FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W321485840> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W321485840 startingPage "25" @default.
• W321485840 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides in part nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.1 The Supreme Court has held that the Fourteenth Amendment's due process language forbids state governments to take private property without compensation.2 When the appropriation of property is clear and complete-as, for example, with the condemnation of all of someone's real property and its subsequent destruction to make way for a public highway-there is general agreement that a taking has occurred and compensation is required.3 However, governmental action can intrude on the owner's rights in less drastic ways, such as forbidding an owner from erecting structures on his land while allowing him to retain fee title,1 a typical example of the so-called regulatory taking. The two most recent Supreme Court cases on the topic5 are a mixed bag for property owners, the legal principles governing the area remain somewhat muddled, and the regulatory takings field continues to engender controversy.6 The sharp divisions among commentators stem from a number of factors, including differences over constitutional interpretation,7 fundamental disagreement on the nature and scope of property rights,8 differing economic theories,9 and ultimately the conflict IMAGE FORMULA7 between legal positivism10 on one hand and and rights on the other.11 A number of commentators have observed that a higher law underlies the U.S. Constitution.12 It has been suggested that the Declaration of Independence provides a concise statement of this natural law, and the rights that flow from it; and that the Constitution should be interpreted in light of the Declaration.13 This article is based on just such a of constitutional interpretation, as Professor Gerber set forth in his seminal work To Secure These Rights,14 one that he terms originalism.,15 To avoid confusion with modern welfare-state liberalism, I shall refer to Gerber's of constitutional interpretation as liberal originalism.16 This article attempts to: * review the heritage of and rights and how they are to be applied to constitutional interpretation; IMAGE FORMULA9 * review the background of eminent domain and the evolution of regulatory takings law; * survey various commentators on the issue; * propose and outline an approach to regulatory takings that is consistent with the rights to life, liberty and property guaranteed by the positive of the U.S. Constitution; and * demonstrate how the proposed approach would be applied to the cases to obtain both justice and predictability. The approach I set forth is somewhat similar to that which Professor Epstein took in his famous work on takings,17 that a pro-property, Lockean stance is assumed. However, there are a number of significant differences,18 based on the fact that Epstein's thinking is largely utilitarian,19 whereas this article draws on the and rights traditions of the Enlightenment and the Founding. II.NATURAL LAW, NATURAL RIGHTS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: A PRIMER A. Introduction Too often, school brings not a mention of rights or law, except, perhaps, by way of some off-handed comment on the declaratory theory of law20 (relegated to the status of a quaint anachronism). It is a far safer bet that the student will have been exposed to the received wisdom of the arch-positivist Justice Holmes, and his famous disparagement of the brooding omnipresence in the sky.21 Let us commence, therefore, a lesson that we can only wish will again prove unnecessary someday. IMAGE FORMULA14 The concept of can be traced to classical antiquity. …" @default.
• W321485840 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W321485840 creator A5020267432 @default.
• W321485840 date "2002-10-01" @default.
• W321485840 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W321485840 title "A Natural Rights Approach to Regulatory Takings" @default.
• W321485840 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W321485840 type Work @default.
• W321485840 sameAs 321485840 @default.
• W321485840 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W321485840 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W321485840 hasAuthorship W321485840A5020267432 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C126806153 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2776390805 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2776656818 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2776931063 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2777538416 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2777828199 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2778607876 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2778803647 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C2779362956 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W321485840 hasConcept C86511162 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C126806153 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C138885662 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C144024400 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C17744445 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C190253527 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C199539241 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2776154427 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2776390805 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2776656818 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2776931063 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2777538416 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2777828199 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2778272461 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2778607876 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2778803647 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C2779362956 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C41895202 @default.
• W321485840 hasConceptScore W321485840C86511162 @default.
• W321485840 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W321485840 hasLocation W3214858401 @default.
• W321485840 hasOpenAccess W321485840 @default.
• W321485840 hasPrimaryLocation W3214858401 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W101276832 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W1494846420 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W1524540231 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W1532265741 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W1570482418 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W1590903038 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W172567971 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W2265745823 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W2268151935 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W2342979591 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W2493450938 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W2573488391 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W2734940661 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W275122864 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W2948436926 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W3096717155 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W3123919679 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W3124870766 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W750834673 @default.
• W321485840 hasRelatedWork W82914394 @default.
• W321485840 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W321485840 isParatext "false" @default.
• W321485840 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W321485840 magId "321485840" @default.
• W321485840 workType "article" @default.