Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W346606735> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W346606735 startingPage "57" @default.
- W346606735 abstract "The federal criminal code--to the extent one can call the United States' sprawling and disorganized mass of criminal legislation and regulations a code--is a disgrace. In particular, the United States has overcriminalized and overfederalized in the realm of criminal law. (1) A recent article by Susan Klein and Ingrid Grobey in the Emory Law Journal argues that is not a problem. (2) This Essay attempts first to present the material facts about which both sides of the debate agree. Then, it explains the basis of my fundamental disagreement with those who believe the overfederalization claim is overblown. Fact 1: No definitive count of federal crimes is extant, and such a count is probably not possible without too much work to make the task worthwhile. Even Professors Klein and Grobey deem a definitive count an impossible task. (3) The latest count is 4,000 criminal statutes, (4) but no one actually knows how many criminal prohibitions exist, in part because Congress regularly delegates to federal agencies the authority to promulgate regulations implementing legislation. (5) Congress often prospectively provides that when agencies finally issue the regulations, they can be enforced criminally. (6) Some estimate that federal agencies have generated hundreds of thousands of criminally-enforceable regulations. (7) Fact 2: The undeniable trend is towards even more criminal legislation and criminally-enforceable regulations. Thus, one ABA Task Force determined that [m]ore than 40% of the federal criminal provisions enacted since the Civil War have been enacted since 1970. (8) A report published by the Federalist Society noted that the explosive growth in federal crimes has continued unabated since the ABA Report. I concluded that the number of statutory provisions susceptible to criminal enforcement increased by one-third between 1980 and 2004. (9) Fact 3: Those who argue that is not a problem point out that, despite the ever-increasing federal criminal code, the allocation of federal and state law enforcement has been stable for quite some time. (10) Between two and five percent of all criminal cases are federal, and between ninety-five and ninety-eight percent are state, a statistic that has been fairly constant. (11) It should be noted, however, that the absolute number of state and federal cases has increased. As Professors Klein and Grobey document, [t]he number of federal criminal prosecutions has grown steadily, with little fluctuation, since 1980, at a rate of about 1,500 additional cases per year. (12) Thus, the number of federal criminal filings more than doubled from 1964 through 2011 despite a significant overall decline in crime rates. Fact 4: Resource constraints mean the federal government can only bring a limited number of cases, no matter the breadth of the code. (13) Professors Klein and Grobey rightly point out that about eighty percent of all federal cases fall into just four offense categories: drugs, immigration, guns, and fraud. (14) Of course, this means that twenty percent of federal resources are being devoted to other areas. Fact 5: The number of regulatory violations pursued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) has declined from seven percent of the federal docket in 1980 to two percent in 2011. (15) In real numbers, this was a decrease from 2,925 cases in 1980 to 2,171 in 2011. (16) In reliance on these facts, those who argue that over-federalization concerns are exaggerated contend first that the overabundance of federal legislation is not a problem because prosecutors ignore the overwhelming majority of these statutes. (17) Federal prosecutors can bring only a small number of cases; by overwhelmingly focusing on four categories of federal charging priorities, they have left the federal-state balance unaltered. (18) Second, where there are concededly problems with the code--such as the vagueness of many provisions and the disturbingly low mens rea requirements, particularly in the regulatory crimes area--the judiciary can correct them. …" @default.
- W346606735 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W346606735 creator A5028809441 @default.
- W346606735 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W346606735 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W346606735 title "The Federal Criminal Code: Return of Overfederalization" @default.
- W346606735 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W346606735 type Work @default.
- W346606735 sameAs 346606735 @default.
- W346606735 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W346606735 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W346606735 hasAuthorship W346606735A5028809441 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C2777006572 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C2778757428 @default.
- W346606735 hasConcept C2781394664 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C17319257 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C17744445 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C199539241 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C202565627 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C2777006572 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C2777351106 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C2778757428 @default.
- W346606735 hasConceptScore W346606735C2781394664 @default.
- W346606735 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W346606735 hasLocation W3466067351 @default.
- W346606735 hasOpenAccess W346606735 @default.
- W346606735 hasPrimaryLocation W3466067351 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W152367765 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W1555454259 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W1572428341 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W1585617792 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W161028722 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W1979293087 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W2006185222 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W244854513 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W2528939240 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W277636274 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W2986217036 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W298786681 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W3122274110 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W3126060243 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W3134774030 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W3146650419 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W52282308 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W622180097 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W2752173316 @default.
- W346606735 hasRelatedWork W3122956165 @default.
- W346606735 hasVolume "37" @default.
- W346606735 isParatext "false" @default.
- W346606735 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W346606735 magId "346606735" @default.
- W346606735 workType "article" @default.