FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3211946170> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3211946170 endingPage "106167" @default.
• W3211946170 startingPage "106167" @default.
• W3211946170 abstract "Introduction Colorectal anastomotic leaks (AL) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of AL and its intra-operative decision making is often difficult. The aim of this multi-centre study is to explore different management strategies, including different surgical options, and analyse rates and patterns of failure of initial management. Methods All consecutive patients who had a confirmed AL after elective colorectal resections from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2019 were included at seven hospitals across the East of England Region. Morbidity (length of stay, and failures) and mortality were compared across the different management strategies, and survival analyses were performed (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05000580). Results Across all seven hospitals, a total of 3391 elective resection were done during the study period. 201 (5.9%) consecutive patients with confirmed AL were included. The initial treatment was conservative in 102(50.7%). 19 patients (9.5%) had a radiological procedure, 80 (39.8%) of patients required surgery as an initial treatment post AL. Of those who initially did not have a surgical intervention (n = 121), 10% (n = 12/121) eventually required laparotomy, 2 additional patients required transanal drainage. Ultimately 45.8% (n = 92/201) of the whole population eventually required a laparotomy. Patients managed conservatively had a shorter LOS when compared to either radiological drainage or surgical patients. Patients with a defunctioning stoma are more likely to have a successful conservative management and shorter LOS. 90-day mortality across the entire population was 8.1%. There were no significant differences in mortality or long-terms survival between the different initial treatment modalities or whether the leak was right or left sided. Conclusion Despite initial conservative, antibiotic and radiological intervention being successful in the majority of patients, two out of five patients will still require a laparotomy and over a quarter of patients will have an end stoma. Highlights The study has highlighted the hazards of anastomotic leaks and the various potential options available for their management. Initial management is initially guided by the patient’s haemodynamic status. Surgical options include anastomosis-sparing with diversion and, anastomosis-sacrificing procedures. In rectal leaks, the presence of a defunctioning stoma improves the likelihood of success of conservative management. Selecting the appropriate initial management for the appropriate patient is key. Over a quarter of patients who experiences an AL will ultimately have a stoma." @default.
• W3211946170 created "2021-11-22" @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5005052038 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5005785988 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5014691336 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5028916338 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5030907810 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5041570474 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5041825094 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5042275658 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5047984947 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5051480786 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5053257711 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5060833092 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5061535689 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5063070243 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5065166998 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5078109796 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5081771562 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5085352403 @default.
• W3211946170 creator A5088528341 @default.
• W3211946170 date "2021-12-01" @default.
• W3211946170 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3211946170 title "Management of anastomotic leaks after elective colorectal resections: The East of England experience. A retrospective cohort" @default.
• W3211946170 cites W1983198572 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2011255125 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2031424138 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2071983048 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2086608161 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2087335038 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2788192244 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2896379731 @default.
• W3211946170 cites W2989427582 @default.
• W3211946170 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106167" @default.
• W3211946170 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34752951" @default.
• W3211946170 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3211946170 type Work @default.
• W3211946170 sameAs 3211946170 @default.
• W3211946170 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3211946170 countsByYear W32119461702022 @default.
• W3211946170 countsByYear W32119461702023 @default.
• W3211946170 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5005052038 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5005785988 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5014691336 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5028916338 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5030907810 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5041570474 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5041825094 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5042275658 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5047984947 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5051480786 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5053257711 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5060833092 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5061535689 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5063070243 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5065166998 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5078109796 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5081771562 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5085352403 @default.
• W3211946170 hasAuthorship W3211946170A5088528341 @default.
• W3211946170 hasBestOaLocation W32119461701 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C179755657 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C190892606 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C2780637204 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C2780904754 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C2781312054 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C126322002 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C141071460 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C167135981 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C179755657 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C190892606 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C2780637204 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C2780778865 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C2780904754 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C2781312054 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C2908647359 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C61434518 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C71924100 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C72563966 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C8443397 @default.
• W3211946170 hasConceptScore W3211946170C99454951 @default.
• W3211946170 hasLocation W32119461701 @default.
• W3211946170 hasLocation W32119461702 @default.
• W3211946170 hasOpenAccess W3211946170 @default.
• W3211946170 hasPrimaryLocation W32119461701 @default.
• W3211946170 hasRelatedWork W1573888919 @default.
• W3211946170 hasRelatedWork W176964948 @default.

• next