FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3215026244> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3215026244 abstract "&lt;p class=&quot;western&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Within the past decade, newly collected GPS data and geochronological constraints have resulted in refinement of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) models for Antarctica. These are critical to understanding ice mass changes at present-day. A correction needs to be made when using space gravity for ice mass balance assessments as any vertical movements of the solid Earth masquerade as changes in ice mass, and must be carefully removed. The main upshot of the new Antarctic GIA models is a downward revision of negative ice mass trends deduced from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), resulting from a reduced GIA correction. This revision places GRACE inferred trend in mass balance within the 1-&amp;#963; uncertainty of mass balance deduced by altimetry. Because uncertainties in Holocene ice history and the low viscosity rheology beneath the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) continue to vex further improvement in predictions of present-day GIA gravity rate, more emphasis has been given to regional-scale GIA models. Here we use a Bayesian method to explore the gravimetric GIA trend over Antarctica, both with and without the impact of a late Pleistocene Antarctic ice loads, along with the contribution of oceanic loads. We call this model without loads associated with Antarctica a baseline for regional GIA models to build upon. We consider variations of the radial mantle viscosity profile and the volume of continental-scale ice sheets during the last glacial cycle. The modeled baseline GIA is mainly controlled by the lower mantle viscosity and continental levering caused by ocean loading. We find that the predicted baseline GIA correction weakly depends on the ice history. This correction averages to +28.4 [16.5&amp;#8211;41.9, 95% confidence] Gt/yr. In contrast, with Pleistocene Antarctic-proximal ice included, the total modeled mass trend due to GIA is +73.7 [30.1&amp;#8211;114.7] Gt/yr. A baseline GIA correction of 28.4 Gt/yr is of order 50% of the mean net mass trend measured during the period 1992-2017. The statistical analysis provides tools for synthesizing any regional Antarctic GIA model with a self-consistent far-field component. This may prove important for accounting for both global and regional 3-D variations in mantle viscosity.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p class=&quot;western&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;#169; 2020 California Institute of Technology.&lt;br /&gt;Government sponsorship acknowledged. This work was performed at the California Institute of Technology's Jet Propulsion Laboratory under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Cryosphere Science Program. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;" @default.
• W3215026244 created "2021-12-06" @default.
• W3215026244 creator A5025648701 @default.
• W3215026244 creator A5027115044 @default.
• W3215026244 date "2020-10-02" @default.
• W3215026244 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3215026244 title "A baseline Antarctic GIA correction for space gravimetry" @default.
• W3215026244 doi "https://doi.org/10.5194/gstm2020-17" @default.
• W3215026244 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3215026244 type Work @default.
• W3215026244 sameAs 3215026244 @default.
• W3215026244 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3215026244 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3215026244 hasAuthorship W3215026244A5025648701 @default.
• W3215026244 hasAuthorship W3215026244A5027115044 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C100970517 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C123750103 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C140711978 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConcept C49204034 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C100970517 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C114793014 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C123750103 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C127313418 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C13280743 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C140711978 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C205649164 @default.
• W3215026244 hasConceptScore W3215026244C49204034 @default.
• W3215026244 hasLocation W32150262441 @default.
• W3215026244 hasOpenAccess W3215026244 @default.
• W3215026244 hasPrimaryLocation W32150262441 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W10584060 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W12430315 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W17712877 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W28251130 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W28375462 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W29634908 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W30897510 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W41637823 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W43581079 @default.
• W3215026244 hasRelatedWork W65624068 @default.
• W3215026244 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3215026244 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3215026244 magId "3215026244" @default.
• W3215026244 workType "article" @default.