FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3207788345> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3207788345 endingPage "226" @default.
• W3207788345 startingPage "220" @default.
• W3207788345 abstract "Összefoglaló. A humán kutatások eredményeit bemutató közlemények számos adattal szolgálnak a megismerni kívánt jelenségre vonatkozóan. Általánosan elfogadott elvárás a vonatkozó etikai szabályok szigorú betartása, az előírt vizsgálati protokollok betartása. Az emberekkel végzett vizsgálatoknak azonban van egy olyan dimenziója, amelyre az etikai szabályok nem térnek ki, s amelyek a vizsgálati eredményeket, illetve azok reprezentativitását is befolyásolják. Ezek mindegyike a pszichológia vizsgálódási területéhez tartozik, legyen szó a pszichológiai kutatások etikai kérdéseiről, vagy az orvosbiológiai kutatások, orvosi beavatkozások, illetve azok elfogadásának pszichológiai aspektusairól. A tanulmány a pszichológia megváltozott etikai felfogásának rövid bemutatását követően a genetikai kutatások pszichológiai aspektusait és az egészség-magatartás kritikus kérdéseit elemzi. Az utóbbiak esetében a kockázatészlelés, valamint a bizalom, megbízhatóság pszichológiai modelljeiből kiindulva mutatja be az oltási hajlandóság és az oltásellenesség ismert pszichológiai faktorait. Summary. Publications presenting the results of human research provide a wealth of data on the phenomenon to be explored. It is a generally accepted expectation to adhere strictly to the relevant ethical rules and to the required protocols. However, studies in humans have a dimension that is not fully covered by ethical rules and that also affects the studies’ results and their representativeness. All of these belong to the field of research in psychology, be it the ethical issues of psychological research or the psychological aspects of biomedical research, medical interventions, and their acceptance. Researchers of these and other scientific areas widely believe that science is morally neutral, that is, its task is the discovery of facts, the further development of the investigations’ tools and methods to perform correct analysis and draw reliable conclusions. However, research and development are characterized by a kind of moral neutrality, the essence of which is that the researcher not participating in the decisions on applications is neutral in general. This means that the curiosity driven research should not pay attention to risks associated with the use of results. However, many recent concerns related to the long-term effects of broadly applied inventions speaks for the need on consensus how the consequences could or should be forecasted. Following a brief presentation of the changed ethical perception of psychology, I give some examples on the psychological aspects of genetic research and that of the critical issues in health behavior. Concerns psychological in nature have been articulated in the last decade and it became increasingly clear that genetic testing can also have psychological factors that must be considered. Moreover, the recent focus on psychological aspects of human research shed light on the complexity of health behavior, and questions have been raised about the known psychological factors of the human reactions to suggested therapies, especially those of the vaccination propensity, rejection, and anti-vaccination movements. Although there are only a few systematic studies on this issue, the proper solutions of the Covid-19 should consider the psychological aspects of the acceptance and rejection of vaccination. We may consider that the first waves of the Covid-19 epidemic created situations requiring altered psychological coping, to which psychological research responded primarily by examining the epidemiological situation, illness, and the resulting psychological aspects of lifestyle (treatment of social isolation, stress management, anxiety, depression). Therefore, scientific data on risk perception and psychological factors of vaccine acceptance may contribute to preparedness for globally predicted epidemics and decision-making processes." @default.
• W3207788345 created "2021-10-25" @default.
• W3207788345 creator A5026792892 @default.
• W3207788345 date "2021-10-10" @default.
• W3207788345 modified "2023-10-08" @default.
• W3207788345 title "Túl az etikán – a humán kutatások kockázatérzékenysége és pszichológiai aspektusai" @default.
• W3207788345 cites W1965704156 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W1969900674 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W1975230024 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W1985071008 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2005542483 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2008397769 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2008634893 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2009363102 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2027801399 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2031944965 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2043422134 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2062499335 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2067187242 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2081347231 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2081434432 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2108771400 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2117186187 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2117485795 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2129419668 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2134740567 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2139237735 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2145208070 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2168955200 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2296061379 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2299533639 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2442617842 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2522316668 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2735262155 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2759725717 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2795688818 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W2904829056 @default.
• W3207788345 cites W3124896223 @default.
• W3207788345 doi "https://doi.org/10.1556/112.2021.00059" @default.
• W3207788345 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3207788345 type Work @default.
• W3207788345 sameAs 3207788345 @default.
• W3207788345 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3207788345 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3207788345 hasAuthorship W3207788345A5026792892 @default.
• W3207788345 hasBestOaLocation W32077883451 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConcept C23161992 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConcept C554144382 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConceptScore W3207788345C138885662 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConceptScore W3207788345C142362112 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConceptScore W3207788345C23161992 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConceptScore W3207788345C29456083 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConceptScore W3207788345C52119013 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConceptScore W3207788345C554144382 @default.
• W3207788345 hasConceptScore W3207788345C71924100 @default.
• W3207788345 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3207788345 hasLocation W32077883451 @default.
• W3207788345 hasLocation W32077883452 @default.
• W3207788345 hasLocation W32077883453 @default.
• W3207788345 hasOpenAccess W3207788345 @default.
• W3207788345 hasPrimaryLocation W32077883451 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W1999344589 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W2789448498 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W3207788345 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W3207788345 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W3207788345 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3207788345 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3207788345 magId "3207788345" @default.
• W3207788345 workType "article" @default.