FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W35808879> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W35808879 abstract "Conventional Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is usually conducted at a point in time at which the development of the respective technology may no longer be influenced. By this time developers and/or purchasers may have misinvested resources. Thus the demand for Technology Assessment (TA) which incorporates appropriate methods during early development stages of a technology becomes apparent. Against this health political background, the present report describes methods for a development-accompanying assessment of innovative medical technologies. Furthermore, international research programmes set out to identify or apply such methods will be outlined. A systematic literature search as well as an extensive manual literature search are carried out in order to obtain literature and information. The greatest units of the identified methods consist of assessment concepts, decision support methods, modelling approaches and methods focusing on users and their knowledge. Additionally, several general-purpose concepts have been identified. The identified research programmes INNO-HTA and MATCH (Multidisciplinary-Assessment-of-Technology-Centre-for-Healthcare) are to be seen as pilot projects which so far have not been able to generate final results. MATCH focuses almost entirely on the incorporation of the user-perspective regarding the development of non-pharmaceutical technologies, whereas INNO-HTA is basically concerned with the identification and possible advancement of methods for the early, socially-oriented technology assessment. Most references offer only very vague descriptions of the respective method and the application of greatly differing methods seldom exceeds the character of a pilot implementation. A standardisation much less an institutionalisation of development-accompanying assessment cannot be recognized. It must be noted that there is no singular method with which development-accompanying assessment should be carried out. Instead, a technology and evaluation specific method selection seem to be necessary as medical innovations are diverse and none of the methods are exhaustive. Because of a variety of issues (e. g. ideal time of evaluation, lack of data and uncertainty of data) a development-accompanying assessment should not replace a comprehensive HTA, but rather form a possible preceding step in a multi-staged HTA-process. A final appraisal of the methods for development-accompanying assessment cannot be made based on the available sources. However, the present review may serve as a starting point for further development and application of these methods as well as further examination of the concept of development-accompanying assessment. There is a substantial need for further research concerning the application, validation and comparison of the various methods for development-accompanying assessment." @default.
• W35808879 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W35808879 creator A5013905523 @default.
• W35808879 creator A5017525008 @default.
• W35808879 creator A5017973419 @default.
• W35808879 creator A5038449198 @default.
• W35808879 creator A5069181970 @default.
• W35808879 date "2009-11-05" @default.
• W35808879 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W35808879 title "Methods for assessment of innovative medical technologies during early stages of development." @default.
• W35808879 doi "https://doi.org/10.3205/hta000077" @default.
• W35808879 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3011288" @default.
• W35808879 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21289902" @default.
• W35808879 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W35808879 type Work @default.
• W35808879 sameAs 35808879 @default.
• W35808879 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W35808879 countsByYear W358088792014 @default.
• W35808879 countsByYear W358088792015 @default.
• W35808879 countsByYear W358088792017 @default.
• W35808879 countsByYear W358088792018 @default.
• W35808879 countsByYear W358088792019 @default.
• W35808879 countsByYear W358088792020 @default.
• W35808879 countsByYear W358088792022 @default.
• W35808879 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W35808879 hasAuthorship W35808879A5013905523 @default.
• W35808879 hasAuthorship W35808879A5017525008 @default.
• W35808879 hasAuthorship W35808879A5017973419 @default.
• W35808879 hasAuthorship W35808879A5038449198 @default.
• W35808879 hasAuthorship W35808879A5069181970 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C110354214 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C21333345 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C22467394 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W35808879 hasConcept C89702864 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C110354214 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C116834253 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C127413603 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C160735492 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C177264268 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C17744445 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C195094911 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C199360897 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C199539241 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C21333345 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C22467394 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C41008148 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C539667460 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C56739046 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C59822182 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C71924100 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C86803240 @default.
• W35808879 hasConceptScore W35808879C89702864 @default.
• W35808879 hasLocation W358088791 @default.
• W35808879 hasOpenAccess W35808879 @default.
• W35808879 hasPrimaryLocation W358088791 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W1814663813 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W1978486486 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W1997445449 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2031972477 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2101813937 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2110352206 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2138657325 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2324671501 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2418213408 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2788990445 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W279342659 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W28953298 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2897223326 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W2904445666 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W3113056030 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W3123961132 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W3158196360 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W3172164149 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W89681817 @default.
• W35808879 hasRelatedWork W1450697762 @default.
• W35808879 isParatext "false" @default.
• W35808879 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W35808879 magId "35808879" @default.
• W35808879 workType "article" @default.