FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W346638452> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W346638452 startingPage "68" @default.
• W346638452 abstract "In a case on appeal before the Sixth Circuit, household consumer goods manufacturer Procter & Gamble (P&G) and a related entity claim a refund of taxes paid on a foreign sales corporation (FSC) advance payment transaction (APT). The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio had denied the claim by P&G and P&G FSC, which is based on a chimed deduction of more than $362 million for tax year 2000. P&G, P&G Canada, and P&G FSC are related entities but file separate tax returns. During tax year 2000, P&G Canada made a $374,790,000 advance payment to P&G FSC. P&G FSC, in turn, made a $288,588,300 advance payment and an interest-free loan of the difference--$86,201,700--to P&G. P&G FSC reported sales income of $374,790,000 attributable to the APT, while P&G reported only $288,588,300 (the transfer price) in sales income on its tax return. The manufacturing cost of the products subject to the APT was $359,344,974. P&G and P&G FSC calculated combined taxable income (CTI) by adding P&G FSCg gross receipts for the APT and not subtracting any of the $359,344,974, on the rationale that the costs were not incurred until tax year 2001. P&G reported these costs as cost of goods sold on its 2001 tax return. P&G also reported a net loss of $70,756,674 on its 2000 and 2001 tax returns in connection with the APT. The essence of the transactions was to allow the taxpayers to shift the difference between the gross receipts and the transfer price to P&G FSC, which P&G FSC reported as a profit. Under the now-repealed FSC rules, the taxpayers were allowed to exempt 23% of their CTI permanently from tax under IRC [section][section] 921 and 923. The amount excluded equaled the profit reported by P&G FSC. During its audit, the IRS determined that the transfer price was based on a CTI calculation that did not include total costs, thereby violating the FSC administrative pricing rules and resulting in an understatement of P&G income of $86,201,700. The IRS assessed P&G for the understatement. P&G paid the assessment and sought a refund of the taxes at the administrative level. When the claim was denied, the taxpayers sought judicial review under IRC [section] 7422. In a 2007 opinion, the district court found that because of the huge disparity between the arm's-length price of $374,790,000 and the transfer price of $288,588,300, as a matter of law, the prices could not be viewed as an approximation of each other. The court concluded that the transfer price ran counter to legislative intent, which was to limit the FSC exemption to an approximation of an arm's-length price in compliance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The court ruled that the taxpayers' calculation of CTI violated the FSC administrative pricing rules. …" @default.
• W346638452 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W346638452 creator A5086361287 @default.
• W346638452 date "2009-04-01" @default.
• W346638452 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W346638452 title "P&G Appeals Deduction Denial" @default.
• W346638452 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W346638452 type Work @default.
• W346638452 sameAs 346638452 @default.
• W346638452 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W346638452 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W346638452 hasAuthorship W346638452A5086361287 @default.
• W346638452 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W346638452 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W346638452 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W346638452 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W346638452 hasConcept C157263771 @default.
• W346638452 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W346638452 hasConceptScore W346638452C10138342 @default.
• W346638452 hasConceptScore W346638452C121955636 @default.
• W346638452 hasConceptScore W346638452C144133560 @default.
• W346638452 hasConceptScore W346638452C145097563 @default.
• W346638452 hasConceptScore W346638452C157263771 @default.
• W346638452 hasConceptScore W346638452C162324750 @default.
• W346638452 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W346638452 hasLocation W3466384521 @default.
• W346638452 hasOpenAccess W346638452 @default.
• W346638452 hasPrimaryLocation W3466384521 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W109765977 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W1139276452 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W1481391553 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W1525079459 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W1555116842 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W194282336 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2073911371 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2117779614 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2202721109 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W270018509 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2884511056 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2994267466 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W320520284 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W327630054 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2315061553 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2840769043 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W2917841106 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W3012131013 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W3135535349 @default.
• W346638452 hasRelatedWork W984983020 @default.
• W346638452 hasVolume "207" @default.
• W346638452 isParatext "false" @default.
• W346638452 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W346638452 magId "346638452" @default.
• W346638452 workType "article" @default.