FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3206299114> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3206299114 endingPage "2534" @default.
• W3206299114 startingPage "2532" @default.
• W3206299114 abstract "Minimally invasive surgical techniques, represented by endoscopic surgery, are one of the major advances in surgery during the 20th century. Based on the experience in other disciplines, breast surgeons have overcome the difficulties and developmental bottlenecks of endoscopic surgery in non-cavity organs, and operative techniques are maturing. The Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) identified the key issues in the clinical practice guidelines for endoscopic breast surgery in China through literature review and expert discussion, evaluated the quality of clinical research evidence according to the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system, and developed the CSBrS practice guidelines (2021 edition) with the aim of accessibility in the clinical practice of breast surgery in China. Level of Evidence and Recommendation Strength Level of evidence standard[1] XXXXXXX Recommendation strength standard[1] XXXXXXX Recommendation strength review committee There were 76 voting committee members for these guidelines: 63 from breast surgery departments (82.9%), four from medical oncology departments (5.3%), four from medical imaging departments (5.3%), two from a pathology department (2.6%), one from a radiotherapy department (1.3%), and two epidemiologists (2.6%). Target Audience Clinicians specializing in breast diseases in China. Recommendations Recommendation 1: Indications and contraindications for endoscopic breast surgery In the guidelines, endoscopic breast surgery includes: endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy ± immediate breast implant reconstruction for breast cancer, and endoscopic axillary or internal mammary lymph node dissection/sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. 1.1 Indications - Indications Level of evidence Strength of recommendation 1.1.1 Imaging data indicate that the tumor has not invaded the nipple, areola, or subcutaneous tissue, and the distance from the margin of the tumor to the margin of the areola is ≥2 cm[2–4] II A 1.1.2 Clinical and imaging examinations of early-stage breast cancer reveal axillary lymph nodes ≤cN1[5] I A 1.1.3 Internal mammary lymph node dissection/biopsy is necessary[6] II A 1.2 Contraindications - Contraindications Level of evidence Strength of recommendation 1.2.1 Severe mastoptosis[7] II A 1.2.2 Breast volume >500 mL[8] II A 1.2.3 History of axillary surgery[5] I A 1.2.4 Inflammatory breast cancer[9] II A Recommendation 2: Key clinical issues 2.1 Methods of establishing the operating space - Methods Level of evidence Strength of recommendation 2.1.1 Establish the operating space by liposuction and maintain the space with CO2 inflation or suspension[10] II A 2.1.2 Establish the operating space using a non-liposuction method and maintain the space with CO2 inflation or suspension[11,12] II A 2.1.3 Operation under the guidance of entire-course monitoring[4] II A 2.1.4 Prevent hypercapnia through continuous positive-pressure ventilation[13] II A 2.2 Treating surgical complications - Treatments Level of evidence Strength of recommendation 2.2.1 Convert to open surgery in cases of intra-operative hemorrhage of unknown cause[14,15] II A 2.2.2 Endoscopic exploration or open hemostatic surgery for post-operative active bleeding[16] II A Discussion Reports state that endoscopic surgery can complete the same breast surgical operation through small and occult incisions, with the advantages of less bleeding, faster recovery, and better post-operative appearance. Endoscopic surgery is superior to conventional surgery regarding post-operative patients’ physical and psychological rehabilitation. Currently, many hospitals in China have used endoscopic techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection, nipple-sparing total mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, and partial mammaplasty and breast reconstruction for breast cancer. The application of endoscopic techniques in the treatment of breast cancer has received extensive attention and active exploration in clinical practice. However, there is still a lack of high-level evidence. Based on a literature review, the panel experts re-evaluated the quality of clinical research evidence concerning endoscopic surgical techniques for breast cancer in accordance with the GRADE method, and compiled the guidelines with the goal of accessibility in the clinical practice of breast surgery in China, to provide a reference for the clinical work of Chinese breast surgeons. After in-depth discussions, the panel experts reached the consensus that endoscopic techniques have been widely used in clinical surgery and provide clinical benefits, and for their use in breast surgery in China, multi-center studies should be conducted as soon as possible to provide high-level evidence. Previous studies have shown that the safety of endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection is not inferior to that of open surgery.[17] Along with the introduction of high-definition endoscopic equipment, the anatomical structure of the axilla under endoscopy is clearer, which can minimize injury to the axillary nerves, blood vessels, and lymphatic vessels; thus, effectively improving patients’ quality of life.[18] Among patients with breast cancer, increasing attention has been paid to the diagnosis and treatment of internal mammary lymph node metastases. For patients with indications, internal mammary lymph node dissection using endoscopic techniques has been successful in China. Endoscopic internal mammary lymph node biopsy or dissection via the thoracic approach provides a better operating space and visual field; thus, avoiding injury caused by removing the costal cartilage.[19] Breast-conserving surgery has not been widely applied in China. Increasing the proportion of breastconserving surgery in Chinese patients with early-stage breast cancer should be a priority for breast surgeons. Recently, precise local extended resection has been achieved by endoscopic surgery under the guidance of intra-operative ultrasonographic positioning + the vacuum-assisted Mammotome system or margin-labeling with dye in early-stage breast cancer, which achieves the key technical points of breast-conserving surgery. Compared with conventional open surgery, endoscopic surgery provides the optimal breast-conserving effect,[20] indicating a new direction in breast-conserving surgery. Endoscopic surgery also provides advantages in breast reconstruction. In particular, breast reconstruction with prosthesis implantation is used mainly after total mastectomy. The incidence of perioperative complications is relatively low in patients receiving endoscopic subcutaneous gland resection + immediate breast reconstruction with prosthesis implantation.[7,21] With endoscopic assistance, the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap can be harvested with adequate tissue, comparable to conventional surgery, which avoids large surgical scars on the back and providing superior cosmetics and minimally invasive effects compared with conventional surgery.[22] Subcutaneous gland resection and latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap transfer for breast reconstruction can be completed endoscopically, and provides better cosmetic effect and a minimally invasive approach and reduces the risk of complications, such as post-operative bleeding, edema, ecchymosis, seroma, and infection.[23] The safety of endoscopic breast reconstruction with a pedicled greater omentum has also been investigated.[24] The current status of endoscopic breast surgery in medical institutions in China and abroad is uneven. To standardize the clinical applications of endoscopic surgery for breast cancer in China, the CSBrS published the “Consensus Statements and Operation Guidelines on Endoscopic Surgery for Breast Cancer” in 2019.[4] According to the consensus, breast surgeons who perform endoscopic surgery should receive standardized training; master the basic principles and practice these, stepwise; and avoid additional trauma to patients owing to blind pursuit of surgical effects. High-level evidence pertaining to endoscopic surgery for breast cancer treatment is still lacking. Despite the extensive application of endoscopic breast surgery worldwide, treatment standardization and application promotion remain difficult. Appendix Basic operation for endoscopic surgery for breast cancer (https://links.lww.com/CM9/A633). Conflicts of interest The expert committee for these guidelines declares no conflicts of interest. These guidelines are a reference for breast disease specialists in clinical practice. However, the guidelines are not to be used as the basis for medical evaluation, and do not play an arbitrating role in the handling of any medical disputes. The guidelines are not a reference for patients or non-breast specialists. The Chinese Society of Breast Surgery assumes no responsibility for results involving the inappropriate application of these guidelines, and reserves the right to interpret and revise the guidelines." @default.
• W3206299114 created "2021-10-25" @default.
• W3206299114 creator A5008204710 @default.
• W3206299114 creator A5017393438 @default.
• W3206299114 creator A5038711316 @default.
• W3206299114 creator A5043819331 @default.
• W3206299114 creator A5055435856 @default.
• W3206299114 creator A5071975498 @default.
• W3206299114 date "2021-10-19" @default.
• W3206299114 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3206299114 title "Clinical practice guidelines for endoscopic breast surgery in patients with early-stage breast cancer: Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) practice guidelines 2021" @default.
• W3206299114 cites W1778602875 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W1891092690 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W1970039881 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2004766521 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2008044995 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2070342356 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2095982742 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2099931475 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2114574348 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2333474415 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2340563229 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2581563251 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2599077815 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W2734818302 @default.
• W3206299114 cites W3144478439 @default.
• W3206299114 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001592" @default.
• W3206299114 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8577676" @default.
• W3206299114 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34670243" @default.
• W3206299114 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3206299114 type Work @default.
• W3206299114 sameAs 3206299114 @default.
• W3206299114 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3206299114 countsByYear W32062991142022 @default.
• W3206299114 countsByYear W32062991142023 @default.
• W3206299114 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3206299114 hasAuthorship W3206299114A5008204710 @default.
• W3206299114 hasAuthorship W3206299114A5017393438 @default.
• W3206299114 hasAuthorship W3206299114A5038711316 @default.
• W3206299114 hasAuthorship W3206299114A5043819331 @default.
• W3206299114 hasAuthorship W3206299114A5055435856 @default.
• W3206299114 hasAuthorship W3206299114A5071975498 @default.
• W3206299114 hasBestOaLocation W32062991141 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C2777704003 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C2779974597 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C121608353 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C126322002 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C141071460 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C146357865 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C151730666 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C2777704003 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C2779974597 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C512399662 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C530470458 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C61434518 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C71924100 @default.
• W3206299114 hasConceptScore W3206299114C86803240 @default.
• W3206299114 hasIssue "21" @default.
• W3206299114 hasLocation W32062991141 @default.
• W3206299114 hasLocation W32062991142 @default.
• W3206299114 hasLocation W32062991143 @default.
• W3206299114 hasLocation W32062991144 @default.
• W3206299114 hasLocation W32062991145 @default.
• W3206299114 hasLocation W32062991146 @default.
• W3206299114 hasOpenAccess W3206299114 @default.
• W3206299114 hasPrimaryLocation W32062991141 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W2383553971 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W3028761021 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W3028812190 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W3206299114 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W3206299114 hasVolume "134" @default.
• W3206299114 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3206299114 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3206299114 magId "3206299114" @default.
• W3206299114 workType "article" @default.