Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3212477817> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3212477817 endingPage "1463" @default.
- W3212477817 startingPage "1428" @default.
- W3212477817 abstract "The objective of this systematic review was to identify, evaluate and synthesize evidence of the effectiveness of vibratory stimulation to reduce needle-related procedural pain in children aged 18 years and younger.Needle-related procedures (NRPs) are common medical procedures associated with pain. Children, in particular, experience unpredictable and severe pain in response to NRPs. The gate control theory is commonly used to countermeasure this pain. Based on this theory, various types of vibratory stimulation have been used to reduce pain in several clinical studies.Participants were 0- to 18-year-old children who underwent NRPs for any condition. The intervention included any type of vibratory stimulation during the NRPs. The main outcome was pain measured on any pain scale, including both self-rated and observer-rated pain scales. The secondary outcomes were anxiety, the duration of the procedure and the success rate. All studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomized trials published in English.The search strategy aimed to identify both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. An initial search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken, followed by a search for unpublished studies. Nine databases were used for the search in October 2017. Papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Any disagreements that arose between the reviewers were resolved through discussion. Quantitative data were extracted from papers included in the review using a standardized data extraction tool. Where possible, quantitative data were pooled in the statistical meta-analysis. All results were subject to double data entry. Effect sizes were expressed as risk ratios (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data), and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for analysis.Twenty-one RCTs involving 1727 children were identified. Blinding of the participants and those delivering the treatment was not achieved in all studies, introducing a potential risk of bias. Overall, the vibratory stimulation was significantly effective in reducing NRP pain in children as shown by measurement of self-rated pain outcomes (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.92 to -0.18) and observer-rated pain outcomes (SMD: -0.47, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.18). Among secondary outcomes, the effect on the child's anxiety (SMD: -1.03, 95% CI: -1.85 to -0.20) was significant.Vibratory stimulation was effective in reducing NRP pain in children; however, blinding was not possible in the trials. Moreover, heterogeneity was high. Therefore, the confidence in the evidence is low. Personal preference should be a priority when using vibratory stimulation in the clinical setting." @default.
- W3212477817 created "2021-11-22" @default.
- W3212477817 creator A5019020449 @default.
- W3212477817 creator A5053566691 @default.
- W3212477817 creator A5079900695 @default.
- W3212477817 date "2019-04-23" @default.
- W3212477817 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3212477817 title "Effectiveness of vibratory stimulation on needle-related procedural pain in children: a systematic review" @default.
- W3212477817 cites W1550531151 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W1734029695 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W1920820352 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W1927066725 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W1995597820 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W1997875580 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W1998587571 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2012103940 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2014779151 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2023895533 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2024449456 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2031240347 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2033792514 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2037026737 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2040307295 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2045555521 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2065099047 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2065267852 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2065808627 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2069473941 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2075453224 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2075715972 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2081155271 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2092793776 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2098330470 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2102155358 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2103114237 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2104265022 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2115718271 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2123791228 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2126786431 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2134528972 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2143397271 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2148784203 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2156759425 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2157823046 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2165442783 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2176821752 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2191491938 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2325250512 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2346816944 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2400161753 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2407917639 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2518380459 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2581685773 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2645254367 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W2940302492 @default.
- W3212477817 cites W4294215472 @default.
- W3212477817 doi "https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003890" @default.
- W3212477817 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31021972" @default.
- W3212477817 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W3212477817 type Work @default.
- W3212477817 sameAs 3212477817 @default.
- W3212477817 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W3212477817 countsByYear W32124778172020 @default.
- W3212477817 countsByYear W32124778172021 @default.
- W3212477817 countsByYear W32124778172022 @default.
- W3212477817 countsByYear W32124778172023 @default.
- W3212477817 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3212477817 hasAuthorship W3212477817A5019020449 @default.
- W3212477817 hasAuthorship W3212477817A5053566691 @default.
- W3212477817 hasAuthorship W3212477817A5079900695 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C2771230 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C2777466982 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C118552586 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C141071460 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C142724271 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C152541439 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C168563851 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C17744445 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C1862650 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C199539241 @default.
- W3212477817 hasConceptScore W3212477817C204787440 @default.