FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3208163979> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3208163979 endingPage "1113" @default.
• W3208163979 startingPage "1103" @default.
• W3208163979 abstract "Abstract Background The evaluation of hindlimb lameness remains a major challenge in everyday clinical practice. In the absence of clear guidelines, veterinarians use different visual assessment methods for this task whose robustness is unknown. Objectives Determination of the robustness of five visual hindlimb lameness assessment methods based on the comparison of left and right tuber coxae movement. Study design Validated mathematical hindlimb lameness model based on experimental data from the literature. Methods Vertical movement of left (LTC) and right (RTC) tuber coxae was simulated for the range of common hindlimb lameness movement patterns that horses present within practice. Lameness severity ranged from sound to moderately lame (0% to 60% motion asymmetry). The scenarios of a pelvis held tilted and asymmetrical pelvic roll were included to reflect possible adaptations in pelvic rotation. Across all conditions, the outcomes for five different visual assessment methods based on comparative tubera coxarum movement were quantified, including hip hike, ‐drop and range of motion. The robustness of each assessment method was established through comparison to sacrum‐based overall motion asymmetry as the ground truth. Results Tubera coxarum‐based lameness assessment was highly sensitive to all the unique lameness patterns and changes in pelvic rotation which a lame horse may adopt. None of the five visual lameness assessment methods was 100% robust across all conditions tested. For everyday clinical practice, comparing the upward movement amplitude of the RTC before right hind foot contact and of the LTC before left hind foot contact (Hip_hike_diff) would be the most robust single tubera coxarum‐based visual assessment method. Main limitations In the absence of published data regarding the frequency of different movement patterns and hip rotation adaptations in clinical practice, this study cannot indicate the proportion of assessments that would be incorrect for a given visual assessment method. Conclusions Using a single tubera coxarum‐based visual hindlimb lameness assessment method may lead to incorrect clinical judgement. Therefore, using multiple assessment methods would be beneficial to substantiate impressions." @default.
• W3208163979 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3208163979 creator A5012706673 @default.
• W3208163979 creator A5056893140 @default.
• W3208163979 date "2021-12-13" @default.
• W3208163979 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3208163979 title "Robustness of five different visual assessment methods for the evaluation of hindlimb lameness based on tubera coxarum movement in horses at the trot on a straight line" @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1624602477 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1863297596 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1893767865 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1919531772 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1940147005 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1965247188 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1994442501 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W1995519992 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2001160434 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2003723185 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2023444884 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2046761608 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2050549776 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2056563739 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2078369386 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2099942680 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2105017840 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2113186466 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2115104053 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2119513390 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2127030454 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2152518278 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2168763480 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2323175588 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2485300806 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2795035295 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W2890477366 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W3006935079 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W3208163979 @default.
• W3208163979 cites W4239607618 @default.
• W3208163979 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13531" @default.
• W3208163979 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34717008" @default.
• W3208163979 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3208163979 type Work @default.
• W3208163979 sameAs 3208163979 @default.
• W3208163979 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3208163979 countsByYear W32081639792021 @default.
• W3208163979 countsByYear W32081639792022 @default.
• W3208163979 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3208163979 hasAuthorship W3208163979A5012706673 @default.
• W3208163979 hasAuthorship W3208163979A5056893140 @default.
• W3208163979 hasBestOaLocation W32081639791 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C2779771469 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C51738704 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C63479239 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C104317684 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C105702510 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C141071460 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C1862650 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C2779771469 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C51738704 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C55493867 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C60465272 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C63479239 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C71924100 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C86803240 @default.
• W3208163979 hasConceptScore W3208163979C99508421 @default.
• W3208163979 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3208163979 hasLocation W32081639791 @default.
• W3208163979 hasLocation W32081639792 @default.
• W3208163979 hasLocation W32081639793 @default.
• W3208163979 hasOpenAccess W3208163979 @default.
• W3208163979 hasPrimaryLocation W32081639791 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W2004724015 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W2016533312 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W2018062889 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W2165568632 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W2529373968 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W2914966445 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W4310995375 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W4322620908 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W4361826065 @default.
• W3208163979 hasRelatedWork W4380204504 @default.
• W3208163979 hasVolume "54" @default.
• W3208163979 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3208163979 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3208163979 magId "3208163979" @default.
• W3208163979 workType "article" @default.