FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W346551996> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W346551996 startingPage "519" @default.
• W346551996 abstract "INTRODUCTION I. THE LAW GOVERNING ABORTION A. The Right of Privacy B. The Right to Abortion 1. Roe v. Wade 2. The Reaction to Roe 3. Refining Roe 4. Analyzing Post-Roe Cases 5. Planned Parenthood v. Casey 6. Critiquing Casey II. THE BATTLE OVER PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION A. Stenberg v. Carhart 1. The Court's Decision 2. The Reaction to Stenberg B. The Congressional Ban on Partial-Birth Abortion 1. The Statute 2. Gonzales v. Carhart 3. An Analysis of Gonzales III. THE CONVERGENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND POLITICS A. The Common Law of Constitution B. A Critique of Modern Constitutional Decision Making CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION Gonzales v. Carhart (1) continues Supreme Court's haphazard development of its abortion jurisprudence--and neatly illustrates everything that has gone awry in modern constitutional law. Justice Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, concluded that federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 (PBABA) (2) did not, on its face, unduly burden a woman's constitutional right to obtain an abortion. (3) Justices Thomas and Scalia would have upheld statute simply because the Court's abortion jurisprudence ... has no basis in Constitution. (4) Justice Ginsburg and three other dissenters argued that PBABA was indistinguishable from a state law that previously had struck down in Stenberg v. Carhart. (5) Meanwhile, all of Justices simply assumed Congress had power to enact challenged legislation. (6) Gonzales followed a familiar pattern. Despite new Chief Justice's professed desire to avoid splintered decisions, (7) divided into moderate, conservative, and liberal camps-just as it has done with other contentious issues such as school integration, free speech, and due process rights of enemy combatants. (8) As usual, Justices applied a murky common law to reach results that tracked their ideological views. (9) Finally, once again increased its own power and that of Congress. (10) Gonzales exemplifies modern disintegration of ideal of the Court expounding the Constitution--i.e., its language read in light of its underlying political structure and theory, its drafting and ratification history, and understandings manifested by those who implemented its provisions for over a century. Rather, individual Justices have employed an eccentric version of common law. (11) In Anglo-American system, legislatures make rules expressing their constituents' preferred policies, but sometimes delegate this power in certain areas (e.g., property, contracts, and torts) to courts, which gradually develop law on a case-by-case basis. (12) Stare decisis commands judges to follow established precedent absent compelling reasons for departure-most pertinently, concerns that a rule has become unacceptable in light of changed social conditions. (13) Moreover, common law is subject to legislative override. (14) This traditional, and restrained, model of adjudication has not been faithfully applied in contemporary constitutional adjudication. Most notably, constitutional law has been marked by abrupt shifts, not incremental doctrinal tinkering. For instance, in 1937, suddenly abandoned a century-and-a-half of case law imposing limits on Congress and instead interpreted Article I as conferring virtually untrammeled legislative power. (15) This turnaround reflected five Justices' perception of sound governmental and economic policy during Depression. (16) President Roosevelt solidified this jurisprudence by appointing Justices based primarily on their political commitment to New Deal, not on judicial experience or legal acumen. (17) A generation later, Warren dismantled most precedent concerning individual rights and reinterpreted Constitution to implement ideas about liberty and equality that incorporated progressive social and moral views. …" @default.
• W346551996 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W346551996 creator A5043986397 @default.
• W346551996 date "2008-03-22" @default.
• W346551996 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W346551996 title "Partial-Birth Abortion and the Perils of Constitutional Common Law" @default.
• W346551996 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W346551996 type Work @default.
• W346551996 sameAs 346551996 @default.
• W346551996 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W346551996 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W346551996 hasAuthorship W346551996A5043986397 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C18650270 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2781360127 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W346551996 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C144024400 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C149923435 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C170706310 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C17319257 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C17744445 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C18650270 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C199539241 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2776154427 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2777351106 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2778272461 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2778642596 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2779076696 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2779234561 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2781360127 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2908647359 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C2986817661 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C54355233 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C71043370 @default.
• W346551996 hasConceptScore W346551996C86803240 @default.
• W346551996 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W346551996 hasLocation W3465519961 @default.
• W346551996 hasOpenAccess W346551996 @default.
• W346551996 hasPrimaryLocation W3465519961 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W1538566917 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W1583212034 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W1592051809 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W1998199625 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W2229996339 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W246423382 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W2499220001 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W2736049051 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W2754112461 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W2807395906 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W310233856 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W3125838440 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W3174362437 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W332090567 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W336094318 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W348766822 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W349740982 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W42965688 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W3123171444 @default.
• W346551996 hasRelatedWork W3125351379 @default.
• W346551996 hasVolume "31" @default.
• W346551996 isParatext "false" @default.
• W346551996 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W346551996 magId "346551996" @default.
• W346551996 workType "article" @default.