FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W341517584> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W341517584 startingPage "9" @default.
• W341517584 abstract "In this Article, Professor Weiser argues that advent of cooperative federalism statutes, like Telecommunications of 1996, calls for a new conception of federal court review of state agency decisions. In particular, Professor Weiser suggests that federal statutes that invite state agencies to interpret federal law subject only to federal court review should be interpreted as calling for a deferential standard of review. Such a standard, to be sure, would allow cooperative federalism statutes to mean different things in different states. But as Professor Weiser illustrates with reference to Telecommunications Act, very nature of cooperative federalism statutes encourages states to implement and experiment with alternative regulatory models to meet local needs and desires. Moreover, underlying rationales of Chevron doctrine-which require a deferential standard of review of federal agency decisions-clearly militate in favor of deference to state agencies as well as federal ones. Nonetheless, highighting need to preserve uniform application of federal law, federal courts have concluded in theory that they will not defer to state agencies, while in practice they have consistently looked for ways to defer to state agency decisions. Thus, only by recognizing that uniformity in federal law reflects a goal and not an absolute mandate-and deferring to state agencies where Chevron recognizes that courts should not second-guess agency decisions-can federal courts facilitate emergence of cooperative federalism state and extricate themselves from highly technical policy issues that Chevron properly assigns to agencies. I. INTRODUCTION It remains a long-held principle of federal-state relations that federal courts are supreme over states in interpreting federal law. Over 180 years ago in Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, Justice Story decried suggestion that state court decisions concerning federal law could evade federal review, emphasizing that, [t]he public mischiefs that would attend such a state of things would be truly deplorable.1 In spirit of this dictum, federal courts have routinely rejected suggestion that they should defer to state agency interpretations of federal law.2 Such deference, argument goes, would destroy uniform interpretation and application of federal law.3 In this Article, I challenge this conventional view. The classic dictum in Marbury v. Madison calls for federal courts to have final say on what law is,4 yet they already defer to federal agencies under Chevron doctrine.5 In our contemporary age of cooperative federalism statutory schemes,6 basic principles that animate Chevron doctrine similarly call for deference by federal courts to state agencies. Moreover, such deference serves an important goal of cooperative federalism: it allows for and encourages state experimentation and interstate competition. In short, Chevron calls for an exception not only to Marbury dictum, but to Hunter's Lessee dictum as well. To illustrate my argument, I examine implementation of Telecommunications of 1996 (the Act or the Telecom Act),7 a recently enacted federal regulatory program that relies heavily on state agencies by inviting them to superintend-under federal statutory standards and subject to federal court review-the development of interconnection agreements between incumbent monopolists and new entrants into local telephone market.8 This examination demonstrates that federal courts are not well served by an intrusive standard of review of state agency decisions, and that, if not instructed to defer to state agency decisions in principle, they will nonetheless endeavor to do so in practice. To be sure, my argument anticipates that federal laws such as Telecom will not be applied uniformly across all fifty states. But complete uniformity in implementation of cooperative federalism statutes is both an undesirable and unattainable goal, as costs of intrusive judicial review are considerable, and there are important benefits that come from experimentation and interstate competition. …" @default.
• W341517584 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W341517584 creator A5086983215 @default.
• W341517584 date "1999-01-01" @default.
• W341517584 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W341517584 title "Chevron, Cooperative Federalism, and Telecommunications Reform" @default.
• W341517584 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W341517584 type Work @default.
• W341517584 sameAs 341517584 @default.
• W341517584 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W341517584 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W341517584 hasAuthorship W341517584A5086983215 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C129794794 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C156733173 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C2777006572 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C2779204856 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C2780216701 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C2780597233 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C533735693 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W341517584 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C108170787 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C11413529 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C129794794 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C144024400 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C151730666 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C156733173 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C158129432 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C162324750 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C17319257 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C17744445 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C190253527 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C199539241 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C2777006572 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C2777351106 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C2778272461 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C2779204856 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C2780216701 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C2780597233 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C36289849 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C41008148 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C48103436 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C533735693 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C86803240 @default.
• W341517584 hasConceptScore W341517584C94625758 @default.
• W341517584 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W341517584 hasLocation W3415175841 @default.
• W341517584 hasOpenAccess W341517584 @default.
• W341517584 hasPrimaryLocation W3415175841 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W115163607 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W1480908437 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W1546695450 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W1548044137 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W1778306113 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W2199206216 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W2238665797 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W2256213434 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W2274092661 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W284520908 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W309779605 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3123316665 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3123880789 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3124063882 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3124300966 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3124398964 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3124500931 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3125276731 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3154167793 @default.
• W341517584 hasRelatedWork W3124665506 @default.
• W341517584 hasVolume "52" @default.
• W341517584 isParatext "false" @default.
• W341517584 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W341517584 magId "341517584" @default.
• W341517584 workType "article" @default.