FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3205221605> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3205221605 endingPage "319" @default.
• W3205221605 startingPage "312" @default.
• W3205221605 abstract "El valor de las pruebas de filtración durante resecciones colorrectales para identificar fuga o sangrado de anastomosis no está establecido. Nuestro objetivo es comparar el impacto de la colonoscopia intraoperatoria (CIO) versus insuflación con jeringa como prueba de fuga en resección anterior baja para cáncer de recto, con respecto a la incidencia de filtración postoperatoria (FP). Estudio retrospectivo sobre base de datos prospectiva de 426 pacientes con cáncer de recto sometidos a resección anterior baja electiva desde enero de 2015 hasta diciembre de 2019. La prueba de fuga anastomótica se realizó a criterio del cirujano. La incidencia de FP se comparó entre pacientes sometidos a CIO y prueba con jeringa, utilizando el análisis de regresión logística, incluido el análisis de emparejamiento por puntaje estimado de propensión. Las características clínicas y morbimortalidad no mostraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos. En total fueron 422 pacientes, una vez excluidos 4. Se compararon 70 pacientes CIO frente a 352 con prueba con jeringa. La incidencia de FP fue del 5.7% en CIO y del 12.2% en el grupo control (p = 0.001). Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión (n = 221), equilibrando las características entre los grupos, la incidencia de FP fue del 5.7% en CIO y del 13.9% en el grupo con jeringa (p = 0.001). La CIO es un método seguro para evaluar la integridad de la anastomosis colorrectal y se asocia con un mayor porcentaje de estoma de protección, lo que parece disminuir el riesgo de FP. The value of leakage testing during colorectal resections to identify anastomotic leaks or bleeding has not been established. Our aim was to compare the impact of intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) versus insufflation with a syringe, as leakage testing in lower anterior resection for rectal cancer, with respect to the incidence of postoperative leakage (PL). A retrospective study utilizing a prospective database of 426 patients with rectal cancer that underwent elective lower anterior resection, within the time frame of January 2015 and December 2019, was conducted. The anastomotic leak test was chosen by the surgeon. The incidence of PL was compared between patients that underwent IOC and those that had the syringe leak test, utilizing the logistic regression analysis. Propensity score matching was included. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics or morbidity and mortality rates between the 2 groups. Four patients were excluded, leaving a patient total of 422. Seventy patients with IOC were compared with 352 that had the syringe leak test. The incidence of PL was 5.7% in the IOC group and 12.2% in the control group (P = .001). After propensity score matching (n = 221), balancing the characteristics between the groups, the incidence of PL was 5.7% in the IOC group and 13.9% in the syringe leak test group (P = .001). IOC was shown to be a safe method for evaluating the integrity of colorectal anastomosis and was associated with a higher percentage of protective stoma use, appearing to reduce the risk for PL." @default.
• W3205221605 created "2021-10-25" @default.
• W3205221605 creator A5005690629 @default.
• W3205221605 creator A5044095974 @default.
• W3205221605 creator A5052103918 @default.
• W3205221605 creator A5054733114 @default.
• W3205221605 creator A5067618276 @default.
• W3205221605 creator A5069857069 @default.
• W3205221605 creator A5078035112 @default.
• W3205221605 date "2022-07-01" @default.
• W3205221605 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3205221605 title "Impacto de la colonoscopia intraoperatoria en la detección y prevención de la fuga de la anastomosis colorrectal por cáncer de recto" @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2000746971 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2002274775 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2011363891 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2022142791 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2075739398 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2086727028 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2090596446 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2112865618 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2424891266 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2585232929 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2773700113 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2896139022 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2938072084 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2953550831 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2969548517 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W2998312849 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W3003319492 @default.
• W3205221605 cites W3004442570 @default.
• W3205221605 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmx.2021.02.010" @default.
• W3205221605 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3205221605 type Work @default.
• W3205221605 sameAs 3205221605 @default.
• W3205221605 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3205221605 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3205221605 hasAuthorship W3205221605A5005690629 @default.
• W3205221605 hasAuthorship W3205221605A5044095974 @default.
• W3205221605 hasAuthorship W3205221605A5052103918 @default.
• W3205221605 hasAuthorship W3205221605A5054733114 @default.
• W3205221605 hasAuthorship W3205221605A5067618276 @default.
• W3205221605 hasAuthorship W3205221605A5069857069 @default.
• W3205221605 hasAuthorship W3205221605A5078035112 @default.
• W3205221605 hasBestOaLocation W32052216051 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConceptScore W3205221605C142362112 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConceptScore W3205221605C15708023 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConceptScore W3205221605C29456083 @default.
• W3205221605 hasConceptScore W3205221605C71924100 @default.
• W3205221605 hasFunder F4320323197 @default.
• W3205221605 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3205221605 hasLocation W32052216051 @default.
• W3205221605 hasLocation W32052216052 @default.
• W3205221605 hasOpenAccess W3205221605 @default.
• W3205221605 hasPrimaryLocation W32052216051 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W1999344589 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W2789448498 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W3205221605 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W3205221605 hasVolume "87" @default.
• W3205221605 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3205221605 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3205221605 magId "3205221605" @default.
• W3205221605 workType "article" @default.