FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3206485037> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3206485037 endingPage "e23210" @default.
• W3206485037 startingPage "e23210" @default.
• W3206485037 abstract "Medical blogs have become valuable information sources for patients and caregivers. Most research has focused on patients' creation of blogs as therapy. But we know less about how these blogs affect their readers and what format of information influences readers to take preventative health actions.This study aimed to identify how reading patient medical blogs influences readers' perceived health risk and their intentions to engage in preventative health actions. Further, we aimed to examine the format of the medical blog and the reader's response.We surveyed 99 university participants and a general-population, online panel of 167 participants. Both studies randomly assigned participants to conditions and measured blog evaluation, intentions for preventative health action, and evaluation of health risk and beliefs, and allowed open-ended comments. The second study used a different sample and added a control condition. A third study used a convenience sample of blog readers to evaluate the link between reading medical blogs and taking preventative health action.Across 3 studies, participants indicated a desire to take future preventative health action after reading patient blogs. Studies 1 and 2 used experimental scenario-based designs, while Study 3 employed a qualitative design with real blog readers. The 2 experimental studies showed that the type of blog impacted intentions to engage in future preventative health actions (Study 1: F2,96=6.08, P=.003; Study 2: F3,166=2.59, P=.06), with a statistical blog being most effective in both studies and a personal narrative blog showing similar effectiveness in Study 2, contrary to some prior research. The readers' perceptions of their own health risk did not impact the relationship between the blog type and health intentions. In contrast, in one study, participants' judgments about the barriers they might face to accessing care improved the fit of the model (F2,95=13.57, P<.001). In Study 3's sample of medical blog readers, 53% (24/45) reported taking preventative health action after reading a health blog, including performing a self-check, asking a doctor about their health risk, or requesting a screening test. Additionally, these readers expressed that they read the blogs to follow the author (patient) and to learn general health information. All studies demonstrated the blogs were somewhat sad and emotional but also informative and well-written. They noted that the blogs made them appreciate life more and motivated them to consider taking some action regarding their health.Reading patient blogs influences intentions to take future health actions. However, blog formats show different efficacy, and the readers' disease risk perceptions do not. Physicians, medical practitioners, and health organizations may find it useful to curate or promote selected medical blogs to influence patient behavior." @default.
• W3206485037 created "2021-10-25" @default.
• W3206485037 creator A5006129599 @default.
• W3206485037 creator A5029381562 @default.
• W3206485037 date "2021-12-22" @default.
• W3206485037 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3206485037 title "Impact of Medical Blog Reading and Information Presentation on Readers’ Preventative Health Intentions: Mixed Methods, Multistudy Investigation" @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1915853078 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1963858955 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1966976587 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1970799350 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1972067751 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1972609814 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1982178402 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1984798263 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W1998778493 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2005027920 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2008133916 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2016074419 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2030102835 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2030998171 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2067728341 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2074338112 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2080687851 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2083904749 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2096193340 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2117512639 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2135498674 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2139333375 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2159375797 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2323621808 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2560564607 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2623703952 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2736690871 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2766352063 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2779604105 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2799693789 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2850319609 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W2988464799 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W3041715891 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W3122744964 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W3124896223 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W4236729266 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W4244463524 @default.
• W3206485037 cites W4294214983 @default.
• W3206485037 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/23210" @default.
• W3206485037 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34941543" @default.
• W3206485037 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3206485037 type Work @default.
• W3206485037 sameAs 3206485037 @default.
• W3206485037 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3206485037 countsByYear W32064850372023 @default.
• W3206485037 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3206485037 hasAuthorship W3206485037A5006129599 @default.
• W3206485037 hasAuthorship W3206485037A5029381562 @default.
• W3206485037 hasBestOaLocation W32064850371 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C2778843546 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C108827166 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C121332964 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C15744967 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C160735492 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C162324750 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C17744445 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C199539241 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C2778843546 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C2780791683 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C41008148 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C50522688 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C509550671 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C554936623 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C62520636 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C71924100 @default.
• W3206485037 hasConceptScore W3206485037C75630572 @default.
• W3206485037 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W3206485037 hasLocation W32064850371 @default.
• W3206485037 hasLocation W32064850372 @default.
• W3206485037 hasLocation W32064850373 @default.
• W3206485037 hasOpenAccess W3206485037 @default.
• W3206485037 hasPrimaryLocation W32064850371 @default.
• W3206485037 hasRelatedWork W1151199228 @default.
• W3206485037 hasRelatedWork W1971288970 @default.
• W3206485037 hasRelatedWork W2514219309 @default.
• W3206485037 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.

• next