FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W331501571> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W331501571 startingPage "825" @default.
• W331501571 abstract "Since 1965, the Washington Law Review has had forty-three Editorsin-Chief, roughly ninety executive editors, more than seven hundred and fifty student members, and one faculty advisor-Professor Richard Kummert. As extraordinary as any period of service extending more than four decades may seem, those who know Professor Kummert consider it business as usual. As one former dean recently stated describing Professor Kummert, in the history of the law school, no person has been entrusted with so much responsibility by so many deans. Beyond his perennial service to the law review, Professor Kummert has single-handedly governed the school's all-important admissions program for decades, chaired every major committee the school, served as an associate dean on four occasions, and been a trusted advisor to many law school deans and countless students and faculty colleagues. But this tribute is not about the quantum of Professor Kummert's service to the law school community (something others are more qualified to discuss), nor his length of service to this law review (forty-three years pretty much says it all). The focus here is my personal experience with Professor Kummert and how he helped me many years ago. I am certain that any of the other forty-two Editors-in-Chief who had the pleasure of working with Professor Kummert, if given an opportunity to reflect and comment, could share comparable experiences that illustrate the quality of his efforts and the impacts of his contributions. During my tenure as Editor-in-Chief of the law review (and I suspect that of many others), certain conditions Professor Kummert's job particularly challenging and essential. I came with no experience. I knew only that I would manage a group of bright, unpaid student colleagues to produce four issues of the Review. The sheer scope of the effort took a toll and stressed many relationships. Some of my colleagues, thankfully, worked tirelessly and brilliantly to make it happen. Others did little more than routinely announce to anyone within earshot that they had made law review. As the year wore on, doubts regarding the value of the entire effort occasionally surfaced. My thoughts would wander to a crude cost/benefit analysis to assess the totality of the experience, often concluding that the burdens and opportunity costs of the effort trumped any definable benefits. All these doubts disappeared when the experience ended and I tackled the challenge of becoming a competent practicing lawyer. And, surprisingly, the potential benefits that I had always factored into my cost/benefit analysis were not the basis for this enhanced appreciation of my law review experience. The experience had not me a significantly better writer or enabled me to secure a better job. And as for the value of what we actually published, I still wonder whether anyone ever read volume forty-eight. My belated appreciation for my law review experience was triggered by a realization that my association with Professor Kummert and certain other people over many months under trying circumstances had taught me some valuable personal lessons. I had no real awareness or appreciation of these lessons during my law review tenure, but I soon discovered their value as I struggled to develop my skills as a professional. Following are two examples. Example One. As a young lawyer, I quickly discovered that many attorneys, including those with great reservoirs of legal knowledge and years of experience, were lousy with clients. Some could not make any connection; their role was limited to serving the needs of their professional colleagues. Others, who I dubbed Recyclers, had mastered the challenge of making a strong first impression with clients, but overtime they would disappoint as the relationship never measured up to the expectations created up front. As a result, they were forever recycling clients just to keep their plates full. In contrast, I observed a few who knew how to build client relationships that continually strengthened overtime-who had, what I called, Escalating Credibility. …" @default.
• W331501571 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W331501571 creator A5047782887 @default.
• W331501571 date "2007-11-01" @default.
• W331501571 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W331501571 title "A Tribute to Richard O. Kummert" @default.
• W331501571 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W331501571 type Work @default.
• W331501571 sameAs 331501571 @default.
• W331501571 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W331501571 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W331501571 hasAuthorship W331501571A5047782887 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C2777038452 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C2777113389 @default.
• W331501571 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C144024400 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C144133560 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C15744967 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C162324750 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C162853370 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C169760540 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C17744445 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C187736073 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C199539241 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C2777038452 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C2777113389 @default.
• W331501571 hasConceptScore W331501571C2780378061 @default.
• W331501571 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W331501571 hasLocation W3315015711 @default.
• W331501571 hasOpenAccess W331501571 @default.
• W331501571 hasPrimaryLocation W3315015711 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W113441775 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W1990764405 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2026087410 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2071381227 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2075884766 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2085867087 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2091581139 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2150280048 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2154684383 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2167914158 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2172111579 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2331138910 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2331558991 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2333940825 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W238015916 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W3122925285 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W3178386765 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W335624936 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W9454445 @default.
• W331501571 hasRelatedWork W2771011944 @default.
• W331501571 hasVolume "82" @default.
• W331501571 isParatext "false" @default.
• W331501571 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W331501571 magId "331501571" @default.
• W331501571 workType "article" @default.