 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2947387280 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2970984434 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2982437114 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2984564254 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W2997196097 @default.
- W3204382503 cites W3155733356 @default.
- W3204382503 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/28915" @default.
- W3204382503 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34751657" @default.
- W3204382503 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3204382503 type Work @default.
- W3204382503 sameAs 3204382503 @default.
- W3204382503 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W3204382503 countsByYear W32043825032022 @default.
- W3204382503 countsByYear W32043825032023 @default.
- W3204382503 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5005271692 @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5024081468 @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5027619761 @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5035830647 @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5042317139 @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5084202149 @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5090079152 @default.
- W3204382503 hasAuthorship W3204382503A5091815180 @default.
- W3204382503 hasBestOaLocation W32043825031 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C160022790 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConcept C9357733 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConceptScore W3204382503C105795698 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConceptScore W3204382503C126322002 @default.
- W3204382503 hasConceptScore W3204382503C141071460 @default.