FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3208981930> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3208981930 endingPage "S54" @default.
• W3208981930 startingPage "S53" @default.
• W3208981930 abstract "Emergency physicians must be competent to perform numerous procedures. It is unclear if clinical practice alone is sufficient to maintain procedural skills, particularly for academic faculty who supervise trainees. Formal assessment of procedural skills beyond training is uncommon. There is a paucity of literature on faculty skills attrition or their preferences for skills maintenance. The faculty procedural skills (FPS) survey sought to determine faculty attitudes, beliefs and experience with procedures to inform programming aimed at skills maintenance. This was a multisite, cross-sectional study of emergency medicine (EM) and pediatric EM (PEM) physician faculty at five large US academic EM departments. Subjects were board certified or board eligible in EM or PEM and provided both clinical care and supervision of trainees. Subjects completed the FPS survey online which consisted of three sections: (1) respondent characteristics and experience performing and supervising EM procedures; (2) degree of confidence performing critical procedures; and (3) attitudes about skills attrition and learning preferences. Internal consistency of each survey section was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha. Items related to beliefs and attitudes were graded on a 5-point scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), with higher values representing greater agreement. Response agreement (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) was calculated by combining “strongly disagree” with “disagree” and “strongly agree” with “agree” responses. A total of 186 faculty completed the survey (44% response rate). Scale reliability was good (Cronbach’s alpha performance = 0.82; supervision = 0.86; confidence = 0.85). All respondents agreed that ongoing procedural skills training is important for the clinical practice of EM. The majority of respondents agreed: that faculty should have opportunities to retrain for uncommon procedures (98%, 95% CI: ±2%); that skills attrition is a concerning problem (91%, 95% CI: ± 4.1%); that skills attrition is a patient safety issue (89%, 95% CI: ± 4.5%); that attrition was more likely in academic settings (93%, 95% CI: ± 3.7%); that faculty should be required to demonstrate procedural competence (83%, 95% CI: ± 5.4%). The majority of respondents (73%, 95% CI: ± 6.4%) personally experienced procedural skill attrition and a similar number (68%, 95% CI: ± 6.7%) observed it in peers. The most preferred method for skills maintenance was simulation (83%, 95% CI: ± 5.4%). The most preferred learning environment was in groups with peers (89%, 95% CI: ± 4.5%). A majority of faculty reported skills attrition, both personally and observed in peers. Respondents also overwhelmingly agreed they should be competent to perform procedures for which they are credentialed. These findings raise questions about the need for technical skill competency assessments for continued clinical practice. Faculty preferred simulation-based learning and peer environments for skills maintenance. Further study is needed to determine the attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of non-academic emergency physicians with procedural skills attrition." @default.
• W3208981930 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5000104478 @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5006015624 @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5012646792 @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5030181384 @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5033110963 @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5044129198 @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5055087181 @default.
• W3208981930 creator A5069673896 @default.
• W3208981930 date "2021-10-01" @default.
• W3208981930 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3208981930 title "132 Faculty Procedural Skills in Academic Emergency Medicine: A Multisite Survey" @default.
• W3208981930 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.142" @default.
• W3208981930 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3208981930 type Work @default.
• W3208981930 sameAs 3208981930 @default.
• W3208981930 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3208981930 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5000104478 @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5006015624 @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5012646792 @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5030181384 @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5033110963 @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5044129198 @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5055087181 @default.
• W3208981930 hasAuthorship W3208981930A5069673896 @default.
• W3208981930 hasBestOaLocation W32089819301 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C2778954079 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C2780553607 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C2994511739 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C106906290 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C121332964 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C159110408 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C171606756 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C17744445 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C199343813 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C199539241 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C2776640315 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C2778755073 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C2778954079 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C2780553607 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C2780724011 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C2994511739 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C509550671 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C512399662 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C61521584 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C62520636 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C70410870 @default.
• W3208981930 hasConceptScore W3208981930C71924100 @default.
• W3208981930 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3208981930 hasLocation W32089819301 @default.
• W3208981930 hasOpenAccess W3208981930 @default.
• W3208981930 hasPrimaryLocation W32089819301 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W1984716775 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W2046508803 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W2310794745 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W2938322700 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W3046765498 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W314490021 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W3186252627 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W4206385536 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W4226120380 @default.
• W3208981930 hasRelatedWork W6006308 @default.
• W3208981930 hasVolume "78" @default.
• W3208981930 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3208981930 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3208981930 magId "3208981930" @default.
• W3208981930 workType "article" @default.