FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3204493372> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3204493372 endingPage "232596712110338" @default.
• W3204493372 startingPage "232596712110338" @default.
• W3204493372 abstract "The slope of the tibial plateau has been proposed as a reason for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.To evaluate the interobserver reliability of measurements of tibial slope on radiographs versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and to assess whether the modalities can be used interchangeably for this purpose.Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.This retrospective study included 81 patients aged 18 to 30 years who were evaluated in a sports medicine setting for knee pain and who had lateral knee radiographs as well as knee MRI scans on file. Medial and lateral tibial plateau slope measurements were made by 3 blinded reviewers from the radiographs and MRI scans using graphic overlay software. The paired t test was used to compare measurements of the medial tibial plateau slope (MTPS) and lateral tibial plateau slope (LTPS) from radiographs and MRI scans. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine intra- and interobserver reliability of measurements within each imaging modality, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between measurements on radiographs versus MRI scans.Imaging from 81 patients were included. The average MTPS was significantly larger on radiographs compared with MRI scans (8.7° ± 3.6° vs 3.7° ± 3.4°; P < .001), and the average LTPS was also significantly larger on radiographs compared with MRI scans (7.9° ± 3.4° vs 5.7° ± 3.7°; P < .001). ICC values indicated good to excellent intraobserver agreement for all imaging modalities (ICC, 0.81-0.97; P ≤ .009). The ICCs for interobserver reliability of MTPS and LTPS measurements were 0.92 and 0.85 for radiographs, 0.87 and 0.83 for MRI based off the subchondral bone, and 0.86 and 0.71 for MRI based off the cartilage, respectively (P < .001). Medium correlation was noted between radiographic and MRI measurements; Pearson correlation coefficients for radiographic versus subchondral MRI measurements were 0.30 and 0.37 for MTPS and LTPS, respectively.The average MTPS and LTPS were significantly larger on radiographs compared with MRI scans. Although tibial slope measurements using radiography and those using MRI are reliable between individuals, the measurements from radiographs and MRI scans cannot be used interchangeably, and caution should be used when interpreting and comparing studies using measurements of the tibial slope." @default.
• W3204493372 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5005210351 @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5011999754 @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5028607801 @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5031819623 @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5038215111 @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5059308376 @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5070800157 @default.
• W3204493372 creator A5075619761 @default.
• W3204493372 date "2021-10-01" @default.
• W3204493372 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W3204493372 title "Reliability of Plain Radiographs Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Measure Tibial Slope in Sports Medicine Patients: Can They Be Used Interchangeably?" @default.
• W3204493372 cites W1531237901 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W1669252995 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W1910371025 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W1942070478 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W1977249941 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W1988825418 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2020787851 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2051159070 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2053829949 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2091257755 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2094762569 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2110872089 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2118090412 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2135424240 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2140361126 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2151830773 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2168511997 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2170050160 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2205523694 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2316059116 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2327037637 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2410438134 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W255652814 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2581551568 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2615061123 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2745094239 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2746069379 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2771913305 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2792743430 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2807135124 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2879645347 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2884621370 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2891871109 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2903589409 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W2911061774 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W3005946039 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W3096237739 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W3097641435 @default.
• W3204493372 cites W337110269 @default.
• W3204493372 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211033882" @default.
• W3204493372 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8504693" @default.
• W3204493372 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34646895" @default.
• W3204493372 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3204493372 type Work @default.
• W3204493372 sameAs 3204493372 @default.
• W3204493372 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3204493372 countsByYear W32044933722022 @default.
• W3204493372 countsByYear W32044933722023 @default.
• W3204493372 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5005210351 @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5011999754 @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5028607801 @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5031819623 @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5038215111 @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5059308376 @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5070800157 @default.
• W3204493372 hasAuthorship W3204493372A5075619761 @default.
• W3204493372 hasBestOaLocation W32044933721 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C104709138 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C126838900 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C143409427 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C171606756 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C2989005 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C36454342 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C70410870 @default.
• W3204493372 hasConceptScore W3204493372C71924100 @default.
• W3204493372 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W3204493372 hasLocation W32044933721 @default.
• W3204493372 hasLocation W32044933722 @default.
• W3204493372 hasLocation W32044933723 @default.
• W3204493372 hasLocation W32044933724 @default.
• W3204493372 hasOpenAccess W3204493372 @default.
• W3204493372 hasPrimaryLocation W32044933721 @default.
• W3204493372 hasRelatedWork W1568701304 @default.
• W3204493372 hasRelatedWork W1990741171 @default.
• W3204493372 hasRelatedWork W2073182685 @default.
• W3204493372 hasRelatedWork W2766682855 @default.

• next