FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W376390473> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W376390473 abstract "The aim of this thesis is to understand the reasons behind the decision of the United States to stand in opposition to the International Criminal Court. This policy seems to contradict the United States'leading role in international justice and commitment to universal human rights. The opposition to the ICC presents an apparent contradiction between principles and interests, and provokes the question of what role power, identity and principles play in the formation of national interest. The author reviews the concept of national interest in International Relations theory. It is found that only a constructivist identity approach takes account of both power and identity in the formation of national interest. The constructivist identity approach presents the concept of national interest as endogenous to social interaction and linked to identity. National interest is thus not seen as an objective analytical concept from which one can derive and explain rational behavior by rational actors, but as the very phenomenon that we are trying to understand. This theoretical framework is firmly located in an understanding tradition. In the search for an understanding of why the United States’ decision-makers considered opposition to the ICC to be in the national interest of the United States, role theory serves as a method. The empirical part of this thesis consists of analysis of speeches and statements, and of role conceptions found therein. The results of this approach show that the apparent contradiction between principles and interests does not exist. The reason why the behavior examined appears to be contradictory is that the spectator lets his or her own expectations of behavior appropriate for a certain belief or a certain role conception stand as a guide. The only way we can understand the reasons behind a given behavior is by looking at the actors’ view of the problem and what beliefs and role conceptions come into play for the actors when they face a foreign policy issue. The analysis makes it clear that the United States views its behavior as contradictory neither to its principles, nor to its perceived roles. Instead, it is the roles of the United States, the sources of which include both principles and capabilities, that are the reasons behind the policy." @default.
• W376390473 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W376390473 creator A5052587531 @default.
• W376390473 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W376390473 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W376390473 title "The United States and the International Criminal Court : An Identity Approach" @default.
• W376390473 cites W1551827418 @default.
• W376390473 cites W1985524123 @default.
• W376390473 cites W2147989791 @default.
• W376390473 cites W2321053870 @default.
• W376390473 cites W579641206 @default.
• W376390473 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W376390473 type Work @default.
• W376390473 sameAs 376390473 @default.
• W376390473 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W376390473 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W376390473 hasAuthorship W376390473A5052587531 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C2776728590 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C2778407155 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C2780668109 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C2780932887 @default.
• W376390473 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C111472728 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C118084267 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C138885662 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C144024400 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C162324750 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C17744445 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C190253527 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C199539241 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C2776728590 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C2778407155 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C2780668109 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C2780932887 @default.
• W376390473 hasConceptScore W376390473C94625758 @default.
• W376390473 hasLocation W3763904731 @default.
• W376390473 hasOpenAccess W376390473 @default.
• W376390473 hasPrimaryLocation W3763904731 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W1572278818 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W1703397780 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W1829127481 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W2146042707 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W2241651186 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W2350697594 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W2483191497 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W2501914173 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W269877690 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W289954159 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W2915077442 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W3021902756 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W3122624391 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W3122851501 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W3123260959 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W3124931616 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W3141446672 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W3208460385 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W72080121 @default.
• W376390473 hasRelatedWork W2153626691 @default.
• W376390473 isParatext "false" @default.
• W376390473 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W376390473 magId "376390473" @default.
• W376390473 workType "article" @default.