FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3217477918> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3217477918 endingPage "321" @default.
• W3217477918 startingPage "309" @default.
• W3217477918 abstract "The diversity, abundance, and health of wild bees is jeopardized primarily by land-use modifications, among other global change drivers.Defining and measuring health in wild bees requires an integrative approach across disciplines.We use elements from chemistry, stoichiometry, ecology, physiology, pathology, and genetics to (i) contribute to a more comprehensive definition of wild bee 'health', and (ii) define a framework linking bee health with floral resource/nutritional landscapes through assessing species-specific nutritional niches.We suggest a novel and holistic approach for capturing bee health through combining field and laboratory tools.Knowledge gained by applying this framework will serve as a blueprint for stakeholders engaged in pollinator conservation. Wild bee populations are declining due to human activities, such as land use change, which strongly affect the composition and diversity of available plants and food sources. The chemical composition of food (i.e., nutrition) in turn determines the health, resilience, and fitness of bees. For pollinators, however, the term 'health' is recent and is subject to debate, as is the interaction between nutrition and wild bee health. We define bee health as a multidimensional concept in a novel integrative framework linking bee biological traits (physiology, stoichiometry, and disease) and environmental factors (floral diversity and nutritional landscapes). Linking information on tolerated nutritional niches and health in different bee species will allow us to better predict their distribution and responses to environmental change, and thus support wild pollinator conservation. Wild bee populations are declining due to human activities, such as land use change, which strongly affect the composition and diversity of available plants and food sources. The chemical composition of food (i.e., nutrition) in turn determines the health, resilience, and fitness of bees. For pollinators, however, the term 'health' is recent and is subject to debate, as is the interaction between nutrition and wild bee health. We define bee health as a multidimensional concept in a novel integrative framework linking bee biological traits (physiology, stoichiometry, and disease) and environmental factors (floral diversity and nutritional landscapes). Linking information on tolerated nutritional niches and health in different bee species will allow us to better predict their distribution and responses to environmental change, and thus support wild pollinator conservation. Bees decline because their food sources disappearAnimals pollinate >85% of flowering plants and 75% of the leading crops worldwide [1.Klein A.-M. et al.Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.Proc. Biol. Sci. 2007; 274: 303-313Crossref PubMed Scopus (3270) Google Scholar] which provide food and medicines for other animals and humankind. They also support natural habitats and play a key role in plant productivity, food webs, and ultimately in human well-being [1.Klein A.-M. et al.Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.Proc. Biol. Sci. 2007; 274: 303-313Crossref PubMed Scopus (3270) Google Scholar, 2.Klein A-M. et al.Relevance of wild and managed bees for human well-being.Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018; 26: 82-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar, 3.Ollerton J. et al.How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?.Oikos. 2011; 120: 321-326Crossref Scopus (1564) Google Scholar]. Bees (Apidae) are the most important group of pollinators, and the vast majority are represented by wild species (~20 000 species) [4.Potts S. Assessment Report on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production – Summary for Policymakers. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), 2016Google Scholar].Alarmingly, many wild bee populations are declining due to the impact of different biotic and abiotic stressors caused by human activities that act alone or in combination, such as pesticides, invasive species, pathogens, intensive land-use, and climate change [5.Dicks L. et al.A global assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline.Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2021; 5: 1453-1461Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar, 6.Eggleton P. The state of the world’s insects.Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2020; 45: 61-82Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar, 7.Rhodes C.J. Pollinator decline – an ecological calamity in the making?.Sci. Prog. 2018; 101: 121-160Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar, 8.Storkey J. et al.Wild pollinators in arable habitats: trends, threats and opportunities.in: Hurford C. The Changing Status of Arable Habitats in Europe: A Nature Conservation Review. Springer International, 2020: 187-201Crossref Google Scholar, 9.Zattara E.E. Aizen M.A. Worldwide occurrence records suggest a global decline in bee species richness.One Earth. 2021; 4: 114-123Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (60) Google Scholar, 10.Goulson D. et al.Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers.Science. 2015; 347: 1255957Crossref PubMed Scopus (1702) Google Scholar, 11.Potts S.G. et al.Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010; 25: 345-353Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3176) Google Scholar]. In particular, agricultural intensification appears to negatively impact on wild bee communities [12.Lichtenberg E.M. et al.A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.Glob. Change Biol. 2017; 23: 4946-4957Crossref PubMed Scopus (143) Google Scholar,13.Raven P.H. Wagner D.L. Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2021; 118e2002548117Crossref Google Scholar]. In fact, overall biodiversity typically decreases with increasing land-use intensity [14.Kleijn D. et al.Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.Ecol. Lett. 2006; 9: 243-254Crossref PubMed Scopus (725) Google Scholar,15.Newbold T. et al.A global model of the response of tropical and sub-tropical forest biodiversity to anthropogenic pressures.Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014; 281: 20141371PubMed Google Scholar], which directly or indirectly leads to loss of floral diversity and nesting sites [10.Goulson D. et al.Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers.Science. 2015; 347: 1255957Crossref PubMed Scopus (1702) Google Scholar,16.Thomson D.M. Local bumble bee decline linked to recovery of honey bees, drought effects on floral resources.Ecol. Lett. 2016; 19: 1247-1255Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar], and may alter pathogen prevalence [17.Figueroa L.L. et al.Landscape simplification shapes pathogen prevalence in plant–pollinator networks.Ecol. Lett. 2020; 23: 1212-1222Crossref PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar, 18.Piot N. et al.More is less: mass-flowering fruit tree crops dilute parasite transmission between bees.Int. J. Parasitol. 2021; 51: 777-785Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar, 19.Smart M. et al.Linking measures of colony and individual honey bee health to survival among apiaries exposed to varying agricultural land use.PLoS ONE. 2016; 11e0152685Crossref Scopus (104) Google Scholar]. Declining floral diversity in turn decreases the spectrum of flowering plants that are available as food sources, and therefore restricts the nutritional landscape accessible to bees [20.Michener C.D. The Bees of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007Google Scholar, 21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar, 22.Ziska L.H. et al.Rising atmospheric CO2 is reducing the protein concentration of a floral pollen source essential for North American bees.Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016; 283: 20160414Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 23.Requier F. et al.Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds.Ecol. Appl. 2015; 25: 881-890Crossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google Scholar].Nutritional landscapes of beesAs nutritional intake and thus the nutrient composition (henceforth referred to as nutritional quality) of food strongly determine the health, resilience to pathogens, and fitness of animals [24.Simpson S.J. Raubenheimer D. The Nature of Nutrition: A Unifying Framework from Animal Adaptation to Human Obesity. Princeton University Press, 2012Crossref Google Scholar], access to food resources that enable diverse and balanced nutrition is one key driver of population stability [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar]. In this context, we consider a nutrient to be any chemical compound (i.e., from chemical elements, phospholipids, and amino acids to 'group components' such as proteins) that are part of the food/nutrition of bees. Bees obtain most nutrients and several potential medically active plant secondary metabolites from flowering plants by consuming mostly nectar and pollen [20.Michener C.D. The Bees of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007Google Scholar,25.Koch H. et al.Flagellum removal by a nectar metabolite inhibits infectivity of a bumblebee parasite.Curr. Biol. 2019; 29: 3494-3500Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar,26.Stevenson P.C. For antagonists and mutualists: the paradox of insect toxic secondary metabolites in nectar and pollen.Phytochem. Rev. 2020; 19: 603-614Crossref Scopus (17) Google Scholar]. Nectar primarily provides carbohydrates for maintaining energy and metabolic processes, whereas pollen is the main source of all other macronutrients (i.e., protein and fat) and micronutrients (e.g., vitamins, sterols) that are required for tissue homeostasis, development (e.g., ovary development), and larval growth [27.Filipiak M. A better understanding of bee nutritional ecology is needed to optimize conservation strategies for wild bees – the application of ecological stoichiometry.Insects. 2018; 9: 3Crossref Scopus (16) Google Scholar, 28.Nicolson S.W. Bee food: the chemistry and nutritional value of nectar, pollen and mixtures of the two.Afr. Zool. 2011; 46: 197-204Crossref Google Scholar, 29.Wright G.A. et al.Nutritional physiology and ecology of honey bees.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018; 63: 327-344Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar]. Ideally, floral communities provide food resources of both sufficient quality and quantity. The quantity of food resources is determined by the abundance of flowers present in the landscape – namely the number of plants/flowers present per species and the overall amount of flowering species [30.Timberlake T.P. et al.Phenology of farmland floral resources reveals seasonal gaps in nectar availability for bumblebees.J. Appl. Ecol. 2019; 56: 1585-1596Crossref Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. The quality of food resources depends on the composition of different flowering plant species because each plant species provides pollen and/or nectar with a specific nutrient profile [31.Jachuła J. et al.Habitat heterogeneity helps to mitigate pollinator nectar sugar deficit and discontinuity in an agricultural landscape.Sci. Total Environ. 2021; 782146909Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar]. In fact, the nutritional profiles of pollen and nectar vary greatly among different plant species [32.Belsky J. Joshi N.K. Impact of biotic and abiotic stressors on managed and feral bees.Insects. 2019; 10: 233Crossref Scopus (37) Google Scholar, 33.Palmer-Young E.C. et al.Chemistry of floral rewards: intra- and interspecific variability of nectar and pollen secondary metabolites across taxa.Ecol. Monogr. 2019; 89e01335Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar, 34.Vaudo A.D. et al.Pollen protein: lipid macronutrient ratios may guide broad patterns of bee species floral preferences.Insects. 2020; 11: 132Crossref Scopus (41) Google Scholar, 35.Requier F. et al.Limitation of complementary resources affects colony growth, foraging behavior, and reproduction in bumble bees.Ecology. 2020; 101e02946Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar] and even between plant individuals of the same species growing in different plant communities [36.Venjakob C. et al.Inter-individual nectar chemistry changes of field scabious, Knautia arvensis.Insects. 2020; 11: 2Crossref Scopus (5) Google Scholar]. Floral communities, which are characterized by a specific composition and diversity of flowering plant species, consequently determine resource availability and diversity, and thus determine the nutritional landscape in which bees are foraging [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar]. More details of variation in nutritional quality in pollen and nectar, the effect of different diets on bee performance and fitness, and differences in foraging preferences among bees are given in Vaudo et al. [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar].Although much less well understood, the nutritional needs of bee species are also expected to differ substantially between bee species [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar]. The sustainability of bee populations thus depends on flowering plant communities that provide sufficient amounts of the different nutrients required because the quality of food, and in particular of pollen, directly determines offspring survival and development, and can therefore influence the entire population [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar,37.Filipiak Z.M. Filipiak M. The scarcity of specific nutrients in wild bee larval food negatively influences certain life history traits.Biology. 2020; 9: 12Crossref Scopus (6) Google Scholar,38.Moerman R. et al.Pollen nutrients better explain bumblebee colony development than pollen diversity.Insect Conserv. Divers. 2017; 10: 171-179Crossref Scopus (39) Google Scholar].Surprisingly, the interaction between flowering plant communities, the available nutritional landscape, and the health status of different wild bee species has hitherto received little attention (cf [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar,34.Vaudo A.D. et al.Pollen protein: lipid macronutrient ratios may guide broad patterns of bee species floral preferences.Insects. 2020; 11: 132Crossref Scopus (41) Google Scholar]). This knowledge is, however, crucial for determining how floral communities and respective conservation measures can support wild bee populations. We therefore propose a conceptual framework for how anthropogenic changes in flowering plant communities can affect bee communities by altering the nutritional landscape and thus niches available to support healthy wild bee populations.Measuring wild bee healthAlthough human health is understood as the physical, mental, and social well-being of an individual or population, the health of wildlife has generally been understood as the absence of disease [39.Stephen C. Toward a modernized definition of wildlife health.J. Wildl. Dis. 2014; 50: 427-430Crossref PubMed Google Scholar]. For pollinator communities, the term 'health' only recently appeared in the literature and its precise definition is still subject to debate [40.López-Uribe M.M. et al.Defining pollinator health: a holistic approach based on ecological, genetic, and physiological factors.Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2020; 8: 269-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar]. López-Uribe et al. suggested a multilevel approach and the use of various parameters to measure bee health at the individual, colony, and population level [40.López-Uribe M.M. et al.Defining pollinator health: a holistic approach based on ecological, genetic, and physiological factors.Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2020; 8: 269-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar]. The health status of a population should then be a direct consequence of the average health status of individuals, where population size is likely to correlate positively with average individual health.We propose to apply a multidimensional concept of bee health to wild bees – defined as the status of well-being of each individual as a result of their interaction with the local environment (Figure 1). We suggest that all or several of the following physiological parameters should be recorded and integrated to comprehensively capture individual bee health – the composition and amount of stored nutrients in bee bodies (such as proteins, lipids, glycogen, chemical elements), body size [41.Dellicour S. et al.Distribution and predictors of wing shape and size variability in three sister species of solitary bees.PLoS ONE. 2017; 12e0173109Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar], pathogen load, beneficial microbiota [42.Engel P. et al.The bee microbiome: impact on bee health and model for evolution and ecology of host–microbe interactions.mBio. 2016; 7e02164-15Crossref Scopus (130) Google Scholar], immunocompetence [43.Alaux C. et al.Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence.Biol. Lett. 2010; 6: 562-565Crossref PubMed Scopus (454) Google Scholar], and fertility [44.Keller A. et al.(More than) Hitchhikers through the network: the shared microbiome of bees and flowers.Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2020; 44: 8-15Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar].Physiological parameters were shown to be important for understanding the sensitivity of species to environmental modifications [45.Tracy C.R. et al.The importance of physiological ecology in conservation biology.Integr. Comp. Biol. 2006; 46: 1191-1205Crossref PubMed Scopus (72) Google Scholar] because the physiology of individuals responds before changes in populations become visible [46.Ellis R.D. et al.Integrating landscape ecology and conservation physiology.Landsc. Ecol. 2012; 27: 1-12Crossref Scopus (90) Google Scholar]. For instance, diet quality correlates with increased levels of the storage protein and antioxidant vitellogenin in individual honey bees, and this in turn correlates with higher overwintering survival of the entire colony [19.Smart M. et al.Linking measures of colony and individual honey bee health to survival among apiaries exposed to varying agricultural land use.PLoS ONE. 2016; 11e0152685Crossref Scopus (104) Google Scholar,47.Alaux C. et al.A ‘landscape physiology’ approach for assessing bee health highlights the benefits of floral landscape enrichment and semi-natural habitats.Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 40568Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar]. Energy storage is crucial for bee survival. The main categories of macronutrients used for energy storage in insects (glycogen, lipids, and proteins) affect several life-history traits such as dispersal capacity, reproduction, diapause, and survival [48.Arrese E.L. Soulages J.L. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010; 55: 207-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (1178) Google Scholar]. Moreover, both macro- and micronutrients are acquired through the consumption of pollen and nectar, and thus are at the interface between bees and floral resources. Variations in floral resource availability will therefore influence the energy budget and ultimately the health of bees.Additional physiological health parameters sensu lato include morphometrics, stoichiometry, microbial communities, and pathogen loads. For example, wing morphometry and fluctuating asymmetry were found to correlate with different stressors [49.de Freitas Brito T. et al.Orchid bees (Apidae, Euglossini) from oil palm plantations in Eastern Amazon have larger but not asymmetrical wings.Neotrop. Entomol. 2021; 50: 388-397Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 50.Gerard M. et al.Stressful conditions reveal decrease in size, modification of shape but relatively stable asymmetry in bumblebee wings.Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 15169Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 51.Lima C.B.S. et al.Morphometric differences and fluctuating asymmetry in Melipona subnitida Ducke 1910 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in different types of housing.Braz. J. Biol. 2016; 76: 845-850Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar]. In addition, floral composition and diversity are known to shape the bee microbiome composition, particularly in solitary bees, with consequences for nutrient uptake, detoxification, immunity, and health [44.Keller A. et al.(More than) Hitchhikers through the network: the shared microbiome of bees and flowers.Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2020; 44: 8-15Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar,52.Dharampal P.S. et al.Pollen-borne microbes shape bee fitness.Proc. Biol. Sci. 2019; 286: 20182894Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar, 53.Rothman J.A. et al.The bumble bee microbiome increases survival of bees exposed to selenate toxicity.Environ. Microbiol. 2019; 21: 3417-3429Crossref Scopus (16) Google Scholar, 54.Voulgari-Kokota A. et al.Drivers, diversity, and functions of the solitary-bee microbiota.Trends Microbiol. 2019; 27: 1034-1044Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar]. By defining stoichiometric phenotypes (i.e., the elemental composition of bee bodies) [55.Jeyasingh P.D. et al.Testing the ecological consequences of evolutionary change using elements.Ecol. Evol. 2014; 4: 528-538Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar], deviations from optimal phenotypes, as expected in nutritionally impoverished landscapes and for declining populations, can be revealed, which can then also indicate reduced health.All physiological health parameters mentioned previously are likely affected not only by multiple environmental parameters related to variation in floral resource diversity, abundance, and quality but also by environmental pollutants (e.g., pesticides, antibiotics, heavy metals) and pathogens (Figure 1). Measurement of multiple variables can therefore provide a more complete picture of pollinator health status than focusing on a single parameter.Floral diversity as an environmental driver of bee healthFloral diversity, abundance, and community composition correlate with the abundance and diversity of wild bee species [56.Albrecht M. et al.The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis.Ecol. Lett. 2020; 23: 1488-1498Crossref PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar,57.Dainese M. et al.A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production.Sci. Adv. 2019; 5eaax0121Crossref PubMed Scopus (245) Google Scholar] through food availability [58.Kaluza B.F. et al.Social bees are fitter in more biodiverse environments.Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 12353Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar], nutritional quality or content [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar,27.Filipiak M. A better understanding of bee nutritional ecology is needed to optimize conservation strategies for wild bees – the application of ecological stoichiometry.Insects. 2018; 9: 3Crossref Scopus (16) Google Scholar,59.Roulston T.H. Goodell K. The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010; 56: 293-312Crossref Scopus (325) Google Scholar,60.Scheper J. et al.Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014; 111: 17552Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar], and resource phenology [23.Requier F. et al.Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds.Ecol. Appl. 2015; 25: 881-890Crossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google Scholar,58.Kaluza B.F. et al.Social bees are fitter in more biodiverse environments.Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 12353Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar,61.Blüthgen N. Klein A-M. Functional complementarity and specialisation: the role of biodiversity in plant–pollinator interactions.Basic Appl. Ecol. 2011; 12: 282-291Crossref Scopus (281) Google Scholar]. Bees thrive in environments where plant species diversity is high [12.Lichtenberg E.M. et al.A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.Glob. Change Biol. 2017; 23: 4946-4957Crossref PubMed Scopus (143) Google Scholar,62.Crone E.E. Williams N.M. Bumble bee colony dynamics: quantifying the importance of land use and floral resources for colony growth and queen production.Ecol. Lett. 2016; 19: 460-468Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar,63.Goulson D. et al.Colony growth of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats.Oecologia. 2002; 130: 267-273Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar], as is the diversity and quantity of available food resources [23.Requier F. et al.Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds.Ecol. Appl. 2015; 25: 881-890Crossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google Scholar,64.Kaluza B.F. et al.Generalist social bees maximize diversity intake in plant species-rich and resource-abundant environments.Ecosphere. 2017; 8e01758Crossref Scopus (26) Google Scholar,65.Trinkl M. et al.Floral species richness correlates with changes in the nutritional quality of larval diets in a stingless bee.Insects. 2020; 11: 2Crossref Scopus (9) Google Scholar]. Moreover, resource diversity increases the opportunities for specialist (oligolectic) bee species with restricted pollen host plants to find suitable food resources. In generalist (polylectic) species, access to a diverse spectrum of resources supports immunity, health, performance, and survival (Table 1), presumably through ready access to adequate nutrition and beneficial plant secondary metabolites. By contrast, chronic intake of monotonous, nonsuitable, low quality, or toxic food reduces the immune-competence and vitellogenin levels of bees, thus affecting bee health through 'nutritional stress' [47.Alaux C. et al.A ‘landscape physiology’ approach for assessing bee health highlights the benefits of floral landscape enrichment and semi-natural habitats.Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 40568Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar,66.Brunner F.S. et al.Protein-poor diet reduces host-specific immune gene expression in Bombus terrestris.Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014; 281: 20140128Crossref PubMed Google Scholar]. Poor nutrition can also lead to higher susceptibility to disease [67.Dolezal A.G. Toth A.L. Feedbacks between nutrition and disease in honey bee health.Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018; 26: 114-119Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar] and pesticides [68.Tosi S. et al.Neonicotinoid pesticides and nutritional stress synergistically reduce survival in honey bees.Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017; 284: 20171711Crossref PubMed Scopus (72) Google Scholar]. In fact, nutritional stress as a consequence of restricted access to adequate floral resources is considered to be one of the main drivers of bee pollinator decline [21.Vaudo A.D. et al.Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.Soc. Insects Vectors Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015; 10: 133-141Google Scholar,69.Bartomeus I. et al.Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013; 110: 4656-4660Crossref PubMed Scopus (309) Google Scholar,70.Leach M.E. Drummond F. A review of native wild bee nutritional health.Int. J. Ecol. 2018; 2018: 9607246Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar]. Although floral diversity may not provide added value per se or automatically yield beneficial synergistic effects compared with higher-quality monofloral diets [34.Vaudo A.D. et al.Pollen protein: lipid macronutrient ratios may guide broad patterns of bee species floral preferences.Insects. 2020; 11: 132Crossref Scopus (41) Google Scholar,71.Klaus F. et al.Floral resource diversification promotes solitary bee reproduction and may offset insecticide effects – evidence from a semi-field experiment.Ecol. Lett. 2021; 24: 668-675Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar,72.Stuligross C. Williams N.M. Pesticide and resource stressors additively impair wild bee reproduction.Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2020; 287: 20201390Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar], it can clearly mitigate the negative effects of poor diets and provide overall more choices to various bee species (Table 1).Table 1Effect of floral diet on bee health: key studies on the effects of monofloral and polyfloral diets on the health and performance of different generalist (i.e., polylectic) bee species under both laboratory and field conditionsExperimentBee speciesEffectsResponse variableRefsLandscapes, enriched or not with melliferous catch crops; effect on colony overwinteringHoneybee (Apis mellifera)Access to more diverse floral resources was linked to a higher bee vitality (vitellogenin expression level)Bee physiology (vitellogenin expression level)[47.Alaux C. et al.A ‘landscape physiology’ approach for assessing bee health highlights the benefits of floral landscape enrichment and semi-natural habitats.Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 40568Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar]Monofloral diet combined with pesticides; effects on colony performanceBuff tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris)Additive negative effects of monofloral diet and pesticides on colony growth, drone size, and reproduc" @default.
• W3217477918 created "2021-12-06" @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5002851040 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5003617021 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5003919314 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5004577729 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5006977922 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5009710583 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5010746423 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5013368224 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5025206730 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5025672596 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5036062504 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5065174040 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5066515722 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5068261075 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5070924304 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5072540217 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5074337286 @default.
• W3217477918 creator A5077848595 @default.
• W3217477918 date "2022-04-01" @default.
• W3217477918 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3217477918 title "Critical links between biodiversity and health in wild bee conservation" @default.
• W3217477918 cites W1928065227 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2003712132 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2028264182 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2037145972 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2044325671 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2051204408 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2059192057 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2060683904 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2064071430 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2066447990 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2086702007 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2089788640 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2102378924 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2104930680 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2107498496 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2109158012 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2109827738 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2117472420 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2120456415 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2123759872 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2127607738 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2132044804 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2135011388 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2136507097 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2138832709 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2160617120 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2168886052 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2169205933 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2171259412 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2178714965 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2235746495 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2278886168 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2298259636 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2311037450 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2312463474 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2336522939 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2344104367 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2344927143 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2468466828 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2510636740 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2517389126 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2520284296 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2549151811 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2549404130 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2572468587 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2593746987 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2594486683 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2601126105 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2601431821 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2605379941 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2605899719 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2748563694 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2770467210 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2781258579 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2792297374 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2792345178 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2808278214 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2808469394 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2883311799 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2887312432 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2894887132 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2895056705 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2898442004 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2900169069 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2904608920 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2921446237 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2936855140 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2940019482 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2941528804 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2945286692 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2965280764 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2969558000 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2970593363 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2970979276 @default.
• W3217477918 cites W2979475798 @default.

• next