FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3213309855> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3213309855 endingPage "283" @default.
• W3213309855 startingPage "276" @default.
• W3213309855 abstract "Background In the Dutch breast cancer screening program, mammograms are preread by technologists to identify possible abnormalities, leading to warning signals (an audible and visual alert if the technologist observed an abnormality suspicious for cancer) for radiologists. The best moment to present these warning signals is unknown. Purpose To determine the effect that blinding of technologists' warning signals has on radiologists' early screening outcome measures during interpretation of mammograms. Materials and Methods In this prospective study from September 2017 to May 2019, on alternating months, radiologists were either blinded or nonblinded to the warning signals of the technologist when interpreting screening mammograms for breast cancer. All discrepancies between radiologists and technologists were reviewed during quality assurance sessions every 6 weeks, which could result in secondary recalls. The outcome measures of this study were recall rate, cancer detection rate, and positive predictive value of recall. A χ2 test was used to test for differences between the two groups. Results During the study period, 109 596 women (mean age, 62 years ± 7 [standard deviation]), including 53 291 in the blinded and 56 305 in the nonblinded groups, participated. The overall recall rate (including secondary recalls) was lower for women in the blinded group than in the nonblinded group (blinded: 1140 of 53 291 women [2.1%], nonblinded: 1372 of 56 305 women [2.4%]; P = .001). There was no evidence of cancer detection rate differences between the groups (blinded: 349 of 53 291 women [6.5 per 1000 screening examinations], nonblinded: 360 of 56 305 women [6.4 per 1000 screening examinations]; P = .75). The blinded group thus had a higher positive predictive value of recall (blinded: 349 of 1140 women [30.6%], nonblinded: 360 of 1372 women [26.2%]; P = .02). Conclusion While interpreting screening mammograms for breast cancer, radiologists blinded to technologists' warning signals had lower recall rates with higher positive predictive values than nonblinded radiologists, yet cancer detection rates seemed to remain unchanged. See also the editorial by Hofvind and Lee in this issue. © RSNA, 2021." @default.
• W3213309855 created "2021-11-22" @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5000939103 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5016724316 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5016866502 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5020235235 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5027472238 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5052830777 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5054473871 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5061073014 @default.
• W3213309855 creator A5072114754 @default.
• W3213309855 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W3213309855 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W3213309855 title "Added Value of Prereading Screening Mammograms for Breast Cancer by Radiologic Technologists on Early Screening Outcomes" @default.
• W3213309855 cites W1528652404 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W1878090051 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W1972235903 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W1985420901 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2015054034 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2031082405 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2071499452 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2099189269 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2107533468 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2113622720 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2114474866 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2116810347 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2128830034 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2139554360 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2139957534 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2158256125 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2404793916 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2502134830 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2607796523 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W2802804950 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W3000109728 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W3017276384 @default.
• W3213309855 cites W3094857195 @default.
• W3213309855 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210746" @default.
• W3213309855 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34751612" @default.
• W3213309855 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W3213309855 type Work @default.
• W3213309855 sameAs 3213309855 @default.
• W3213309855 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3213309855 countsByYear W32133098552022 @default.
• W3213309855 countsByYear W32133098552023 @default.
• W3213309855 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5000939103 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5016724316 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5016866502 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5020235235 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5027472238 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5052830777 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5054473871 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5061073014 @default.
• W3213309855 hasAuthorship W3213309855A5072114754 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C2778491387 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C2987098735 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C121608353 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C126322002 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C126838900 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C154945302 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C2778491387 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C2780472235 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C29456083 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C2987098735 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C2989005 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C41008148 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C530470458 @default.
• W3213309855 hasConceptScore W3213309855C71924100 @default.
• W3213309855 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3213309855 hasLocation W32133098551 @default.
• W3213309855 hasLocation W32133098552 @default.
• W3213309855 hasOpenAccess W3213309855 @default.
• W3213309855 hasPrimaryLocation W32133098551 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W1971803455 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W2041820331 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W2054351563 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W2120803900 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W2529896721 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W2549777276 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W2715581621 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W3026273959 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W3167666501 @default.
• W3213309855 hasRelatedWork W4312215125 @default.
• W3213309855 hasVolume "302" @default.
• W3213309855 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3213309855 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3213309855 magId "3213309855" @default.

• next