FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3209296761> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3209296761 endingPage "139" @default.
• W3209296761 startingPage "123" @default.
• W3209296761 abstract "In this study, we investigated the variation in the microbial community present in bulk tank milk samples and the potential effect of different farm management factors. Bulk tank milk samples were collected repeatedly over one year from 42 farms located in northern Sweden. Total and thermoresistant bacteria counts and 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing were used to characterize microbial community composition. The microbial community was in general heterogeneous both within and between different farms and the community composition in the bulk tank milk was commonly dominated by Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Streptococcus, unclassified Peptostreptococcaceae, and Staphylococcus. Principal component analysis including farm factor variables and microbial taxa data revealed that the microbial community in milk was affected by type of milking system. Milk from farms using an automatic (robot) milking system (AMS) and loose housing showed different microbial community composition compared with milk from tiestall farms. A discriminant analysis model revealed that this difference was dependent on several microbial taxa. Among farms using an automatic milking system, there were further differences in the microbial community composition depending on the brand of the milking robot used. On tiestall farms, routines for teat preparation and cleaning of the milking equipment affected the microbial community composition in milk. Total bacteria count (TBC) in milk differed between the farm types, and TBC were higher on AMS than tiestall farms (log 4.05 vs. log 3.79 TBC/mL for AMS and tiestalls, respectively). Among tiestall farms, milk from farms using a chemical agent in connection to teat preparation and a more frequent use of acid to clean the milking equipment had lower TBC in milk, than milk from farms using water for teat preparation and a less frequent use of acid to clean the milking equipment (log 3.68 vs. 4.02 TBC/mL). There were no significant differences in the number of thermoresistant bacteria between farm types. The evaluated factors explained only a small proportion of total variation in the microbiota data, however, despite this, the study highlights the effect of routines associated with teat preparation and cleaning of the milking equipment on raw milk microbiota, irrespective of type of milking system used." @default.
• W3209296761 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5004403085 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5006855744 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5009100096 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5049397927 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5052685590 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5070023853 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5074617747 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5077728621 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5081061723 @default.
• W3209296761 creator A5091073882 @default.
• W3209296761 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W3209296761 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3209296761 title "Milking system and premilking routines have a strong effect on the microbial community in bulk tank milk" @default.
• W3209296761 cites W1887050506 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2000074266 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2010933978 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2017113234 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2031611770 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2036897871 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2046586444 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2060293044 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2083468707 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2104638531 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2127774996 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2169798979 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2178731872 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2401404581 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2467415213 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2592244930 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2774486220 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2807194798 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2910446657 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2944787069 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2951951558 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2953820844 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2958463378 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W2963276645 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W3034952447 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W3041399721 @default.
• W3209296761 cites W3157957560 @default.
• W3209296761 doi "https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20661" @default.
• W3209296761 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696914" @default.
• W3209296761 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3209296761 type Work @default.
• W3209296761 sameAs 3209296761 @default.
• W3209296761 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3209296761 countsByYear W32092967612022 @default.
• W3209296761 countsByYear W32092967612023 @default.
• W3209296761 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5004403085 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5006855744 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5009100096 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5049397927 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5052685590 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5070023853 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5074617747 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5077728621 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5081061723 @default.
• W3209296761 hasAuthorship W3209296761A5091073882 @default.
• W3209296761 hasBestOaLocation W32092967611 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C194775826 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C22641795 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C2776659692 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C2779885849 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C2780042802 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C2780548643 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C2993206177 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C40231798 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C42062724 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C81407943 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C138885662 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C140793950 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C194775826 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C22641795 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C2776659692 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C2779234561 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C2779885849 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C2780042802 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C2780548643 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C2993206177 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C31903555 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C40231798 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C41895202 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C42062724 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C523546767 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C54355233 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C81407943 @default.
• W3209296761 hasConceptScore W3209296761C86803240 @default.

• next