FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3213065997> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3213065997 endingPage "e1706" @default.
• W3213065997 startingPage "e1697" @default.
• W3213065997 abstract "BackgroundReaching zero-dose children (infants who receive no routine vaccinations) is a global strategic priority. We studied zero-dose children in India over 24 years to clarify aggregate trends and the contribution of large-scale social, economic, and geographical inequalities to these.MethodsWe did a multilevel, geospatial analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys of all four rounds (1992–2016) of India's National Family Health Survey to study the prevalence, distribution, and drivers of zero-dose (no first dose of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccination status. We included all children born to participating women who were aged 12–23 months at the time of the survey, as this is the standard age at which immunisation data are assessed. Children who died before the survey and those missing data on key outcomes or correlates were excluded. The outcome was child zero-dose vaccination status. We also compared the prevalence of nutritional deficits among zero-dose versus vaccinated children. For the most recent survey, we produced geospatial estimates identifying the prevalence of zero-dose children across states and districts and used these to project head count.FindingsWe examined 393 167 children for eligibility. 72 848 children were included in the final analytic data set. The proportion of zero-dose children in India declined from 33·4% (95% CI 32·5–34·2) in 1992 to 10·1% (9·8–10·4) in 2016. Progress notwithstanding, in 2016, zero-dose children remained concentrated among disadvantaged groups (prevalence in the bottom wealth quintile 15·3%, 95% CI 14·6–16·0; prevalence among mothers with no education 16·8%, 16·1–17·4). Compared with vaccinated children, zero-dose children were more likely to suffer from malnutrition in all survey rounds (prevalence of severe stunting in 1992: zero dose 41·3%, 95% CI 39·2–43·8 vs vaccinated 28·5%, 27·2–29·7; 2016: zero dose 24·9%, 23·6–26·2 vs vaccinated 18·7%, 18·3–19·1). In 2016, there were an estimated 2·88 (95% CI 2·86–2·89) million zero-dose children in India, concentrated in less developed states and districts and several urban areas.InterpretationOver a 24-year period in India, child zero-dose status was shaped by large-scale social inequalities and remained a consistent marker of generalised vulnerability. Interventions that address this cycle of intergenerational inequities should be prioritised.FundingNone.TranslationsFor the French, Spanish, and Hindi translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. Reaching zero-dose children (infants who receive no routine vaccinations) is a global strategic priority. We studied zero-dose children in India over 24 years to clarify aggregate trends and the contribution of large-scale social, economic, and geographical inequalities to these. We did a multilevel, geospatial analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys of all four rounds (1992–2016) of India's National Family Health Survey to study the prevalence, distribution, and drivers of zero-dose (no first dose of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccination status. We included all children born to participating women who were aged 12–23 months at the time of the survey, as this is the standard age at which immunisation data are assessed. Children who died before the survey and those missing data on key outcomes or correlates were excluded. The outcome was child zero-dose vaccination status. We also compared the prevalence of nutritional deficits among zero-dose versus vaccinated children. For the most recent survey, we produced geospatial estimates identifying the prevalence of zero-dose children across states and districts and used these to project head count. We examined 393 167 children for eligibility. 72 848 children were included in the final analytic data set. The proportion of zero-dose children in India declined from 33·4% (95% CI 32·5–34·2) in 1992 to 10·1% (9·8–10·4) in 2016. Progress notwithstanding, in 2016, zero-dose children remained concentrated among disadvantaged groups (prevalence in the bottom wealth quintile 15·3%, 95% CI 14·6–16·0; prevalence among mothers with no education 16·8%, 16·1–17·4). Compared with vaccinated children, zero-dose children were more likely to suffer from malnutrition in all survey rounds (prevalence of severe stunting in 1992: zero dose 41·3%, 95% CI 39·2–43·8 vs vaccinated 28·5%, 27·2–29·7; 2016: zero dose 24·9%, 23·6–26·2 vs vaccinated 18·7%, 18·3–19·1). In 2016, there were an estimated 2·88 (95% CI 2·86–2·89) million zero-dose children in India, concentrated in less developed states and districts and several urban areas. Over a 24-year period in India, child zero-dose status was shaped by large-scale social inequalities and remained a consistent marker of generalised vulnerability. Interventions that address this cycle of intergenerational inequities should be prioritised." @default.
• W3213065997 created "2021-11-22" @default.
• W3213065997 creator A5013504257 @default.
• W3213065997 creator A5059239803 @default.
• W3213065997 creator A5083923676 @default.
• W3213065997 date "2021-12-01" @default.
• W3213065997 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W3213065997 title "Progress in reaching unvaccinated (zero-dose) children in India, 1992–2016: a multilevel, geospatial analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys" @default.
• W3213065997 cites W1492341534 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W1965905958 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W1996435081 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W2104625244 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W2591841133 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W2806827079 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W3006754301 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W3092565601 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W3108098877 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W3123481858 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W3128968920 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W3137868160 @default.
• W3213065997 cites W3181093306 @default.
• W3213065997 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00349-1" @default.
• W3213065997 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34798029" @default.
• W3213065997 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3213065997 type Work @default.
• W3213065997 sameAs 3213065997 @default.
• W3213065997 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W3213065997 countsByYear W32130659972021 @default.
• W3213065997 countsByYear W32130659972022 @default.
• W3213065997 countsByYear W32130659972023 @default.
• W3213065997 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3213065997 hasAuthorship W3213065997A5013504257 @default.
• W3213065997 hasAuthorship W3213065997A5059239803 @default.
• W3213065997 hasAuthorship W3213065997A5083923676 @default.
• W3213065997 hasBestOaLocation W32130659971 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C22070199 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C9770341 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C142052008 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C142724271 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C144024400 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C149923435 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C187212893 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C203014093 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C205649164 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C22070199 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C58640448 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C71924100 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C9770341 @default.
• W3213065997 hasConceptScore W3213065997C99454951 @default.
• W3213065997 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W3213065997 hasLocation W32130659971 @default.
• W3213065997 hasLocation W32130659972 @default.
• W3213065997 hasLocation W32130659973 @default.
• W3213065997 hasOpenAccess W3213065997 @default.
• W3213065997 hasPrimaryLocation W32130659971 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W2172038160 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W2409957712 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W2410491650 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W2410673737 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W2415260763 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W2604682584 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W2902696397 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W4206812793 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W4251751544 @default.
• W3213065997 hasRelatedWork W3112508058 @default.
• W3213065997 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W3213065997 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3213065997 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3213065997 magId "3213065997" @default.
• W3213065997 workType "article" @default.