FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3204659407> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3204659407 endingPage "203" @default.
• W3204659407 startingPage "193" @default.
• W3204659407 abstract "Objective assessment of dissection severity is difficult. Recognition of this has led to the creation of classification systems. This study investigated the performance of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and Kobayashi systems at differentiating severity of femoropopliteal dissection using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the reference standard. Comparison between the 2 systems and the inter- and intra-observer reliability were also investigated.Angiographic and IVUS imaging was assessed in 51 cases sourced from a RCT investigating the use of IVUS in femoropopliteal disease. A total of 2 readers independently scored the angiography images according to NHLBI and Kobayashi dissection classification systems and a consensus score was obtained for each system in each case. The NHLBI classification was condensed into 3 grades of dissection to allow comparison between systems. Dissection length, dissection arc, minimum lumen area, and lumen area stenosis were obtained from the IVUS imaging. IVUS parameters were compared between grades of severity for both systems. Agreement in grading between the systems was assessed and IVUS parameters for each level of dissection severity were compared between systems. Inter and intra-observer agreement tested for each system.Dissection was present on IVUS in 92.2% (47/51) of cases and angiography identified 78.7% (37/47) of these. No difference was present in any IVUS parameters between mild and severe dissections with either classification system. No difference in IVUS findings was present for the same grades of dissection between systems. The 2 systems agreed on severity grade in 47 of 51 cases. The inter-observer agreement was for NHLBI was k=0.549 and k=0.627 for Kobayashi. Intra-observer agreement for NHLBI was k=0.633 and k=0.633 and for Kobayashi was k=0.657 and k=0.297.The lack of difference in IVUS parameters between mild and severe dissection for the NHLBI and Kobayashi systems raises doubts about their ability to effectively differentiate dissection severity. Weak to moderate reliability suggests that variability in interpreting dissection may be higher than acceptable. IVUS imaging is more sensitive for detecting dissection than angiography and research is required to establish the value of adding IVUS to dissection classification systems." @default.
• W3204659407 created "2021-10-11" @default.
• W3204659407 creator A5008025809 @default.
• W3204659407 creator A5013195435 @default.
• W3204659407 creator A5048303948 @default.
• W3204659407 creator A5072710292 @default.
• W3204659407 date "2021-10-05" @default.
• W3204659407 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3204659407 title "Comparison of Angiographic Dissection Classification Systems in the Femoropopliteal Arteries Using IVUS Validation and Reliability Testing" @default.
• W3204659407 cites W122961614 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W1514973749 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W1709286512 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W1976760670 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W1976828621 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W1977671695 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2012092298 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2013407358 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2016406279 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2018045825 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2018675462 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2033762180 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2043014979 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2050497410 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2061813039 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2064133870 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2068502485 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2080713299 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2087840654 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2093363058 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2118020277 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2118202495 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2128041606 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2142051020 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2341068520 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2527471733 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2554140915 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2569906950 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2603363525 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2771233039 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2793608664 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2903318149 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2951717662 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W2998813391 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W3025486648 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W3068621524 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W3093647201 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W4241632381 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W4294214983 @default.
• W3204659407 cites W76788954 @default.
• W3204659407 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028211047952" @default.
• W3204659407 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34609223" @default.
• W3204659407 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3204659407 type Work @default.
• W3204659407 sameAs 3204659407 @default.
• W3204659407 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3204659407 countsByYear W32046594072023 @default.
• W3204659407 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3204659407 hasAuthorship W3204659407A5008025809 @default.
• W3204659407 hasAuthorship W3204659407A5013195435 @default.
• W3204659407 hasAuthorship W3204659407A5048303948 @default.
• W3204659407 hasAuthorship W3204659407A5072710292 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConcept C2776931568 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConceptScore W3204659407C126838900 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConceptScore W3204659407C2775862295 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConceptScore W3204659407C2776931568 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConceptScore W3204659407C2780007028 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConceptScore W3204659407C2780643987 @default.
• W3204659407 hasConceptScore W3204659407C71924100 @default.
• W3204659407 hasFunder F4320320442 @default.
• W3204659407 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3204659407 hasLocation W32046594071 @default.
• W3204659407 hasLocation W32046594072 @default.
• W3204659407 hasOpenAccess W3204659407 @default.
• W3204659407 hasPrimaryLocation W32046594071 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W135701433 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W1968487311 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W1975103433 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W1983132427 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W2031681723 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W2037254461 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W2041546033 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W2112247748 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W2761300508 @default.
• W3204659407 hasRelatedWork W3149886229 @default.
• W3204659407 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W3204659407 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3204659407 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3204659407 magId "3204659407" @default.
• W3204659407 workType "article" @default.