Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3207657071> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3207657071 endingPage "e30495" @default.
- W3207657071 startingPage "e30495" @default.
- W3207657071 abstract "In a previous study, a prototype mobile health (mHealth) app was co-designed with patients, family physicians, and researchers to enhance self-management and optimize conservative management for patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA).This study aims to evaluate the overall usability, quality, and effectiveness of the mHealth app prototype for aiding knee OA self-management from the perspectives of patients with OA and health care providers (HCPs).Using methods triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data, we conducted a pilot evaluation of an mHealth app prototype that was codeveloped with patients and HCPs. We recruited adult patients aged ≥20 years with early knee OA (n=18) who experienced knee pain on most days of the month at any time in the past and HCPs (n=7) to participate. In the qualitative assessment, patient and HCP perspectives were elicited on the likeability and usefulness of app features and functionalities and the perceived impact of the app on patient-HCP communication. The quantitative assessment involved evaluating the app using usability, quality, and effectiveness metrics. Patient baseline assessments included a semistructured interview and survey to gather demographics and assess the quality of life (European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L]) and patient activation (patient activation measure [PAM]). Following the 6-week usability trial period, a follow-up survey assessed patients' perceptions of app usability and quality and longitudinal changes in quality of life and patient activation. Semistructured interviews and surveys were also conducted with HCPs (n=7) at baseline to evaluate the usability and quality of the app prototype.Interviews with patients and HCPs revealed overall positive impressions of the app prototype features and functionalities related to likeability and usefulness. Between the baseline and follow-up patient assessments, the mean EQ-5D-5L scores improved from 0.77 to 0.67 (P=.04), and PAM scores increased from 80.4 to 87.9 (P=.01). Following the 6-week evaluation, patients reported a mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 57.8, indicating marginal acceptability according to SUS cutoffs. The mean number of goals set during the usability period was 2.47 (SD 3.08), and the mean number of activities completed for knee OA self-management during the study period was 22.2 (SD 17.8). Spearman rank correlation (rs) calculations revealed that the follow-up PAM scores were weakly correlated (rs=-0.32) with the number of goals achieved and the number (rs=0.19) of activities performed during the 6-week usability period. HCPs reported a mean SUS score of 39.1, indicating unacceptable usability.This evidence-based and patient-centered app prototype represents a potential use of mHealth for improving outcomes and enhancing conservative care by promoting patient activation and patient-HCP communication regarding OA management. However, future iterations of the app prototype are required to address the limitations related to usability and quality." @default.
- W3207657071 created "2021-10-25" @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5000374842 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5005101198 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5007626204 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5019171604 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5028911366 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5049401142 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5052603540 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5059591949 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5061301032 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5071041144 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5082443415 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5084799171 @default.
- W3207657071 creator A5087862938 @default.
- W3207657071 date "2021-11-25" @default.
- W3207657071 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3207657071 title "Patients’ Use of Mobile Health for Self-management of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results of a 6-Week Pilot Study" @default.
- W3207657071 cites W1500254997 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W1778362155 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W1920440015 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W1985338246 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2041927436 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2047559973 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2075016831 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2097950056 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2099179846 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2099473180 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2106114209 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2109031474 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2113670619 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2122435770 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2127753873 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2133674686 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2142564124 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2156196376 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2317794853 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2395164927 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2414769199 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2534471575 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2547757901 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2568974466 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2570269089 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2608470733 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2612879930 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2746256962 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2766891106 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2768738777 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2770289357 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2793350103 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2824156522 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2894885260 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2912499971 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2955666772 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2970850607 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W2975988335 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W3008799005 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W3041753706 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W3110257691 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W3132534209 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W3134221810 @default.
- W3207657071 cites W574700118 @default.
- W3207657071 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/30495" @default.
- W3207657071 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34842526" @default.
- W3207657071 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3207657071 type Work @default.
- W3207657071 sameAs 3207657071 @default.
- W3207657071 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3207657071 countsByYear W32076570712022 @default.
- W3207657071 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5000374842 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5005101198 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5007626204 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5019171604 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5028911366 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5049401142 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5052603540 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5059591949 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5061301032 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5071041144 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5082443415 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5084799171 @default.
- W3207657071 hasAuthorship W3207657071A5087862938 @default.
- W3207657071 hasBestOaLocation W32076570711 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C139225968 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C2776933761 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C2779279471 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C2779363104 @default.
- W3207657071 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.