FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3208080549> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3208080549 endingPage "S604" @default.
• W3208080549 startingPage "S604" @default.
• W3208080549 abstract "Introduction: Occupational noise exposure can lead to noise-induced hearing loss (NHL) with serious health and economic consequences for workers. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) have published a recommended exposure limit of 85-decibels (dB) for workplace exposure to prevent NHL. Despite these recommendations for workplace noise exposure, little is known about the noise levels generated during gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. We aimed to investigate the noise generated by suction during GI endoscopy. Methods: Sound levels were measured using the “NIOSH Sound Level Meter” smart phone application. The noise generated from an adult colonoscope (Olympus HQ190) at various levels of suction were measured using Neptune 3 (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) mobile surgical suction device (SSD) that allows a wide range of suction pressure levels versus “traditional” wall suction (WS). Measurements were obtained as average levels over a 30-second interval in a quiet, outpatient ambulatory endoscopy room. Noise measurements were obtained at various positions within the room (endoscopist, nurse/ technician) as well as next to the endoscope suction button. The measurements were obtained with the endoscopist applying no suction, partial suction and complete suction. Results: With the SSD, sound levels increased as suction pressure increased. The highest sound levels were generated when no endoscopic suction was applied. None of the measurements exceeded recommended exposure limits set by the NIOSH (Table 1). With pressure levels set at 200 mmHg (traditional wall suction maximums) sound levels at the endoscopist for SSD and WS were 54.3 dB and 47.1 dB, respectively, e.g. more than 7 times louder. Conclusion: Little is known about the occupational safety of noise levels in endoscopy nor the contribution suction contributes. In this study, noise levels did not exceed the recommended exposure limit set by the NIOSH. However, SSD generates significantly more noise than WS at the same pressure levels. While these levels may not constitute an occupational hazard, they make communication more difficult especially in the COVID era of enhanced PPE (e.g. face shield, N95). The techniques developed during the study offer a simple process that can be implemented in any GI endoscopy suite to assess the contributions of suction to workplace noise.." @default.
• W3208080549 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3208080549 creator A5009252811 @default.
• W3208080549 creator A5021764450 @default.
• W3208080549 creator A5026262329 @default.
• W3208080549 creator A5035915007 @default.
• W3208080549 creator A5065527380 @default.
• W3208080549 creator A5087128295 @default.
• W3208080549 date "2021-10-01" @default.
• W3208080549 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3208080549 title "S1310 Assessing Occupational Noise Generated from Surgical Suction Devices vs Traditional Wall Suction in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Quality Improvement Project" @default.
• W3208080549 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000778772.59082.b6" @default.
• W3208080549 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3208080549 type Work @default.
• W3208080549 sameAs 3208080549 @default.
• W3208080549 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3208080549 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3208080549 hasAuthorship W3208080549A5009252811 @default.
• W3208080549 hasAuthorship W3208080549A5021764450 @default.
• W3208080549 hasAuthorship W3208080549A5026262329 @default.
• W3208080549 hasAuthorship W3208080549A5035915007 @default.
• W3208080549 hasAuthorship W3208080549A5065527380 @default.
• W3208080549 hasAuthorship W3208080549A5087128295 @default.
• W3208080549 hasBestOaLocation W32080805491 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C23795335 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConcept C99498987 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C115961682 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C127413603 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C141071460 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C154945302 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C23795335 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C2778451229 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C41008148 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C71924100 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C78519656 @default.
• W3208080549 hasConceptScore W3208080549C99498987 @default.
• W3208080549 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3208080549 hasLocation W32080805491 @default.
• W3208080549 hasLocation W32080805492 @default.
• W3208080549 hasOpenAccess W3208080549 @default.
• W3208080549 hasPrimaryLocation W32080805491 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W3208080549 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W3208080549 hasVolume "116" @default.
• W3208080549 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3208080549 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3208080549 magId "3208080549" @default.
• W3208080549 workType "article" @default.