FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W343302502> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W343302502 startingPage "913" @default.
• W343302502 abstract "I. WHY IS THE COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW INDISPENSIBLE? II. BACKGROUND A. Why is the Supreme Court Historically Allowed to Use Transnational Law in Its Decisions? B. How has the Supreme Court Used Transnational Law in the Past? C. The Supreme Court's Current Practice: Transnational Discourse III. THE ADVANTAGES, CRITICISMS, AND METHODS, OF THE SUPREME COURT'S CURRENT APPROACHES TO TRANSNATIONAL DISCOURSE A. Arguments for the Court's Transnational Discourse 1. Furthers Global Dynamism in Constitutional Interpretation 2. Advances Global Development of the Law 3. Leads to Judicial Innovation and Dispels False Necessity for Courts and Lawyers B. Objections to Transnational Discourse 1. Lack of Expertise in Using Transnational Law. 2. Misuses of International Law C. Considerations of Comparative Methodology 1. Originalism, or Noncomparativist Interpretative Perspective 2. Modern Functionalist Methods 3. The Dialogical Perspective 4. Genealogical Comparativism, or Ahistorical Comparativism IV. RECOMMENDATAIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF TRANSNATIONAL DIALOGUE A. Increased Education and Awareness of Transnational Comparative Law B. Engage in More Discourse with Foreign Countries. C. Encourage Transparency in Opinions D. Always Use Transnational Sources in Constitutional Interpretation with Restraint and Due Consideration V. CONCLUSION To ascertain that which is unwritten, we resort to the great principles of reason and justice: but, as these principles will be differently understood by different nations under different circumstances, we consider them as being, in some degree, fixed and rendered stable by a series of judicial decisions. The decisions of the Courts of every country, so far as they are founded upon a law common to every country, will be received, not as authority, but with respect. (1) I. WHY IS THE COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW INDISPENSIBLE? comparative constitutional law, (2) as in life, lilt is always wise to look ahead, but difficult to look farther than you can see. (3) Common sense dictates that when facing a difficult problem, one must research solutions. ordinary life, a person might speak with his coworkers, friends, or an experienced individual with wisdom to share. Likewise, when engaged with a difficult constitutional issue, the Supreme Court should, and frequently does, look first to American (4) and then to Anglo-law (5) for solutions. But what if initial efforts yield no solution to our protagonist's intractable problem, and similarly, the Supreme Court finds no answers in domestic law? He must then look to outside, experienced sources for answers, as the Supreme Court has done increasingly in recent years. (6) recent cases, the Supreme Court has made significant inroads in recognizing the value of and drawing assistance from legal developments around the world. (7) Also increasing is cross-pollination and dialogue between [national] jurisdictions,(8) which results from foreign and international sources being treated as transnational law (9) that transcend[s] [n]ational frontiers. (10) Can law truly transcend boundaries and should it? It has famously been written that despite relevant political differences, other countries' experience may nonetheless cast an empirical light on the consequences of different solutions to a common legal problem. (11) Several Justices take a similar position. (12) Yet, some Justices criticize this practice as contravening American views. (13) Fundamentally the issue is: In what circumstances, if any, should the United States Supreme Court cite a decision by an international or other foreign court? (14) Throughout its history, the Supreme Court has used nondomestic court decisions, international law, and customary international law in interpreting difficult constitutional issues. …" @default.
• W343302502 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W343302502 creator A5038704258 @default.
• W343302502 date "2006-03-22" @default.
• W343302502 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W343302502 title "Looking at the Constitution through World-Colored Glasses: The Supreme Court's Use of Transnational Law in Constitutional Adjudication" @default.
• W343302502 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W343302502 type Work @default.
• W343302502 sameAs 343302502 @default.
• W343302502 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W343302502 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W343302502 hasAuthorship W343302502A5038704258 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C110346835 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W343302502 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C110346835 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C144024400 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C149209484 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C170706310 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C17744445 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C199539241 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C2776154427 @default.
• W343302502 hasConceptScore W343302502C2778272461 @default.
• W343302502 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W343302502 hasLocation W3433025021 @default.
• W343302502 hasOpenAccess W343302502 @default.
• W343302502 hasPrimaryLocation W3433025021 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W1519645747 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W1528166470 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W1529307744 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W1616620563 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W2045829468 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W2269799607 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W227210910 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W2318379533 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W2342928235 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W2519012606 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W2912701870 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W3121873007 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W3123910018 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W3124541260 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W3170262802 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W392813139 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W82914394 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W1500976609 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W3124396088 @default.
• W343302502 hasRelatedWork W3145500831 @default.
• W343302502 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W343302502 isParatext "false" @default.
• W343302502 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W343302502 magId "343302502" @default.
• W343302502 workType "article" @default.