Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3208601434> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 80 of
80
with 100 items per page.
- W3208601434 endingPage "S267" @default.
- W3208601434 startingPage "S267" @default.
- W3208601434 abstract "Introduction: Colonoscopy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in adult patients in The United States. Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening given the ability for direct visualization of the colonic mucosa. Adult colonoscopy is generally performed using either an adult colonoscope (AC) or a thinner diameter slim colonoscope (SC). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare these instruments when performing routine colonoscopy in adult patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases from inception to March 2021, which included Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, Ovid MEDLINE®, and In-Process and other non-indexed citations. The outcomes assessed were cecal intubation rate (CIR), terminal ileum intubation rate (TIIR), and insertion time (IT). Results: The results are summarized in table 1. Eight studies were included for final analysis. There were 2,819 total patients (1403 AC, 1416 SC). For CIR, the pooled results favored SC over AC (0.54). For TIIR, there was no difference (0.99). Similarly, for IT there was no difference (OR -0.14). Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, for adult colonoscopy the CIR was superior using SC as opposed to AC. There was no difference in TIIR or IT.Table 1.: Outcomes" @default.
- W3208601434 created "2021-11-08" @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5005551494 @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5006994577 @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5007657165 @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5016713032 @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5026934400 @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5036364640 @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5064175126 @default.
- W3208601434 creator A5086709717 @default.
- W3208601434 date "2021-10-01" @default.
- W3208601434 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W3208601434 title "S588 A Comparison of Using an Adult vs. Slim Colonoscope in Performing Routine Colonoscopy in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
- W3208601434 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000774824.55196.d4" @default.
- W3208601434 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3208601434 type Work @default.
- W3208601434 sameAs 3208601434 @default.
- W3208601434 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3208601434 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5005551494 @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5006994577 @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5007657165 @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5016713032 @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5026934400 @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5036364640 @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5064175126 @default.
- W3208601434 hasAuthorship W3208601434A5086709717 @default.
- W3208601434 hasBestOaLocation W32086014341 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C3019203764 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C121608353 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C126322002 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C141071460 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C17744445 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C189708586 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C199539241 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C2776478404 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C2778435480 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C2778716859 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C2779473830 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C3019203764 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C40993552 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C526805850 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C71924100 @default.
- W3208601434 hasConceptScore W3208601434C95190672 @default.
- W3208601434 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3208601434 hasLocation W32086014341 @default.
- W3208601434 hasLocation W32086014342 @default.
- W3208601434 hasOpenAccess W3208601434 @default.
- W3208601434 hasPrimaryLocation W32086014341 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W1864758564 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W2019959635 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W2070493202 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W2168556626 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W2946748423 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W2990419766 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W3023314329 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W4212804183 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W4292494721 @default.
- W3208601434 hasRelatedWork W4317877674 @default.
- W3208601434 hasVolume "116" @default.
- W3208601434 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3208601434 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3208601434 magId "3208601434" @default.
- W3208601434 workType "article" @default.