FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W342823311> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W342823311 startingPage "65" @default.
• W342823311 abstract "Executive Summary There are those who contend that we may be teaching the wrong things in the wrong way to students in colleges of business administration and management. If this is true, the cause may be a flaw in the pedagogy that drives management education for traditional students. Research in the sciences describes systems theory as a holistic paradigm that may be used as a foundation to be applied in the areas of learning processes and managerial practice. In this article, the author posits a model to describe a learning process that may be applied to the education of business students in academic courses related to the of management in organizations. The premise of the model is found in the academic disciplines of science and philosophy as they relate to management and learning theories. The author concludes the article with examples to support the application of the model in practical settings. It would seem impossible for an individual to graduate from a college of business administration without being fluent in the lexicon of management, inclusive of the latest buzzwords and nouveau paradigms. However, more than one business executive has anecdotally noted that some of these new grads lack the ability to what they have been taught to preach. The impetus for this article is partially based on the contention of noted management research scholar, Henry Mintzberg (2002), who suggests that we may be teaching the wrong things to the wrong people in the wrong way on a global level. In a recent meeting at the Academy of Management Annual Conference in Denver, Mintzberg shared this viewpoint with professors in an appeal to re-think the way management is taught to business school students. This concept is reinforced in the current literature (Mintzberg & Gosling, 2002). Since educators in other professional programs (health care and public administration, for instance) possess the responsibility of teaching management practices as part of the overall curriculum, these comments have implications for them, as well. While business professors provide instruction in management aimed at in general commerce, other professions-based educators profess these same concepts in an industry-applied manner (Tesone, 2000). Mintzberg's contention seems to support the belief that management is not an independent academic discipline, but instead a professional practice based on theories derived from the disciplines of science and philosophy (Tesone, 2001). A comparison could be rendered from the field of medicine, in which the physician has been described as a practicing technician of pre-ordained scientific findings in the areas of biophysics and biochemistry (Zukav, 1979). Just as the physician hones a from applications learned in residency, the manager attains proficiency from trial-and-error applications as a professional practitioner. Mintzberg, a self-professed scholarly renegade, most recently suggests that professors implement experientially based approaches to develop knowledge and skills in the of management. He identifies ongoing collaborative learning projects in Europe, in which he is currently engaged to provide examples of this approach, which he suggests is a radical departure from the more traditional Harvard Business School pedagogy (2002). Mintzberg, who hails from McGill University in Canada, implies that this approach to teaching managerial skills is appropriate for institutions on a global level, which leads the author of this article to further articulate the application of his premise. In this article, the author posits a model to describe a learning process that may be applied to the education of business students in academic courses related to the of management in organizations. The premise of the model is found in the academic disciplines of science and philosophy as they relate to management and learning theories. The author concludes the article with examples to support the application of the model in practical settings. …" @default.
• W342823311 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W342823311 creator A5014728829 @default.
• W342823311 date "2003-04-01" @default.
• W342823311 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W342823311 title "New Business Graduates Can Talk the Talk: But Can They Walk the Management Walk?" @default.
• W342823311 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W342823311 type Work @default.
• W342823311 sameAs 342823311 @default.
• W342823311 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W342823311 countsByYear W3428233112013 @default.
• W342823311 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W342823311 hasAuthorship W342823311A5014728829 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C2778023277 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C521423885 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C523056402 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W342823311 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C111472728 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C111919701 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C120912362 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C127413603 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C138885662 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C144024400 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C15744967 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C17744445 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C19417346 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C199539241 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C2778023277 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C39549134 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C41008148 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C521423885 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C523056402 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C55587333 @default.
• W342823311 hasConceptScore W342823311C98045186 @default.
• W342823311 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W342823311 hasLocation W3428233111 @default.
• W342823311 hasOpenAccess W342823311 @default.
• W342823311 hasPrimaryLocation W3428233111 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W13394884 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W139538134 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W1550752032 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W1560973285 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W1602514347 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W173888128 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W1857925795 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W1991234768 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2013914484 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2075884049 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2163799609 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2253679342 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W247199129 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2515028790 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2784273480 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2966267233 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W591070239 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W759287319 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W1584660745 @default.
• W342823311 hasRelatedWork W2181531421 @default.
• W342823311 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W342823311 isParatext "false" @default.
• W342823311 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W342823311 magId "342823311" @default.
• W342823311 workType "article" @default.