FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W362776985> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W362776985 endingPage "221" @default.
• W362776985 startingPage "209" @default.
• W362776985 abstract "In this study, acceptance-rejection of a suggestion was investigated from the standpoint of social contact between a suggestee and a suggestor. In particular, credibility of the suggestor's ability in a certain field was built up through the process of experimental operations, and the author's attention was focused on the relationship between credibility and acceptance-rejection of a suggestion given by the suggestor.Hypothesis: Acceptance-rejection of a suggetion in a certain field depends upon the degree of credibility of the suggestor's ability in the field.Experimenter: Kouhei SuzukiSuggestor: A certain person named A.Subjects (suggestees): 387 lower secondary schoolchildren.Experimental instruments: Drawing papers, Drawing test papers, black and red pencils, a taperecorder and a stop-watch.Procedure: (1) (The process of creating credibility)At first subjects were told that a certain person named A had already performed the tasks of drawing. And it was instructed that the aim of each subject's engagement was to judge (evaluate) the ways taken in tasks by A in terms of relevancy. (Six papers were to be drawn and each of them had two possible ways of drawing, one of which was made more relevant than the other. Subjects were informed the ways chosen by A from the experimenter. After having judged six ways taken by A, each subject reported the degree of credibility of A's drawing ability by checking the questionnaire.(2) (Giving a suggestion)Then, each subject was confronted with the test task of drawing and was told that each one was to be examined his (her) own drawing ability and was encouraged to do his (her) best. The test task had five possible ways and any of them was allowed to be taken up by a subject. When subjects were going to begin their tasks, the suggestion from A which recommended one of those five ways was reported to subjects by the experimenter. And then, they started the test. Thus, acceptance-rejection of the suggestion occurred.Findings: The points of analyses in the process of creating credibility were these, “the four types of processes designed in the experiment and the degree of credibility”, “the degree of difference in the performance scores and the degree of credibility”, and “the degree of judgment and the degree of credibility”. Each of them showed that the latter depended upon the former.The analyses in the relation of credibility and acceptance-rejection, i.e., “the degree of credibility and the degree of acceptance” and “the degree of credibility and the strength of acceptance” showed that the higher the degree of credibility grew, the higher and the greater the degree and the strength of acceptance became." @default.
• W362776985 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W362776985 creator A5071483512 @default.
• W362776985 date "1960-01-01" @default.
• W362776985 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W362776985 title "AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ACCEPTANCE-REJECTION OF A SUGGESTION (1)" @default.
• W362776985 cites W1488275460 @default.
• W362776985 cites W1550382491 @default.
• W362776985 cites W1578958794 @default.
• W362776985 cites W1608197422 @default.
• W362776985 cites W1982805862 @default.
• W362776985 cites W1983191171 @default.
• W362776985 cites W1999466401 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2012088145 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2045009615 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2045888674 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2047524393 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2048574501 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2063099148 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2077817780 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2087124330 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2095450651 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2120061261 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2317230414 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2323859830 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2327726452 @default.
• W362776985 cites W2795756599 @default.
• W362776985 cites W3133354213 @default.
• W362776985 cites W52799713 @default.
• W362776985 doi "https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.31.209" @default.
• W362776985 hasPublicationYear "1960" @default.
• W362776985 type Work @default.
• W362776985 sameAs 362776985 @default.
• W362776985 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W362776985 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W362776985 hasAuthorship W362776985A5071483512 @default.
• W362776985 hasBestOaLocation W3627769851 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W362776985 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C111472728 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C111919701 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C138885662 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C151730666 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C15744967 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C161191863 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C202444582 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C2777267654 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C2777855551 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C2780224610 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C33923547 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C41008148 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C77805123 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C86803240 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C9652623 @default.
• W362776985 hasConceptScore W362776985C98045186 @default.
• W362776985 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W362776985 hasLocation W3627769851 @default.
• W362776985 hasOpenAccess W362776985 @default.
• W362776985 hasPrimaryLocation W3627769851 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W1967284665 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W1988185375 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W2033145121 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W2137628808 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W2146938970 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W2592818218 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W2809777561 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W362776985 hasRelatedWork W3194530526 @default.
• W362776985 hasVolume "31" @default.
• W362776985 isParatext "false" @default.
• W362776985 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W362776985 magId "362776985" @default.
• W362776985 workType "article" @default.