Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W373714847> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W373714847 endingPage "1497" @default.
- W373714847 startingPage "1453" @default.
- W373714847 abstract "Recently, the Iowa Supreme Court concluded that an employer who terminated an employee to allay the concerns of his jealous spouse did not unlawfully discriminate on the basis of sex. Though the Iowa decision addressed a claim filed under a state civil rights statute, it highlights an emerging question in broader sexdiscrimination jurisprudence—whether terminating an employee based on romantic jealousy constitutes unlawful sex discrimination. This Note argues that Title VII should be interpreted to prohibit some terminations based on romantic jealousy. Sex-discrimination claims based on romantic jealousy are properly classified as mixedmotive claims. Thus, the question courts must ask in analyzing romantic-jealousy claims is whether the jealousy that provoked a termination was motivated by gender. In some circumstances, it will be clear that gender motivated both romantic jealousy and any termination resulting therefrom. Courts should not rely on or extend precedents involving favoritism or romantic relationships to dismiss sex-discrimination claims arising due to romantic jealousy. The rationales justifying the dismissal of claims in the favoritism and romantic-relationship contexts are inapplicable to the romantic-jealousy context. Furthermore, to dismiss claims due to the existence of nonsexual, nonromantic personal relationships between employers and employees would drastically limit Title VII’s reach. To accurately Copyright © 2015 Kristy Dahl Rogers. † Duke University School of Law, J.D. expected 2015; Washington University in St. Louis, A.B. 2001. Many thanks to my advisor Professor Trina Jones for her invaluable guidance in selecting a law school and in writing this Note. Thanks also to Professor Katharine Bartlett for her insightful comments and to the staff members of the Duke Law Journal for their thoughtful engagement throughout the editing process. Most of all, I thank my family and friends for their unwavering support and my husband, Aaron Rogers, for his constant faith and enduring love. ROGERS IN PP (DO NOT DELETE) 3/24/2015 11:44 AM 1454 DUKE LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 64:1453 determine whether jealousy-based termination constitutes unlawful discrimination, courts must look behind the jealousy." @default.
- W373714847 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W373714847 creator A5032359562 @default.
- W373714847 date "2015-04-01" @default.
- W373714847 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W373714847 title "An Irresistible Attraction: Rethinking Romantic Jealousy as a Basis for Sex-Discrimination Claims" @default.
- W373714847 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W373714847 type Work @default.
- W373714847 sameAs 373714847 @default.
- W373714847 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W373714847 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W373714847 hasAuthorship W373714847A5032359562 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C2776033948 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C2777495918 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C518914266 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W373714847 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C11171543 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C15744967 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C17319257 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C17744445 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C199539241 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C2776033948 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C2777495918 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C2778272461 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C518914266 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C71043370 @default.
- W373714847 hasConceptScore W373714847C77805123 @default.
- W373714847 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W373714847 hasLocation W3737148471 @default.
- W373714847 hasOpenAccess W373714847 @default.
- W373714847 hasPrimaryLocation W3737148471 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W1584538140 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2231540159 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2252815909 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2254717607 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2256140411 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2488188877 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2493347381 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W255944225 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2779386179 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W2891478640 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W3121699978 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W3122727984 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W3123076674 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W3124036061 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W3182541836 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W320935834 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W42796482 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W77691599 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W3123515315 @default.
- W373714847 hasRelatedWork W3124087593 @default.
- W373714847 hasVolume "64" @default.
- W373714847 isParatext "false" @default.
- W373714847 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W373714847 magId "373714847" @default.
- W373714847 workType "article" @default.