FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W334889319> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W334889319 startingPage "295" @default.
• W334889319 abstract "For some time now, programs for deaf children have been moving toward either adopting or adapting the general education curriculum of a particular school district. This has been a relatively straightforward process when the program for deaf children is a component of a local, county, or regional educational system. The usual approach is to use the existing general curriculum and then modify it to fit deaf children's special needs. The rationale is that many deaf children in such programs will spend significant parts of their educational lives in classes with students, and their academic integration should be as seamless as possible. This situation is somewhat different in residential or separate settings, but there is still a trend for use of a general curriculum. The goal is to upgrade academic offerings so that deaf students can compete on an equal basis with peers after completion of schooling. From my observation, many residential schools are showing impressive success in curriculum modification and improvement. The move toward a general curriculum has been influenced by the 1997 version of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which stresses the importance of using a general curriculum as a base to the greatest extent possible for children classified as disabled. Leaving aside-at least for this editorial-the very important question of whether it would be preferable to develop a curriculum from scratch taking into account the special characteristics of deaf children or whether we should begin with a hearing curriculum and adapt/adopt it, I would like to address developments in general curricula-especially among superstates or nation-states such as California, New York, Texas, and Florida, with particular emphasis on California. The United States has a tradition of local and state-not federal-control of education, with a resultant variation in curricular offerings. Thus, we can have a state such as Kansas recently deciding to downplay or eliminate the teaching of evolution in the public schools. In contrast to this is the extraordinarily mobility of the American population, which contributes to pressure for homogeneity of curricula in our schools. For example, 70 percent of the population of Florida were born in other states or countries. Parents want as little variety as possible in the schools their children may attend in different states. One reality is that our textbooks are developed to meet the needs of our largest states. Decisions on the teaching of evolution in Kansas have relatively (no pun intended) little impact on the rest of the country, but decisions made in California have tremendous implications, because the textbooks are geared to our largest states. …" @default.
• W334889319 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W334889319 creator A5080873288 @default.
• W334889319 date "1999-10-01" @default.
• W334889319 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W334889319 title "Idea and the 800 Pound Gorilla" @default.
• W334889319 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W334889319 type Work @default.
• W334889319 sameAs 334889319 @default.
• W334889319 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W334889319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W334889319 hasAuthorship W334889319A5080873288 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C154482161 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C2778120072 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C2779011557 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C28858896 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W334889319 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C138885662 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C144024400 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C145420912 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C154482161 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C15744967 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C19417346 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C2778120072 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C2779011557 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C28858896 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C41895202 @default.
• W334889319 hasConceptScore W334889319C47177190 @default.
• W334889319 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W334889319 hasLocation W3348893191 @default.
• W334889319 hasOpenAccess W334889319 @default.
• W334889319 hasPrimaryLocation W3348893191 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W154470097 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W1548396581 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W1966782524 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W1973424252 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W1997054879 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W2026019515 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W2082193853 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W221935546 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W2328816013 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W238741815 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W23972581 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W2575889054 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W258870370 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W271230097 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W276616986 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W32470918 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W32909543 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W751665080 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W774979487 @default.
• W334889319 hasRelatedWork W2619591417 @default.
• W334889319 hasVolume "144" @default.
• W334889319 isParatext "false" @default.
• W334889319 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W334889319 magId "334889319" @default.
• W334889319 workType "article" @default.