FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3209183088> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3209183088 endingPage "613" @default.
• W3209183088 startingPage "602" @default.
• W3209183088 abstract "BACKGROUND. Traditional approaches for evaluating multiple myeloma (MM) treatment response have low sensitivity for residual disease. Recent studies highlight the utility of whole-body MRI or FDG PET/CT in evaluating treatment response, with increasing emphasis on DWI. OBJECTIVE. This systematic review was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT for MM treatment response assessment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. Studies in which whole-body MRI or FDG PET/CT was used to evaluate MM treatment response were identified through search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases through June 30, 2021. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting response were calculated by bivariate modeling. The diagnostic performances of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT were compared. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess studies comparing the modalities and studies in which whole-body MRI included DWI. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Twelve studies comprising 373 patients were included: six evaluated both modalities, four evaluated whole-body MRI only, and two evaluated FDG PET/CT only. Of studies of MRI, five included DWI. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI, 75-93%) and 57% (95% CI, 37-76%) for whole-body MRI versus 64% (95% CI, 45-79%) and 82% (95% CI, 75-88%) for FDG PET/CT (sensitivity, p = .29; specificity, p = .01). For studies directly comparing the modalities, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90% (95% CI, 80-100%) and 56% (95% CI, 44-68%) for whole-body MRI versus 66% (95% CI, 47-85%) and 81% (95% CI, 72-90%) for FDG PET/CT (sensitivity, p = .18; specificity, p < .001). Sensitivity and specificity were 93% (95% CI, 75-98%) and 57% (95% CI, 21-87%) for DWI versus 74% (95% CI, 60-85%) and 56% (95% CI, 38-73%) for whole-body MRI without DWI (sensitivity, p = .27; specificity, p = .99). The AUC values were 0.84 for whole-body MRI, 0.83 for FDG PET/CT, and 0.92 for DWI. CONCLUSION. FDG PET/CT had significantly higher specificity, and whole-body MRI had higher sensitivity (though nonsignificant). DWI may contribute to the high sensitivity of whole-body MRI. CLINICAL IMPACT. The results of this meta-analysis suggest potential complementary roles of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/CT in assessment of MM treatment response. Future studies should explore their combination through PET/MRI." @default.
• W3209183088 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3209183088 creator A5007506402 @default.
• W3209183088 creator A5030527374 @default.
• W3209183088 creator A5031548653 @default.
• W3209183088 creator A5046133970 @default.
• W3209183088 creator A5070044404 @default.
• W3209183088 creator A5091504222 @default.
• W3209183088 date "2022-04-01" @default.
• W3209183088 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3209183088 title "Comparative Performance of Whole-Body MRI and FDG PET/CT in Evaluation of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Response: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W3209183088 cites W1978377409 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2003825586 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2012932483 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2020488794 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2030093327 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2046637257 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2071676969 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2090310344 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2128084036 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2130727020 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2138152245 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2139789239 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2141014263 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2147493587 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2158152463 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2415257442 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2486629951 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2567188480 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2727891259 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2729221450 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2785704959 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2792853641 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2801361628 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2916571767 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W2947708728 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W3009202602 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W3013063217 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W3112088296 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W3121354053 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W3126698502 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W3153566306 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W4211037848 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W4252175385 @default.
• W3209183088 cites W9631202 @default.
• W3209183088 doi "https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.21.26381" @default.
• W3209183088 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34704461" @default.
• W3209183088 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3209183088 type Work @default.
• W3209183088 sameAs 3209183088 @default.
• W3209183088 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W3209183088 countsByYear W32091830882022 @default.
• W3209183088 countsByYear W32091830882023 @default.
• W3209183088 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3209183088 hasAuthorship W3209183088A5007506402 @default.
• W3209183088 hasAuthorship W3209183088A5030527374 @default.
• W3209183088 hasAuthorship W3209183088A5031548653 @default.
• W3209183088 hasAuthorship W3209183088A5046133970 @default.
• W3209183088 hasAuthorship W3209183088A5070044404 @default.
• W3209183088 hasAuthorship W3209183088A5091504222 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C127077266 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C2775842073 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C2776410896 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C126322002 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C126838900 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C127077266 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C2775842073 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C2776410896 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C2989005 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C71924100 @default.
• W3209183088 hasConceptScore W3209183088C95190672 @default.
• W3209183088 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3209183088 hasLocation W32091830881 @default.
• W3209183088 hasLocation W32091830882 @default.
• W3209183088 hasOpenAccess W3209183088 @default.
• W3209183088 hasPrimaryLocation W32091830881 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2056230210 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2081447305 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2313407248 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2320066283 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2602270552 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2780085797 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2899016263 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2951337402 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W2966628310 @default.
• W3209183088 hasRelatedWork W3129607688 @default.
• W3209183088 hasVolume "218" @default.
• W3209183088 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3209183088 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3209183088 magId "3209183088" @default.
• W3209183088 workType "article" @default.