Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3212796140> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3212796140 endingPage "547.e14" @default.
- W3212796140 startingPage "547.e1" @default.
- W3212796140 abstract "Social media is increasingly becoming a health resource for people suffering from complex and debilitating health conditions. A comprehensive understanding of how and why social media and the Internet are used among patients with chronic gynecologic pain will allow for the intentional development and incorporation of web-based tools into patient care plans.This study aimed to determine whether gynecologic patients with pain are more likely to use social media and the Internet to understand and manage their condition than those without pain. The survey was designed to explore how gynecologic patients with and without pain use and interact with social media and other web-based health resources and the clinical, personal, and demographic factors influencing these behaviors.Patients presenting with a new complaint to a gynecologist at 1 of 6 Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery-affiliated hospital systems were screened, consented, and assigned to pain and no-pain groups. Participants were surveyed about social media and Internet use, symptoms, bother, physician selection, motivation, trust, and demographic information. Survey responses were compared using the Fisher exact tests, odds ratios, and risk ratios from standard tabular analysis, univariate or multivariate tests of means, and regression analyses, as appropriate.Of 517 participants included in the study, 475 (92%) completed the survey, 328 (69.1%) with pain and 147 (30.9%) without pain. Study participants in the pain group reported more than double the odds of using social media than those without pain (37.8% vs 19.7%; odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-3.96) and triple the odds of using the Internet (88.4% vs 69.4%; odds ratio, 3.37; 95% confidence, 2.04-5.56) to understand or manage their condition. Participants with pain were more likely than those without pain to engage in social media at a higher level (3.5 vs 1.7 on a scale of 0 to 10; P<.0001), be motivated by interpersonal elements of online engagement (Hotelling's T2=37.3; P<.0001), prefer an interactive component to their online health resource (35.6% vs 24.3%; risk ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.20; P=.0433), be influenced by others in their choice of a gynecologist (0.37 vs 0.32 on a scale of 0 to 1; P=.009), use social media as a coping tool (38.3% vs 17%; P=.0001), trust information found on social media (31.4% vs 16.7%; P=.0033), and trust other women with the same condition, informal health resources, and personal sources more and doctors and formal health resources less (P=.0083). Participants in both groups reported higher levels of social media engagement with higher levels of symptom bother (28% increase in engagement with every doubling of bother level (P<.0001).Patients with gynecologic pain were more likely than those without pain to use social media and the Internet to understand and manage their condition. Patients with pain engaged in and trusted social media at a higher level, with engagement rising directly with bother level." @default.
- W3212796140 created "2021-11-22" @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5004793126 @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5005261482 @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5038949837 @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5050655794 @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5064402174 @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5088497772 @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5089534368 @default.
- W3212796140 creator A5089556251 @default.
- W3212796140 date "2022-04-01" @default.
- W3212796140 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W3212796140 title "Social media utilization, preferences, and patterns of behavior in patients with gynecologic pelvic pain" @default.
- W3212796140 cites W1768656170 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W1967871556 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W1985122959 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W1992607204 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2000660784 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2016258952 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2022188970 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2025341678 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2057579378 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2058399165 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2059999671 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2126049444 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2128131170 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2138041622 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2141085468 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2163525565 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2338731919 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2402726895 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2412333800 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2442851786 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W2586182593 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W3003513492 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W3009149406 @default.
- W3212796140 cites W4230065791 @default.
- W3212796140 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.039" @default.
- W3212796140 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34752735" @default.
- W3212796140 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W3212796140 type Work @default.
- W3212796140 sameAs 3212796140 @default.
- W3212796140 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W3212796140 countsByYear W32127961402022 @default.
- W3212796140 countsByYear W32127961402023 @default.
- W3212796140 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5004793126 @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5005261482 @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5038949837 @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5050655794 @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5064402174 @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5088497772 @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5089534368 @default.
- W3212796140 hasAuthorship W3212796140A5089556251 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C2780136519 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C126322002 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C141071460 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C143095724 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C151956035 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C156957248 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C160735492 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C162324750 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C17744445 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C1862650 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C199539241 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C2780136519 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C44249647 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C50522688 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C512399662 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C518677369 @default.
- W3212796140 hasConceptScore W3212796140C71924100 @default.
- W3212796140 hasFunder F4320318410 @default.
- W3212796140 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W3212796140 hasLocation W32127961401 @default.
- W3212796140 hasLocation W32127961402 @default.
- W3212796140 hasOpenAccess W3212796140 @default.
- W3212796140 hasPrimaryLocation W32127961401 @default.
- W3212796140 hasRelatedWork W2006376692 @default.
- W3212796140 hasRelatedWork W2011313051 @default.
- W3212796140 hasRelatedWork W2037611947 @default.
- W3212796140 hasRelatedWork W2106414694 @default.
- W3212796140 hasRelatedWork W2156190299 @default.
- W3212796140 hasRelatedWork W2321652772 @default.