Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3205411901> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W3205411901 abstract "The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the application of Lexeme Based Theory on Urdu language, because it claims to engulf, the all aspects of all languages, through its Word Formation Rules (WFRs). In this article, Urdu nouns and adjectives are carefully selected and scrutinized for the processing of these rules. This theory asserts to be universal, because of its rules and declares that morphology enjoys its autonomous position due to these principles, and it does not get crippled to be shouldered by syntax for the building up of meaning. Roots are idiosyncratic and diversification of meaning is confined within the territories of the root, even after inflection and derivation; semantic restriction Isomorphic attributes do not let the root astray from its original meaning. So, on the one hand this theory talks about the integrity of the word (mental lexicon) and on the other side, it says that “phrase like structure do not give unified meaning” Aronoff; 1976. and the word categories (Parts of Speech) never appear like a phrase. They never leave their lexical bases, thus follow No Phrase Constraint (NPC) strictly. This research analysis these two rules and poses these proceeding questions; if Urdu language follows the NPC rule and from where does the Urdu roots inherit their meanings. For this purpose, few of the nouns and adjectives were selected. They were authenticated by the native speakers’ repertoire, and further their word categories and meanings were testified by consulting Urdu dictionaries. The results concluded that Urdu word formation, sometimes do not follow the NPC, thus put the lexical integrity of Aronoff (1976;2010) at stake. Secondly, Urdu language has many polysemic words and their meanings are not self-emergent, unless they are processed in a context (syntax). So, the autonomy of morphology is also defied. This research will be a good addition to many of the languages, where this theory is failed to be fully applicable, in spite of its recent revision." @default.
- W3205411901 created "2021-10-25" @default.
- W3205411901 creator A5023924057 @default.
- W3205411901 creator A5055482096 @default.
- W3205411901 creator A5065393930 @default.
- W3205411901 date "2020-01-01" @default.
- W3205411901 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3205411901 title "Revisiting Lexeme Based Theory’s Word Formation Rules; Counter Evidence From Urdu" @default.
- W3205411901 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3205411901 type Work @default.
- W3205411901 sameAs 3205411901 @default.
- W3205411901 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3205411901 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W3205411901 hasAuthorship W3205411901A5023924057 @default.
- W3205411901 hasAuthorship W3205411901A5055482096 @default.
- W3205411901 hasAuthorship W3205411901A5065393930 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C121934690 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C123406163 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C159403335 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C171078966 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C2775837122 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C2776224158 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C2777350258 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C2777509023 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConcept C60048249 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C121934690 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C123406163 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C138885662 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C15744967 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C159403335 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C171078966 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C204321447 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C2775837122 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C2776224158 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C2777350258 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C2777509023 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C2780876879 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C41008148 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C41895202 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C542102704 @default.
- W3205411901 hasConceptScore W3205411901C60048249 @default.
- W3205411901 hasLocation W32054119011 @default.
- W3205411901 hasOpenAccess W3205411901 @default.
- W3205411901 hasPrimaryLocation W32054119011 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W1914643253 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W196194102 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2022563720 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2060716886 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2069254976 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W213376089 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2301938056 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2319677084 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2339226303 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2346358901 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2359791668 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2476129793 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2548167838 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2969930012 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W3024510679 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W3082687447 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W86079039 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2102073455 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2509038386 @default.
- W3205411901 hasRelatedWork W2739181379 @default.
- W3205411901 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3205411901 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3205411901 magId "3205411901" @default.
- W3205411901 workType "article" @default.