FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3208792167> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3208792167 endingPage "e556" @default.
• W3208792167 startingPage "e555" @default.
• W3208792167 abstract "Previous studies have characterized dose gradient patterns for various hypo-fractionated brain radiosurgery (hSRS) treatment platforms. The Gamma Knife Icon (GKI) has consistently exhibited either superior or non-inferior peripheral dose fall-off and normal brain sparing characteristics when compared to other Linac-based hSRS treatment platforms. Given the prevalence of Linac-based treatments, identifying planning techniques to optimize treatment parameters is desirable. In this study, we investigated a novel Linac-based treatment approach that aimed to create the sharpest dose fall-off for hSRS of large brain lesions.A cohort of patient cases (n = 10) with single brain lesions (volume 27.6+/-8.1 mL, range 20.-42.1 mL) treated with GKI at our institution were selected as sample test cases for our study. A non-coplanar unconstrained VMAT (NCU-VMAT) treatment planning approach was developed, and its script was implemented on a commercial treatment planning system for clinical Linac treatment equipped with the latest high-definition multi-leaf collimators (MLCs). Treatment plans produced via the NCU-VMAT approach were then compared against further optimized treatment plans from GKI, as well as conventional coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT treatment planning approaches. The comparison was carried out using DVH-derived parameters including target volume coverage, target dose conformity, modified dose fall-off index defined as the volume of 50% prescribed target dose divided by the target volume (PIV50).For each case studied, NCU-VMAT achieved practically identical target coverage (0.98 ± 0.01) and Paddick dose conformity index (0.87 ± 0.02) compared to optimized GKI treatments. The mean PIV50 values were 2.99 ± 0.14, 3.77 ± 0.22, and 3.36 ± 0.19 for optimized GKI, conventional coplanar, and non-coplanar VMAT treatment plans, respectively. These results were in excellent agreement with previously published studies. However, the NCU-VMAT technique yielded a mean PIV50 of 2.41 ± 0.07. This represents an improvement of approximately 40% (P < 0.001, paired two-tailed Student t-test) over all existing approaches including GKI. Further analyses revealed that PIV50 of NCU-VMAT approached the theoretical minimum for all the studied cases.Our results demonstrate that in treatment of large brain tumors, a treatment planning approach using Bremsstrahlung x-ray based Linacs can achieve superior dose fall-off for intracranial hSRS compared to GKI. We dispel the myth that physical characteristics of Cobalt γ-rays are needed to create the sharpest dose fall-off. Given the prevalence of Linac-based treatments compared to GKI, we present a novel optimized planning technique that achieves a new benchmark of sharpest dose fall-off.T. Nano: None. O. Morin: None. B.P. Ziemer: None. D. Raleigh: None. L. Boreta: None. J.L. Nakamura: None. S.E. Fogh: Independent Contractor; Accuray. P.K. Sneed: None. S. Hervey-Jumper: None. P.V. Theodosopoulos: None. S.E. Braunstein: Advisory Board; Radiation Oncology Questions, LLC.L. Ma: Patent/License Fees/Copyright; University of California Regents." @default.
• W3208792167 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5001882236 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5007540843 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5018329012 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5022900238 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5038354675 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5039465135 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5043536050 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5060552563 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5067097934 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5072259049 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5078235989 @default.
• W3208792167 creator A5089595870 @default.
• W3208792167 date "2021-11-01" @default.
• W3208792167 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3208792167 title "A New Benchmark of the Sharpest Dose Fall-Off for Hypo-Fractionated Radiosurgery of Large Single Target Brain Lesions" @default.
• W3208792167 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1506" @default.
• W3208792167 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34701739" @default.
• W3208792167 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3208792167 type Work @default.
• W3208792167 sameAs 3208792167 @default.
• W3208792167 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3208792167 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5001882236 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5007540843 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5018329012 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5022900238 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5038354675 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5039465135 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5043536050 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5060552563 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5067097934 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5072259049 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5078235989 @default.
• W3208792167 hasAuthorship W3208792167A5089595870 @default.
• W3208792167 hasBestOaLocation W32087921671 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C180048950 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C2994042627 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C120665830 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C121332964 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C126838900 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C168834538 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C180048950 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C201645570 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C2780387249 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C2989005 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C2994042627 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C509974204 @default.
• W3208792167 hasConceptScore W3208792167C71924100 @default.
• W3208792167 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3208792167 hasLocation W32087921671 @default.
• W3208792167 hasLocation W32087921672 @default.
• W3208792167 hasOpenAccess W3208792167 @default.
• W3208792167 hasPrimaryLocation W32087921671 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W1969405791 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2004112197 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2009552512 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2029474390 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2076006575 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2102963139 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2132730716 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2332502965 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W2382885693 @default.
• W3208792167 hasRelatedWork W3210245320 @default.
• W3208792167 hasVolume "111" @default.
• W3208792167 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3208792167 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3208792167 magId "3208792167" @default.
• W3208792167 workType "article" @default.