FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W34960079> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W34960079 abstract "In the past two decades, newsrooms around the world have undergone significant changes in photographic and image processing techniques. Traditional photojournalism tools of analogue cameras, film, darkrooms and chemicals have given way to digital cameras, scanners, computers, the internet and electronic archiving. Some hail this change a sign of evolution in the science and art of photography, while others warn of a revolution with serious consequences for the credibility of photographs in general, and for photojournalism ethics in particular. This study of 12 daily newspapers in Australia, Britain, France and the United States examines the impact of these developments on photojournalism ethics domestically and cross-culturally. The philosophic concept of truth in journalism is traced historically, before focusing specifically on the ideal of veracity in news photography. A written survey and oral questionnaire are used to provide evidence of tolerance for image retouching and manipulation techniques at different organisational levels in each newsroom. These results are used to explore the ethical questions at the heart of the debate on digital imaging and to help define future challenges in photojournalism. This study shows few differences in attitudes to photojournalism ethics within Australian newspaper types or organisations, with so-called quality newspapers no more likely than popular newspapers to provide guidance or training in photojournalism ethics relating to digital technology. The only notable area of divergence is the level of confidence in ethical standards and the photographer's control over the final published image, which was found to be greater at quality newspapers than at popular ones. However, more substantial differences emerged in cross-cultural comparisons of attitudes to ethics, with American photographers least likely, and British photographers most likely, to approve of the study's defined manipulation practices. As a general rule, Australian photographers' approval rates were around mid-way between these extremes, but attitudes at French newspapers were more difficult to quantify for a variety of reasons. Participation in professional training programs in photojournalism ethics was extremely limited in all countries, except in the United States. Furthermore, while there was evidence of substantial intra-organisational differences in attitudes to ethics between managerial layers in Australia and Britain, these were far less marked in the United States and France. The research ends by outlining some resulting professional developmental challenges and advocating an overhaul of previous approaches to photojournalism ethics." @default.
• W34960079 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W34960079 creator A5060993107 @default.
• W34960079 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W34960079 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W34960079 title "Truth and the photojournalist : the ethical issues at the heart of the debate on digital images" @default.
• W34960079 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W34960079 type Work @default.
• W34960079 sameAs 34960079 @default.
• W34960079 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W34960079 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W34960079 hasAuthorship W34960079A5060993107 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C119513131 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C119657128 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C201280247 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W34960079 hasConcept C9529602 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C119513131 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C119657128 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C142362112 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C144024400 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C153349607 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C17744445 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C199539241 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C201280247 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C2780224610 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C29595303 @default.
• W34960079 hasConceptScore W34960079C9529602 @default.
• W34960079 hasLocation W349600791 @default.
• W34960079 hasOpenAccess W34960079 @default.
• W34960079 hasPrimaryLocation W349600791 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W113328842 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W1590876226 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W1600711208 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W1605937257 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W16292888 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2013215622 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2024726227 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2040363145 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2299454394 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2322611606 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2325986170 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2419316557 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2889224140 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2905463660 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W2977107684 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W3126823180 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W3165419965 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W3201060627 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W365251188 @default.
• W34960079 hasRelatedWork W3121102792 @default.
• W34960079 isParatext "false" @default.
• W34960079 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W34960079 magId "34960079" @default.
• W34960079 workType "article" @default.