Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W338036779> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W338036779 abstract "Usability is one of the most important aspects of Information Technology. Usability plays a vital role in this industry, where organizations thrive to ensure utmost satisfaction of their end-users in regard to the experience of using their product. The systems may be a website or a software application. To measure user satisfaction, the method of usability testing can be performed. Performing usability testing gives a clear picture of difficulties that would be faced by potential target users. There are different types of usability testing such as Task-based usability testing, open ended usability testing, remote usability testing etc. The important point here is about deciding upon the most appropriate type of testing technique to get the accurate user satisfaction level.This study is mainly focused to answer the following research question: What is the relationship between the task-based and open ended usability testing, in terms of measuring satisfaction? System Usability Scale (SUS) has been used to measure the satisfaction of the users in this study. For this we used two websites performing task-based usability testing and open ended usability testing respectively.This study had involved twenty eight different participants. Participants are divided into two groups, one group to perform open ended usability testing and another for task-based usability testing for both the websites. This study has produced following results; Open-ended testing tended to produce higher SUS-ratings for the tested system. The results in this study showed that users performing open-ended usability testing gave positive responses for both the websites in terms of user satisfaction. Open-ended usability testing is an exploratory testing, where the testing is based on different aspects such as user interface of the system, design etc. Task-based usability testing is goal based where users have to complete the given task without fail. This method drew lower scores when compared to open-ended usability testing for the tested systems from the attained results. Nevertheless that task-based testing attained lower SUS scores, it is fairly straight forward than open-ended testing to measure efficiency and effectiveness. The above results have been discussed in detail. This study has finally concluded that to measure the usability of a system it is recommended to practice both the open-ended and task-based usability testing techniques." @default.
- W338036779 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W338036779 creator A5026199517 @default.
- W338036779 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W338036779 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W338036779 title "What is the relationship between task-based and open-ended usability testing, in terms of measuring satisfaction?" @default.
- W338036779 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W338036779 type Work @default.
- W338036779 sameAs 338036779 @default.
- W338036779 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W338036779 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W338036779 hasAuthorship W338036779A5026199517 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C100302975 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C11324603 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C139225968 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C23456302 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C4237393 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C62993174 @default.
- W338036779 hasConcept C87105883 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C100302975 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C107457646 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C11324603 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C127413603 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C136764020 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C139225968 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C170130773 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C201995342 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C23456302 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C2780451532 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C41008148 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C4237393 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C62993174 @default.
- W338036779 hasConceptScore W338036779C87105883 @default.
- W338036779 hasLocation W3380367791 @default.
- W338036779 hasOpenAccess W338036779 @default.
- W338036779 hasPrimaryLocation W3380367791 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W102657989 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W1131904624 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W1581674357 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W1971198216 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2016157817 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2043555414 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2087271627 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2121740115 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2132741456 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2134568599 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2137120039 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2159436866 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2346466814 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2398527329 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2470991599 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2558391362 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2600875006 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2918315460 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W2998691530 @default.
- W338036779 hasRelatedWork W3120645008 @default.
- W338036779 isParatext "false" @default.
- W338036779 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W338036779 magId "338036779" @default.
- W338036779 workType "article" @default.