FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3211383805> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3211383805 abstract "New methods of dietary assessment are increasingly making use of online technologies. The development of a new online food frequency questionnaire warranted investigation of its feasibility and the reproducibility of its results.To investigate the feasibility and reproducibility of a newly developed online FFQ (WebFFQ).The semiquantitative WebFFQ was designed to assess the habitual diet the previous year, with questions about frequency of intake and portion sizes. Estimations of portion sizes include both pictures and household measures, depending on the type of food in question. In two independent cross-sectional studies conducted in 2015 and 2016, adults were recruited by post following random selection from the general population. In the first study, participants (n = 229) filled in the WebFFQ and answered questions about its feasibility, and in two subsequent focus group meetings, participants (n = 9) discussed and gave feedback about the feasibility of the WebFFQ. In the second study, the WebFFQ's reproducibility was assessed by asking participants (n = 164) to fill it in on two separate occasions, 12 weeks apart. Moreover, in the second study, participants were offered personal dietary feedback, a monetary gift certificate, or both, as incentives to complete the study.In the feasibility study, evaluation form results showed that participants raised issues regarding the estimation of portion size and the intake of seasonal foods as being particularly challenging; furthermore, in the focus group discussions, personal feedback on diet was perceived to be a more motivating factor than monetary reward. In the reproducibility study, total food intake was lower in the second WebFFQ; however, 63% of the food groups were not significantly different from those in the first WebFFQ. Correlations of food intake ranged from 0.62 to 0.90, >86% of the participants were classified into the same or adjacent quartiles, and misclassification ranged from 0 to 3%. Average energy intake was 3.5% lower (p = 0.001), fiber showed the least difference at 1.6% (p = 0.007), and sugar intake differed the most at -6.8% (borderline significant, p = 0.08). Percentage energy obtained from macronutrients did not differ significantly between the first and second WebFFQs.Our results suggest that at group level, the WebFFQ showed good reproducibility for the estimations of intake of food groups, energy, and nutrients. The feasibility of the WebFFQ is good; however, revisions to further improve portion size estimations should be included in future versions. The WebFFQ is considered suitable for dietary assessments for healthy adults in the Norwegian population." @default.
• W3211383805 created "2021-11-22" @default.
• W3211383805 creator A5018348220 @default.
• W3211383805 creator A5053613116 @default.
• W3211383805 creator A5061273104 @default.
• W3211383805 date "2021-11-10" @default.
• W3211383805 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3211383805 title "Reproducibility and feasibility of an online self-administered food frequency questionnaire for use among adult Norwegians" @default.
• W3211383805 cites W1514654546 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W1566155680 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W1643288440 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W1970270355 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W1993322996 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2002511572 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2024433326 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2032829090 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W203985546 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2043684639 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2047655072 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2062395311 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2088060170 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2099461527 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2102314024 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2104296550 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2104814723 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2116247155 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2116613405 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2126419860 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2167636283 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2491234878 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2602229726 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2727052369 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2737158739 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2774080091 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2788254805 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2796385874 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2916365468 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2956267049 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W2996529497 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W4210696814 @default.
• W3211383805 cites W4255103055 @default.
• W3211383805 doi "https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v65.7561" @default.
• W3211383805 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34908922" @default.
• W3211383805 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3211383805 type Work @default.
• W3211383805 sameAs 3211383805 @default.
• W3211383805 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3211383805 countsByYear W32113838052022 @default.
• W3211383805 countsByYear W32113838052023 @default.
• W3211383805 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3211383805 hasAuthorship W3211383805A5018348220 @default.
• W3211383805 hasAuthorship W3211383805A5053613116 @default.
• W3211383805 hasAuthorship W3211383805A5061273104 @default.
• W3211383805 hasBestOaLocation W32113838051 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C176656743 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C2780662849 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C3020395413 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C63428231 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C65067816 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C105795698 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C138885662 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C144133560 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C15744967 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C162853370 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C176656743 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C2780662849 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C2908647359 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C3020395413 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C31903555 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C33923547 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C41895202 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C56995899 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C63428231 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C65067816 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C71924100 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C75630572 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C86803240 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C9893847 @default.
• W3211383805 hasConceptScore W3211383805C99454951 @default.
• W3211383805 hasLocation W32113838051 @default.
• W3211383805 hasLocation W32113838052 @default.
• W3211383805 hasLocation W32113838053 @default.
• W3211383805 hasLocation W32113838054 @default.
• W3211383805 hasOpenAccess W3211383805 @default.
• W3211383805 hasPrimaryLocation W32113838051 @default.

• next