FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3213331369> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3213331369 abstract "Introduction: Coercion can be defined as the use of force to limit a person's choices. In Poland, coercive measures may tend to be overused. However, there is limited information regarding the attitudes of nurses toward coercion in psychiatric settings and the factors influencing any decisions to use coercion. Aims: To validate the Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS) for a group of psychiatric nurses and psychiatrists, to compare the said with the original Norwegian SACS version, and to compare nurses' attitudes with those displayed by psychiatrists. A second aim was to understand the relationship between self-efficacy and attitudes to coercion. Method: We surveyed 351 psychiatric nurses and psychiatrists rating SACS and GSES (General Self Efficacy Scale). We validated the SACS factor structure using confirmatory principal component factor analysis, calculated the internal consistency of subscales, and analyzed the test-retest reliability and face validity of the subscales themselves. Further, we analyzed the differences in attitudes toward coercion between nurses and psychiatrists, as well as whether there was an association between GSES and the SACS subscales. We compared the means on the SACS items between three countries—Germany, Norway, and Poland. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis of the Polish version of SACS found the same factor structure with three factors as was displayed in the original Norwegian SACS, except that one item was loaded on another factor. Internal consistency was acceptable for the factors on coercion as security and the coercion as offending, and unacceptable for the factor on coercion as treatment. Test-retest reliability was excellent for all the three subscales. Face validity was high for the factor coercion as security, partly present for coercion as offending, and not present for coercion as treatment. The subscale Coercion as Treatment was rated significantly higher by nurses than by psychiatrists, but there was no difference for the two other subscales. There was no significant association between the General Self-Efficacy Scale and any of the SACS subscales. The biggest differences in attitudes toward forms of coercion was noted between Poland and Germany. Discussion: The three-factor structure of SACS was the best solution for the Polish nurses and psychiatrists. The attitudes toward coercion differed between the two groups, but a low correlation was computed for the SACS subscales and self-efficacy. There is a cultural diversity visible amongst the three countries examined. Reduction in the use of coercion is a priority worldwide. More knowledge about the process involved in using coercive measures may contribute to this. The use of coercive interventions may harm patients and threaten patients' rights. Thus, education is needed for pre-service and in-service nurses alike." @default.
• W3213331369 created "2021-11-22" @default.
• W3213331369 creator A5001620182 @default.
• W3213331369 creator A5031357251 @default.
• W3213331369 creator A5063532878 @default.
• W3213331369 creator A5064035591 @default.
• W3213331369 creator A5076386706 @default.
• W3213331369 creator A5091829960 @default.
• W3213331369 date "2021-11-16" @default.
• W3213331369 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3213331369 title "Measuring Staff Attitudes to Coercion in Poland" @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1560264117 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1577922969 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1859081415 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1964123990 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1967888197 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1982867298 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1986516740 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1987038338 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W1993262859 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2032232472 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2061380594 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2063085086 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2093789343 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2100605438 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2133893329 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2340325456 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2481704025 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2517778011 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2564773570 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2613527772 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2771459216 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2793320726 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2793754073 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2888536738 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2890171161 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2914510263 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2969417245 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2971802815 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2992675108 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W2994980074 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3011657945 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3014387572 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3017725713 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3026208608 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3033767771 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3035005668 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3038772107 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W3123086213 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W4236291338 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W4252534912 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W4290449131 @default.
• W3213331369 cites W4302570818 @default.
• W3213331369 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745215" @default.
• W3213331369 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34867536" @default.
• W3213331369 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3213331369 type Work @default.
• W3213331369 sameAs 3213331369 @default.
• W3213331369 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3213331369 countsByYear W32133313692022 @default.
• W3213331369 countsByYear W32133313692023 @default.
• W3213331369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3213331369 hasAuthorship W3213331369A5001620182 @default.
• W3213331369 hasAuthorship W3213331369A5031357251 @default.
• W3213331369 hasAuthorship W3213331369A5063532878 @default.
• W3213331369 hasAuthorship W3213331369A5064035591 @default.
• W3213331369 hasAuthorship W3213331369A5076386706 @default.
• W3213331369 hasAuthorship W3213331369A5091829960 @default.
• W3213331369 hasBestOaLocation W32133313691 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C2777188754 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C40722632 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C63428231 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C105795698 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C118552586 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C121332964 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C138885662 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C151730666 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C15744967 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C2777188754 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C2777267654 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C2778755073 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C33923547 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C40722632 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C41895202 @default.
• W3213331369 hasConceptScore W3213331369C62520636 @default.

• next