FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W345097316> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W345097316 endingPage "29" @default.
• W345097316 startingPage "22" @default.
• W345097316 abstract "Educational Technology for Evidence-Based Practice (LET-EBP), a four year federally funded project, was designed to extend use of educational technologies in the prelicensure undergraduate nursing program of a large public research university. Faculty members supported through the project developed and integrated over 20 technology-based modules into the nursing curriculum. Post-hoc program evaluation was guided by the RE-AIM framework. Faculty members reported learning general aspects of instructional design and best teaching practices through the process of integrating new educational technology; 81% of the undergraduate nursing faculty participated in some aspect of the program.Assisting clinical professionals to develop as effective teachers during an era of rapid change in educational technology is challenging. Many nursing faculty are novice teachers without benefit of formal teaching preparation; even experienced teachers may find integrating educational technology to be daunting. Healthcare clinical educators are expected to maintain specialty and healthcare technology expertise while learning how to integrate educational technologies (i.e., learning management systems, content authoring software, student response devices, and highfidelity human patient simulation) into teaching practice. However, unless teachers employ educational technologies effectively, learners are not likely to derive much benefit from their use (U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1995).National efforts to graduate more nurses, intended to alleviate current and predicted nursing shortages, have intensified the shortage of qualified nursing faculty (American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN], 2012). Challenges in obtaining sufficient clinical learning sites for the growing number of nursing students are offset in some programs by the use of human patient simulation experiences to replace or enhance less effective or unavailable clinical experiences. Implementing the effective use of such a complex learning technology is an enormous undertaking.Developing faculty expertise in use of a variety of educational technologies is essential to the transformation of nursing education as recommended by the Carnegie Foundation (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard & Day, 2009). In a context of challenge and opportunity, a group of faculty and staff leaders from a nursing college within a very large urban multi-campus research university committed to a goal: overtly change the undergraduate nursing faculty culture from one of relative technology avoidance to active technology adoption, while covertly enhancing faculty members' general teaching and instructional design skills.In 2008, the college was home to approximately 140 full or part-time faculty, 500 undergraduate students, and 300 graduate students. A college-based team was determined to work patiently toward the goal of active technology adoption with only the currently available resources, but it was clear that additional resources might significantly speed up the progress and increase the impact of the project. Three funding novices set out to secure federal support; the second version of the proposal was funded as a DHHS/HRSA/BHPr/Division of Nursing four year project, Leveraging Educational Technology for Evidence-Based Practice (LET-EBP).LET-EBP team members embraced the challenge of changing the technology culture through work with four groups of participants: undergraduate nursing students, clinical nurse preceptors, multidisciplinary practice partners, and nursing faculty. Over the 4 years of the project, more than 1400 undergraduate pre-licensure students benefited directly from the expanded learning opportunities. Other participant groups included clinical nurse preceptors (160) guiding student clinical experiences in healthcare agencies, and multidisciplinary partners with collaborative health education and patient safety initiatives. …" @default.
• W345097316 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W345097316 creator A5017390030 @default.
• W345097316 creator A5027715885 @default.
• W345097316 creator A5042637629 @default.
• W345097316 creator A5049464366 @default.
• W345097316 creator A5063342317 @default.
• W345097316 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W345097316 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W345097316 title "Leveraging the Technology du Jour for Overt and Covert Faculty Development." @default.
• W345097316 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W345097316 type Work @default.
• W345097316 sameAs 345097316 @default.
• W345097316 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W345097316 countsByYear W3450973162016 @default.
• W345097316 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W345097316 hasAuthorship W345097316A5017390030 @default.
• W345097316 hasAuthorship W345097316A5027715885 @default.
• W345097316 hasAuthorship W345097316A5042637629 @default.
• W345097316 hasAuthorship W345097316A5049464366 @default.
• W345097316 hasAuthorship W345097316A5063342317 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C113616995 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C16443162 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C2776893095 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C2778396470 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C51067260 @default.
• W345097316 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C113616995 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C15744967 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C159110408 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C160735492 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C16443162 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C17744445 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C19417346 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C199539241 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C2776893095 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C2778396470 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C47177190 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C509550671 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C51067260 @default.
• W345097316 hasConceptScore W345097316C71924100 @default.
• W345097316 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W345097316 hasLocation W3450973161 @default.
• W345097316 hasOpenAccess W345097316 @default.
• W345097316 hasPrimaryLocation W3450973161 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W112576870 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W1551716421 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W1987552861 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W1994729596 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2002233578 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2021922149 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2037334652 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2037515744 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2051759115 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2058460135 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2099271191 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2123976539 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2143931054 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2144014138 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2205976283 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2412481966 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W25183178 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W2997714156 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W3158871627 @default.
• W345097316 hasRelatedWork W3186575844 @default.
• W345097316 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W345097316 isParatext "false" @default.
• W345097316 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W345097316 magId "345097316" @default.
• W345097316 workType "article" @default.