FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W349877208> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W349877208 startingPage "319" @default.
• W349877208 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION For a number of years this nation was immersed in a Patriot Act1 frenzy driven by conservative and liberal politicians, media, and special interest groups. The frenzy was characterized by sound bites and headlines intended to have an impact on public but which, unfortunately, often did not illuminate facts or actual law enacted by Patriot Act. Politicians and pundits were quick to label Act as either good for America and necessary for national security, or as an unconstitutional infringement on civil liberties,2 consistendy failing to reference or accurately describe exact provisions diat supported their conclusions.3 All of this, of course, took place in a highly charged atmosphere in which very names Patriot, Ashcroft, Gonzales, and Bush brought forth images of right-wing ideologies bent on violating civil liberties to protect national security or increase their personal and partisan control over government. This context, when added to general ignorance of served to dramatically enhance emotion and confusion that dominated debate. It is thus not surprising that one frequendy encounters both citizens and lawyers who sincerely question the Patriot Act, but, when asked which sections bother them most, often refer to completely unrelated components of administration's war on terror. It has been common, for example, to hear complaints that it is improper for Patriot Act to allow government monitoring of communications between an attorney and client. This procedure, however, stems from a 2001 order from Attorney General to Bureau of Prisons entided Monitoring of Attorney-Client Communications of Designated Federal Prisoners,4 is based on a Supreme Court case,5 and is utilized only when parties have been advised that their communications are subject to being monitored.6 Regardless of advisability of order, it is not connected with Patriot Act. Citizens have also responded with references to potential trial of terrorist suspects before military tribunals. These proceedings, however, are based on a 2001 presidential order entided Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain NonCitizens in War against Terrorism,7 which in turn relies upon a number of Supreme Court cases,8 and, again, have no connection to Patriot Act. Perhaps of greater concern, as will be detailed at length in this article, is fact that when those who raised serious questions managed to refer to legal concepts that actually are in Patriot such as sneak and peak warrants, searching of business and computer records, or Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA),9 their characterizations of statute's provisions, relying as they did on political, media, and special interest sources, was in many cases extremely wide of mark.10 During last two years we have finally witnessed submission of well-formulated legal challenges to Patriot Act's actual provisions in courts and before Congress. These challenges have resulted in initial legal opinions by lower courts as well as amendments to Act itself in USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reaudiorization Act of 2005 (PIRA)11 and USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (Patriot Amendments Act).12 Now, tiierefore, is a perfect time to step back and accurately examine most controversial provisions of Act and review what, if anything, has been done to modify those provisions. II. PROVISIONS DESIGNED TO INCREASE COMMUNICATION WITHIN GOVERNMENT During aftermath of September 11th, commentators and politicians proclaimed that reason for success of attacks was because Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), whose focus is law enforcement, and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), whose focus is intelligence, did not communicate with each other.13 If they had communicated, according to these critics, they certainly would have been able to connect dots that stood out in isolated pieces of information known to some government agents but apparently not collected and understood by analysts in one central office. …" @default.
• W349877208 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W349877208 creator A5088232994 @default.
• W349877208 date "2007-04-01" @default.
• W349877208 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W349877208 title "Patriot 2005-2007: Truth, Controversy, and Consequences" @default.
• W349877208 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W349877208 type Work @default.
• W349877208 sameAs 349877208 @default.
• W349877208 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W349877208 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W349877208 hasAuthorship W349877208A5088232994 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C203133693 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C2775923278 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C2778732403 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C2778886770 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C528167355 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W349877208 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C138885662 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C144024400 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C158071213 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C166957645 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C17744445 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C199539241 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C203133693 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C2775923278 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C2778137410 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C2778732403 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C2778886770 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C2779343474 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C41895202 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C528167355 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C94625758 @default.
• W349877208 hasConceptScore W349877208C95457728 @default.
• W349877208 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W349877208 hasLocation W3498772081 @default.
• W349877208 hasOpenAccess W349877208 @default.
• W349877208 hasPrimaryLocation W3498772081 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W2059335570 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W2115902865 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W2215628212 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W2223448268 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W226295541 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W2267796525 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W2496035232 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W252618885 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W2884508094 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W3122126054 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W3124805197 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W3125020679 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W332993420 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W344135055 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W410052957 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W61692685 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W656075699 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W803662267 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W836103467 @default.
• W349877208 hasRelatedWork W3125764238 @default.
• W349877208 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W349877208 isParatext "false" @default.
• W349877208 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W349877208 magId "349877208" @default.
• W349877208 workType "article" @default.