FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3208280119> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3208280119 endingPage "e12192" @default.
• W3208280119 startingPage "e12192" @default.
• W3208280119 abstract "Reduced tactile acuity has been observed in several chronic pain conditions and has been proposed as a clinical indicator of somatosensory impairments related to the condition. As some interventions targeting these impairments have resulted in pain reduction, assessing tactile acuity may have significant clinical potential. While two-point discrimination threshold (TPDT) is a popular method of assessing tactile acuity, large measurement error has been observed (impeding responsiveness) and its validity has been questioned. The recently developed semi-automated 'imprint Tactile Acuity Device' (iTAD) may improve tactile acuity assessment, but clinimetric properties of its scores (accuracy score, response time and rate correct score) need further examination.Experiment 1: To determine inter-rater reliability and measurement error of TPDT and iTAD assessments. Experiment 2: To determine internal consistencies and floor or ceiling effects of iTAD scores, and investigate effects of age, sex, and anthropometry on performance.Experiment 1: To assess inter-rater reliability (ICC(2,1)) and measurement error (coefficient of variation (CoV)), three assessors each performed TPDT and iTAD assessments at the neck in forty healthy participants. Experiment 2: To assess internal consistency (ICC(2,k)) and floor or ceiling effects (skewness z-scores), one hundred healthy participants performed the iTAD's localisation and orientation tests. Balanced for sex, participants were equally divided over five age brackets (18-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60 and 61-70). Age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and neck surface area were assessed to examine their direct (using multiple linear regression analysis) and indirect (using sequential mediation analysis) relationship with iTAD scores.Mean ICC(2,1) was moderate for TPDT (0.70) and moderate-to-good for the various iTAD scores (0.65-0.86). The CoV was 25.3% for TPDT and ranged from 6.1% to 16.5% for iTAD scores. Internal consistency was high for both iTAD accuracy scores (ICC(2,6) = 0.84; ICC(2,4) = 0.86). No overt floor or ceiling effects were detected (all skewness z-scores < 3.29). Accuracy scores were only directly related to age (decreasing with increasing age) and sex (higher for men).Although reliability was similar, iTAD scores demonstrated less measurement error than TPDT indicating a potential for better responsiveness to treatment effects. Further, unlike previously reported for TPDT, iTAD scores appeared independent of anthropometry, which simplifies interpretation. Additionally, the iTAD assesses multiple aspects of tactile processing which may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of tactile acuity. Taken together, the iTAD shows promise in measuring tactile acuity, but patient studies are needed to verify clinical relevance." @default.
• W3208280119 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3208280119 creator A5002603484 @default.
• W3208280119 creator A5032753600 @default.
• W3208280119 creator A5035724229 @default.
• W3208280119 creator A5038796650 @default.
• W3208280119 creator A5056858801 @default.
• W3208280119 creator A5075437604 @default.
• W3208280119 date "2021-10-25" @default.
• W3208280119 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3208280119 title "Modernising tactile acuity assessment; clinimetrics of semi-automated tests and effects of age, sex and anthropometry on performance" @default.
• W3208280119 cites W1966372909 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W1973253631 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W1974779790 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W1990647938 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W1993706986 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W1995698477 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2005857000 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2012265686 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2015572233 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2022335610 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2027129072 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2027516897 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2028553362 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2034155621 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2041660097 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2060230035 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2063083915 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2065026050 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2065824521 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2068326028 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2069500905 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2076357536 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2081914368 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2090593039 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2096632664 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2096798319 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2097120903 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2097935215 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2098082628 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2099156550 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2102161906 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2102488911 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2103660174 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2105374537 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2105801395 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2106588709 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2108086308 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2110624480 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2114608212 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2115988342 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2116393819 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2120929981 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2122463941 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2124381750 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2124947201 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2125895779 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2129396254 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2147436961 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2152117240 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2154538376 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2227377677 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2279374695 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2295447624 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2344960909 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2439064384 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2478660142 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2542987740 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2560403276 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2601552098 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2613578380 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2623703952 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2665733304 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2742041238 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2744878226 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2751343416 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2767464829 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2769165859 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2790306637 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2795005457 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2811124434 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2894802301 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2898206292 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2901802562 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2915410736 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2924035499 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2949075372 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2950800651 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2978215950 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W2987344764 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W3003367972 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W3008823339 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W3015495278 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W3086530863 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W3134699230 @default.
• W3208280119 cites W4300750652 @default.
• W3208280119 doi "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12192" @default.
• W3208280119 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35070517" @default.

• next