FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3209689088> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3209689088 abstract "The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate the current situation of the implementation of the information technology risk management comparing with the general risk management frameworks and principles. The objective of this study is to obtain the key success factors from the general risk management frameworks and principles, and case studies’ practice. Then, matching between the key success factors from two sources through the developed framework applying from task technology fit theory in terms of process structuring. This study is based on qualitative research by case study analysis. The developed conceptual framework is the principles and practice fit framework. The key success factors obtained from reviewing the general risk management frameworks and principles are understanding the organization’s context, three line of defense structure, team s expertise, training and culture, IT risk management process, and communication. The case study protocol is designed for case selection and data collection. The data are seven purposively selected case studies which are the mixed-size financial institutions in Thailand. Case profiles are narrated to show different aspects of chosen cases such as percentage of total asset comparing the market shares, technological-platform services, company status, three lines of defense structure, interviewee’s position and profile. The interview content of ITRM practice is collected by semi-structured interview. The reliability of this research is the triangulation of the general risk management frameworks and principles, the interviewees and the revision of ITRM experts. The content analysis method describes coding and content counting methods. The case study analysis result explains the real ITRM practice of the case studies which have the same and different practice the through the key success factors. The key success factors are ranked from the most counted content. The findings found that the most effective factors are Tools, Interdependence, and Expertise of the three lines of defense. The heart of the ITRM in the current situation is the interdependence of the three lines of defense structure. The problem now is the difficulty to find people in the three lines of defense especially the first and second lines of defense that have expertise in product and service lines and truly understand how to identify, to assess and to treat risks. Even though the solution is to find and to implement the efficient tools such as governance, risk management and compliance (GRC) tools, current tools have some problems which do not fit to the ITRM task. Other solutions suggested by the case studies are the ITRM process should be the end-to-end process, the authorized managements participate in risk identification process, the second line of defense mentors the first line of defense in risk assessment, historical and current data and information are useful to identify possible risks and to assess possible loss which impact to the organization, and organizing training or workshop help to communicate, to share knowledge and to increase expertise of people in the three lines of defense leading to the successful ITRM practice. The principles and practice fit framework is the theoretical contribution from this research. Even though the fit in terms of process structuring have been mentioned, there is no research study analyzing and synthesizing as this research does by the case study analysis. The proposed framework presents the other aspect of the task technology fit theory focusing on process structuring. Meanwhile, the technology is a part of process structuring. The factors that make the framework fit are our interest. The performance is not the emphasis in this research study but sharing stories from the case studies can also be a guide to achieve successful practical implementation. Therefore, the future research should include designs to test the performance of the ITRM process in the organization." @default.
• W3209689088 created "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3209689088 creator A5003888869 @default.
• W3209689088 creator A5060376535 @default.
• W3209689088 creator A5072561670 @default.
• W3209689088 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W3209689088 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3209689088 title "Principles and practice fit in information technology risk management (ITRM): multi-case study research" @default.
• W3209689088 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3209689088 type Work @default.
• W3209689088 sameAs 3209689088 @default.
• W3209689088 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3209689088 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3209689088 hasAuthorship W3209689088A5003888869 @default.
• W3209689088 hasAuthorship W3209689088A5060376535 @default.
• W3209689088 hasAuthorship W3209689088A5072561670 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C14224292 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C162446236 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C2775945657 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C32896092 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C10138342 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C127413603 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C14224292 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C144024400 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C144133560 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C151730666 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C162446236 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C195094911 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C2775945657 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C2779343474 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C32896092 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C36289849 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C41008148 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C539667460 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C56739046 @default.
• W3209689088 hasConceptScore W3209689088C86803240 @default.
• W3209689088 hasLocation W32096890881 @default.
• W3209689088 hasOpenAccess W3209689088 @default.
• W3209689088 hasPrimaryLocation W32096890881 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W1491489703 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W1503842563 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W1568152598 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W1753336912 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2111831991 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2163269622 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2183830637 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W226881708 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2300296872 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2398781888 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2579507933 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2596859763 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2743483157 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2888835412 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2889819796 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2963132552 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W3027843039 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W3156439812 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W594840042 @default.
• W3209689088 hasRelatedWork W2461719417 @default.
• W3209689088 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3209689088 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3209689088 magId "3209689088" @default.
• W3209689088 workType "article" @default.