FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3214377684> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3214377684 abstract "Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created an urgent need to act to reduce the spread of the virus and alleviate congestion from healthcare services, protect healthcare providers, and help them maintain satisfactory quality and safety of care. Remote COVID-19 monitoring platforms emerged as potential solutions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capacity and contribution of two different platforms used to remotely monitor patients with COVID-19 to maintain quality, safety, and patient engagement in care, as well as their acceptability, usefulness, and user-friendliness from the user's perspective. The first platform is focused on telecare phone calls (Telecare-Covid), and the second is a telemonitoring app (CareSimple-Covid). Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study. The data were collected through a phone survey from May to August 2020. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-test analysis. Participants' responses and comments on open-ended questions were analyzed using content analysis to identify certain issues and challenges and potential avenues for improving the platforms. Results: Fifty one patients participated in the study. Eighteen participants used the CareSimple-Covid platform and 33 participants used the Telecare-Covid platform. Overall, the satisfaction rate for quality and safety of care for the two platforms was 80%. Over 88% of the users on each platform considered the platforms' services to be engaging, useful, user-friendly, and appropriate to their needs. The survey identified a few significant differences in users' perceptions of each platform: empathy toward users and the quality and safety of the care received were rated significantly higher on the CareSimple-Covid platform than on the Telecare-Covid platform. Users appreciated four aspects of these telehealth approaches: (1) the ease of access to services and the availability of care team members; (2) the user-friendliness of the platforms; (3) the continuity of care provided, and (4) the wide range of services delivered. Users identified some technical limitations and raised certain issues, such as the importance of maintaining human contact, data security, and confidentiality. Improvement suggestions include promoting access to connected devices; enhancing communications between institutions, healthcare users, and the public on confidentiality and personal data protection standards; and integrating a participatory approach to telehealth platform development and deployment efforts. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that the two remote monitoring platforms are well-received by users, with very few significant differences between them concerning users' experiences and views. This type of program could be considered for use in a post-pandemic era and for other post-hospitalization clienteles. To maximize efficiency, the areas for improvement and the issues identified should be addressed with a patient-centered approach." @default.
• W3214377684 created "2021-11-22" @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5000072728 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5017094518 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5026675647 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5030220342 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5030332100 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5035943593 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5057759683 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5063980946 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5070596273 @default.
• W3214377684 creator A5087304045 @default.
• W3214377684 date "2021-11-08" @default.
• W3214377684 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W3214377684 title "Remote Patient Monitoring Program for COVID-19 Patients Following Hospital Discharge: A Cross-Sectional Study" @default.
• W3214377684 cites W1648047814 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W1816775564 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2005806657 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2012378416 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2033527727 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2051399804 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2087279293 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2412012562 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2606895318 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2765128092 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2782220219 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2783200326 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2891342490 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2905099311 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2914268080 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2940366107 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W2949752363 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3009063690 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3010698037 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3012625735 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3033248051 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3036676580 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3040826030 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3043065230 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3044144653 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3080648857 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3082673858 @default.
• W3214377684 cites W3159181963 @default.
• W3214377684 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.721044" @default.
• W3214377684 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8630581" @default.
• W3214377684 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34859244" @default.
• W3214377684 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3214377684 type Work @default.
• W3214377684 sameAs 3214377684 @default.
• W3214377684 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W3214377684 countsByYear W32143776842022 @default.
• W3214377684 countsByYear W32143776842023 @default.
• W3214377684 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5000072728 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5017094518 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5026675647 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5030220342 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5030332100 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5035943593 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5057759683 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5063980946 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5070596273 @default.
• W3214377684 hasAuthorship W3214377684A5087304045 @default.
• W3214377684 hasBestOaLocation W32143776841 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C2780519836 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConcept C89623803 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C105795698 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C111472728 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C138885662 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C142052008 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C142724271 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C159110408 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C160735492 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C162324750 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C2778707766 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C2779134260 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C2779530757 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C2779891985 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C2780519836 @default.
• W3214377684 hasConceptScore W3214377684C3008058167 @default.

• next